Florida Court Rules Pasting Kids' Faces on Naked Adult Bodies is Not Child Porn

[Biotoxsin]

I wonder if someone with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (or a similar condition) could make it successfully in the porn industry with people like this around

[Scot]

I came here expecting naked adult bodies with children's faces. I was disappointed.

[Rofl my Waff]

The bottom line is people who are attracted to kids can't really control the fact they are attracted to kids. So if this dude has found a way to control his urges and not support the child porn industry then good for fucking him.

[TheTalon]

[QUOTE=Megafanx13;32568832]The court's right, it isn't child porn. It's pretty obscene, but certainly not illegal if done privately.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, It's weird and sickening in a way, but it's not child pornography in the slightest, so no harm done really. Distributing the photos would be a different story, however

[MountainWatcher]

Actually, I'm thinking doing this could be sexual harassment in the same way peeping is. Of course, by that logic, thinking of sexual acts should be sexual harassment, too.

[JohnnyMo]

Facepunch in a nutshell:

It's not hurting anyone... but it IS GROSS! THROW HIM IN JAIL FOR ETERNITY!

[carcarcargo]

[QUOTE=TheTalon;32575068]Yeah, It's weird and sickening in a way, but it's not child pornography in the slightest, so no harm done really. Distributing the photos would be a different story, however[/QUOTE]

You couldn't really get him on distributing it either to be honest, what he's doing isn't really hurting children. While I hate pedophilia with a passion, I'd rather they did this shit than actually used real children.

[Funcoot]

[QUOTE=Rofl my Waff;32574624]The bottom line is people who are attracted to kids can't really control the fact they are attracted to kids. So if this dude has found a way to control his urges and not support the child porn industry then good for fucking him.[/QUOTE]

Did not think of it this way.

[editline]1st October 2011[/editline]

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;32575235]Facepunch in a nutshell:

It's not hurting anyone... but it IS GROSS! THROW HIM IN JAIL FOR ETERNITY![/QUOTE]

A good deal of FP actually seems to think simulated child porn is okay if I recall from past news articles involving cartoons and stuff.

I think any depiction of a child in porn is disgusting, but my stances on whether simulated should be illegal or not is still undecided.

[Splarg]

[QUOTE=Funcoot;32575556]I think any depiction of a child in porn is disgusting, but my stances on whether simulated should be illegal or not is still undecided.[/QUOTE]

Telling someone that they can't draw or animate a certain thing in private is unconstitutional. Child porn is illegal because it involves actual little kids being taken advantage of.

[NicoleEmilid]

If you guys think it should be illegal, call your congressman. Stop complaining on facepunch.

[PGunnii]

so uh

that's cool i guess

i don't really wanna imagine it but ok

[editline]1st October 2011[/editline]

i mean wow holy shit like how do you fap to that

[ThisGuy0]

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;32575235]Facepunch in a nutshell:

It's not hurting anyone... but it IS GROSS! THROW HIM IN JAIL FOR ETERNITY![/QUOTE]

I'd say the proportion of FPers like that is still well below the proportion of people in general.

[Komppu]

I made some researches and all what i can say is that you can't find this kinda of pictures any attractive.

[B]NSFW[/B] Here is proof: [url]http://filesmelt.com/dl/So_Not_Sexy.png[/url] [B]NSFW[/B]

[Soviet Bread]

[QUOTE=Combine 177;32576406]I made some researches and all what i can say is that you can't find this kinda of pictures any attractive.

[B]NSFW[/B] Here is proof: [url]http://filesmelt.com/dl/So_Not_Sexy.png[/url] [B]NSFW[/B][/QUOTE]

I think he should stick to older women.

[Crimor]

[QUOTE=Bombardier.;32571193]Morally wrong? Yes, probably.
Legally wrong? No.[/QUOTE]

Don't bring morals into this, it's even more person based than opinions.

[[Seed Eater]]

This was not what I expected.

When I read the title I expected there was some weird cult or some shit that actually pasted children's faces onto peoples naked bodies, like, in real life, and then taking pictures or something.

[thisispain]

this is a victory, right? i'm not really sure.

[Yogurt]

I dislike how everyone hates pedophiles. I despise [b]child rapists[/b], but who the FUCK are you to hate someone because of something they CAN'T EVEN CONTROL?

Jesus Christ.

[Megafan]

[QUOTE=Yogurt;32583602]I dislike how everyone hates pedophiles. I despise [b]child rapists[/b], but who the FUCK are you to hate someone because of something they CAN'T EVEN CONTROL?

Jesus Christ.[/QUOTE]
Not too many people make the distinction between child molester and pedophile, and even some that do say "they're bound to molest kids anyway".

[Clementine]

[QUOTE=flyschy;32569322]Well here we go.

[url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15363608]Source.[/url][/QUOTE]

ban water if you drink too much you'll have to pee and if you drive then you might pee your pants and kill everyone

[Zezibesh]

[QUOTE=Megafanx13;32584706]Not too many people make the distinction between child molester and pedophile, and even some that do say "they're bound to molest kids anyway".[/QUOTE]

I like women so I am bound to molest them

[ironman17]

Sure, technically no child was harmed in the making of that crap stuff, but it's still some damn weird and sick debauchery.

[Mind Man]

This guy photoshops children's faces on porn and gets off scott free while that guy who sang an obscene song and then edited it to have children present (not to be a pedophile but to be funny) gets punished?

[znk666]

A baptist church?Why am i not surprised?

[CoolHandLuke]

[URL="http://rule34-images.paheal.net/_images/e32db81543991300aade69f0c2fabe43/33%20-%20Anne_Frank.jpg"]http://rule34-images.paheal.net/_images/e32db81543991300aade69f0c2fabe43/33%20-%20Anne_Frank.jpg[/URL]

So, this is LEGAL?

[video=youtube;P3ALwKeSEYs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3ALwKeSEYs[/video]

[Alex_DeLarge]

[QUOTE=Laserbeams;32569270]It doesn't hurt anyone so it's fine, you can't ban things because they're sick, that's not how it works.[/QUOTE]

Yeah but people should have the right to know that if he's taking pictures of their kids at the local little league game, this is the type of shit he does, hopefully a father with a pair of balls will stab him if he tries.

[June]

[QUOTE=SoaringScout;32574350]By that logic, freedom of speech should be illegal because people can say sexist and racist things which, to some people, can be considered despicable.[/QUOTE]

In Canada hate speech is illegal.

[Noobmaster]

It's not consider porn, only if kids are having sex in photos.

[Swilly]

[QUOTE=Mind Man;32588695]This guy photoshops children's faces on porn and gets off scott free while that guy who sang an obscene song and then edited it to have children present (not to be a pedophile but to be funny) gets punished?[/QUOTE]

Wasn't it the other way around, where he sang a nice song infront of the children and then edited to be obscene.