Quantum Time Machine Solves Grandfather Paradox - Polidicks

Found it!!! A video of the guy who wants to build the machine, he uses light to achieve the effect. :science: [url]http://www.keepbusy.net/play.php?id=first-real-time-machine[/url]

A new kind of time travel based on quantum teleportation gets around the paradoxes that have plagued other time machines' What? Is this like how Win7 is better than Vista? Because if so we've all been there with our time machines haven't we?

[QUOTE=bravehat;23704670]Found it!!! A video of the guy who wants to build the machine, he uses light to achieve the effect. :science: [url]http://www.keepbusy.net/play.php?id=first-real-time-machine[/url][/QUOTE] Oh, he just wants to build the machine? I was under the assumption that someone actually had a time machine. Or do you have some other way to reliably prove this article. :colbert:

It was on discovery, find it yourself. Besides you still ain't got yourself out of that hole you dug yourself. Find me reliable methods for gathering accurate and repeatable data other than the scientific method.

Find me a working time machine and I will.

Well that would work and it's in the process of being made, also everything travels through time thanks to time dilation. It's obvious now you've lost all possible arguments and have nothing on your side, counter productive pride man.

[QUOTE=bravehat;23706735]Well that would work and it's in the process of being made, also everything travels through time thanks to time dilation. It's obvious now you've lost all possible arguments and have nothing on your side, counter productive pride man.[/QUOTE] Declaring yourself the winner isn't how it works. Besides, it's obvious that you've lost.

[img]http://s5.directupload.net/images/100406/cjs9gf72.gif[/img] Suddenly, straw men everywhere...

You're just throwing that term around now, aren't you?

Nah not really, but you've made shitty hypothetical claims, and every time I've raised a point it's been totally missed. Actually not sure why anyone replied in the first place, just realised you used the "no true scotsman" argument.

Er, just to get a word in edgewise... Paramund, your statement that we need a time machine to prove all of this is bullshit relative to the rest of science. By such logic, you cannot believe in black holes, because we have never flown into one. Also, I'd also like those reliable methods for gathering accurate and repeatable data other than the scientific method.

so, i could kill my Grandfather? There's a lot of big words there for freshmen, could they have used Leymans english perhaps? Lemme get this straight, i pop back, shoot my dad (for no particular reason), pop back and i'll still exist? but in another timeline, not? if so: [URL="http://www.facepunch.com/#"] [/URL] [URL="http://youtube.com/watch?v=f6V0R2VFytE"][media]http://youtube.com/watch?v=f6V0R2VFytE[/media][/URL] although satirical, would summarise it to a degree?

[QUOTE=InvisibleTed;23714198] Also, I'd also like those reliable methods for gathering accurate and repeatable data other than the scientific method.[/QUOTE] I would also like to hear about this

[QUOTE=InvisibleTed;23714198]Er, just to get a word in edgewise... Paramund, your statement that we need a time machine to prove all of this is bullshit relative to the rest of science. By such logic, you cannot believe in black holes, because we have never flown into one.[/quote] That's a bad comparison. This is more like me disliking a claim that someone has discovered a way to build a spaceship that can safely fly through a black hole. It's a solution to a problem we don't have, and we don't even know if we'll actually have this problem because we don't know how time travel really works, or if it even works at all. [quote]Also, I'd also like those reliable methods for gathering accurate and repeatable data other than the scientific method.[/QUOTE] Good job reading, I never said they were reliable. In fact, I said the opposite.

If time is a relative (and perhaps a local) phenomena as evidence suggests so far, one can only disregard the possibility of time travel to the past. Observe the past? Perhaps. Physically interact with it? I strongly doubt it.

[QUOTE=Paramud;23722766]That's a bad comparison. This is more like me disliking a claim that someone has discovered a way to build a spaceship that can safely fly through a black hole. It's a solution to a problem we don't have, and we don't even know if we'll actually have this problem because we don't know how time travel really works, or if it even works at all. [/quote] I'll concede this point. [QUOTE=Paramud;23722766] Good job reading, I never said they were reliable. In fact, I said the opposite.[/QUOTE] Well my bad. Now where's the list?