[disturbing] Brazilian "artist" makes his face a dog's - Polidicks

Get a source that is not a forum and maybe I will believe you

Don't worry guys. [quote]experts think it will not be permanent because the blood of humans and dogs are different and can not be put together so that over time the dog head that ignites it will rot.[/quote]

It's gonna stink of dog-meat after a while. And he's going to constantly have to smell it. What a douche, he was actually not a bad looking guy.

[QUOTE=cecilbdemodded;28476958]If he thinks that's being an artist then he's barking up the wrong tree.[/QUOTE] Please explain what "being an artist" is, since you obviously know what you're talking about and have spent years upon years studying the subject.

[QUOTE=Mac2468;28477089]Don't worry guys.[/QUOTE] Wait, what does the dog head ignite?

[QUOTE=Mac2468;28477089]Don't worry guys. [quote]ignites[/quote][/QUOTE] what

[QUOTE=ExplodingGuy;28477029]I'm sure that the last few photos are shopped, after all, his whole face would be swollen, and slightly orange-ish from the antiseptic. Either way, it's still sick that they beheaded a dog for this.[/QUOTE] Read the clarifying note on his site. It was a dog that was in a pound that was euthanized after not being adopted for a period of time. Still fucking weird though.

[QUOTE=ExplodingGuy;28477029]Either way, it's still sick that they beheaded a dog for this.[/QUOTE] It was already dead, euthanised by the authorities because they couldn't find an owner

[QUOTE=Sanius;28477108]Please explain what "being an artist" is, since you obviously know what you're talking about and have spent years upon years studying the subject.[/QUOTE] If he spliced on a boxer's face then posed for a photograph of him in the ring knocking out an opponent- that's art. It would be making a commentary on the animalistic side of man, fighting like dogs. Just splicing a mutt's face on your own is not art. He would have been better off having surgery that allows him to lick his own balls- at least it wouldn't be as pointless as what he's done.

[QUOTE=cecilbdemodded;28477173] Just splicing a mutt's face on your own is not art.[/QUOTE] Yes it is. There is no 50,000 page book that lists things that are not art. You are talking out of your ass, and you should be ashamed of yourself. "Art is subjective" does not mean "if I don't like it, it's not art."

I remeber this. Oh god.

The source is a forum. Okay.

Of course this isn't real, what the hell is wrong with you idiots

:fireman:

[QUOTE=Sanius;28477203]Yes it is. There is no 50,000 page book that lists things that are not art. You are talking out of your ass, and you should be ashamed of yourself. "Art is subjective" does not mean "if I don't like it, it's not art."[/QUOTE] It's NOT art, it's disgusting, art is something someone can enjoy, if I cant enjoy it then it's not art for me.

[QUOTE=Laserbeams;28477272]It's NOT art, it's disgusting, art is something someone can enjoy, if I cant enjoy it then it's not art for me.[/QUOTE] Good thing you don't determine what art is.

[QUOTE=cecilbdemodded;28477173]If he spliced on a boxer's face then posed for a photograph of him in the ring knocking out an opponent- that's art. It would be making a commentary on the animalistic side of man, fighting like dogs. Just splicing a mutt's face on your own is not art. He would have been better off having surgery that allows him to lick his own balls- at least it wouldn't be as pointless as what he's done.[/QUOTE] There's no definition of art. Art is art and that's that. It's purely subjective and any boundaries placed on it are simply the ones you're arbitrarily slapping on it. I go to art school :smug:

[QUOTE=Sanius;28477285]Good thing you don't determine what art is.[/QUOTE] I have my own definition of art that is right in my opinion, deal with it

[QUOTE=Laserbeams;28477272]It's NOT art, it's disgusting, art is something someone can enjoy, if I cant enjoy it then it's not art for me.[/QUOTE] Fruit is something someone can enjoy, if I don't enjoy apples they aren't fruit to me

Furry to the max. But why in my country? Why not America or some other country besides mine?

[QUOTE=Sanius;28477203]Yes it is. There is no 50,000 page book that lists things that are not art. You are talking out of your ass, and you should be ashamed of yourself. "Art is subjective" does not mean "if I don't like it, it's not art."[/QUOTE] "art is subjective" also means we can make our subjective judgement upon it it's as much our opinion of whether it is art, or in fact good, as the artist. "beauty is in the eye of the beholder"

I'm sure this is fake.

[QUOTE=Laserbeams;28477308]I have my own definition of art that is right in my opinion, deal with it[/QUOTE] Art is not subjective. If someone considers it art then it is art. Whether or not it has any artistic value [B]is[/B] subjective. At least get your terminology straight.

[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;28477339]"art is subjective" also means we can make our subjective judgement upon it it's as much our opinion of whether it is art, or in fact good, as the artist. "beauty is in the eye of the beholder"[/QUOTE] True, but art is subjective and therefore your opinion of it is only your opinion, and you should really acknowledge that before you start slapping your arbitrary boundaries on other peoples subjective feelings of art. Just saying.

[QUOTE=Zeke129;28477313]Fruit is something someone can enjoy, if I don't enjoy apples they aren't fruit to me[/QUOTE] No, a fruit is a structure of a plant that contains seeds, the definition of "fruit" isn't subjective, it's a scientific term. The word "art" is not like that, everybody has different tastes and likings, so everybody should have different definitions of it

[QUOTE=Laserbeams;28477389]No, a fruit is a structure of a plant that contains seeds, the definition of "fruit" isn't subjective, it's a scientific term. The word "art" is not like that, everybody has different tastes and likings, so everybody should have different definitions of it[/QUOTE] [url=http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=art]Art, n: the product(s) of human creativity.[/url]

Also, I cant believe we're arguing about art in a news thread about a guy that photoshopped a dog on his head

[QUOTE=Laserbeams;28477475]Also, I cant believe we're arguing about art in a news thread about a guy that photoshopped a dog on his head[/QUOTE] it's got the word artist in the title. We're not offtopic here.

[QUOTE=Protection;28477334]Furry to the max. But why in my country? Why not America or some other country besides mine?[/QUOTE] Because America is totally a country.

You guys do realise that it's just plastic bits modelled off the body of a dog?