• Liberals Organizing a Tea Party of Their Own
    312 replies, posted
[QUOTE=JDK721;23268692]source[/QUOTE] [url]http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2008/04/the-fed-regulat.html[/url]
[QUOTE=Chippay;23268697]it also creates food regulations i think we can all agree that food would be cheaper, and tastier without any government intervention about nonsense like 'health standards' too[/QUOTE] Multi-million dollar food companies are the worst my god
[QUOTE=JDK721;23268692]source[/QUOTE] You gonna keep crying source or actually come up with something to refute him?
[QUOTE=Wayword;23268690]Of all the things people want, housing is something everyone needs. Where they want it is the only variable.[/QUOTE] The problem is the government thinks everyone needs to own a house. Renting a house or an apartment is a perfectly reasonable alternative, but nobody in government wants to believe that.
[QUOTE=Chippay;23268697]it also creates food regulations i think we can all agree that food would be cheaper, and tastier without any government intervention about nonsense like 'health standards' too[/QUOTE] Regulation to a certain degree is good. [editline]10:54PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Wayword;23268690]Of all the things people want, housing is something everyone needs. Where they want it is the only variable.[/QUOTE] But economically it's impossible. Good luck living in your dream world where everyone has a house.
[QUOTE=PvtCupcakes;23268732]The problem is the government thinks everyone needs to own a house. Renting a house or an apartment is a perfectly reasonable alternative, but nobody in government wants to believe that.[/QUOTE] That's the point. People have been buying houses for years, adding taxes or regulations probably isn't going to change much, it's the idea of living large that sort of made people buy houses they couldn't afford. Combined with the fact that banks were willing to give loans to these idiots.
[QUOTE=zombiefreak;23268725][url]http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2008/04/the-fed-regulat.html[/url][/QUOTE] I'm still blaming it on the companies being idiots
[QUOTE=zombiefreak;23268738] But economically it's impossible. Good luck living in your dream world where everyone has a house.[/QUOTE] Apartments/condos are still housing.
[QUOTE=Wayword;23268750]That's the point. People have been buying houses for years, adding taxes or regulations probably isn't going to change much, it's the idea of living large that sort of made people buy houses they couldn't afford.[/QUOTE] No, it's houses in general. They can't afford a fucking house.
Like Bernie Madoff
[QUOTE=Wayword;23268755]Apartments/condos are still housing.[/QUOTE] Not everyone can live in a house.
[QUOTE=zombiefreak;23268761]No, it's houses in general. They can't afford a fucking house.[/QUOTE] That's what I just said.
[QUOTE=Habsburg;23268754]I'm still blaming it on the companies being idiots[/QUOTE] Everyone's at fault really. The government for allowing it to happen and companies for doing it.
[QUOTE=zombiefreak;23268766]Not everyone can live in a house.[/QUOTE] Yes. I know.
[QUOTE=Wayword;23268722]Not entirely true and you know that.[/QUOTE] explain
[QUOTE=dogmachines;23268773]Everyone's at fault really. The government for allowing it to happen and companies for doing it.[/QUOTE] sounds like deregulation is bad
[QUOTE=zombiefreak;23268653] Regulation caused the housing market to burst. [/QUOTE] addendum: black is white and up is down. The market didn't burst after one of the most intense periods of market de-regulation in american history. Everything is just an illusion here at club silencio
[QUOTE=zombiefreak;23268766]Not everyone can live in a house.[/QUOTE] That's why he said Apartments and Condos are still places for people to live in...
[QUOTE=JDK721;23268787]explain[/QUOTE] Radical Islam is naturally oppressive.
[QUOTE=JDK721;23268787]explain[/QUOTE] For one, the hijackers were Muslim. So it's not like Islam had NOTHING to do with it. You can go on further to say they were extremists, but the argument starts there.
[QUOTE=zombiefreak;23268804]Radical Islam is naturally oppressive.[/QUOTE] so can radical knitting
[QUOTE=Habsburg;23268814]so can radical knitting[/QUOTE] radical dudes too [IMG]http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i268/nickrave/02.jpg[/IMG] he is a killing machine
[QUOTE=Wayword;23268806]For one, the hijackers were Muslim. So it's not like Islam had NOTHING to do with it. You can go on further to say they were extremists, but the argument starts there.[/QUOTE] nope it was entirely a political move
[QUOTE=Habsburg;23268842]nope it was entirely a political move[/QUOTE] However, all the people that followed are recruited under the guise that they are doing their religion a good deed. So even if the conflict is political in nature, the religion aspect isn't irrelevant.
The government is a failure... Have fun with corporate America 2012!
[QUOTE=Wayword;23268855]However, all the people that followed are recruited under the guise that they are doing their religion a good deed. So even if the conflict is political in nature, the religion aspect isn't irrelevant.[/QUOTE] so religion is just a political tool
[QUOTE=Habsburg;23268796]sounds like deregulation is bad[/QUOTE] Regulation can be good or bad. It can limit the companies too much, or give them too much freedom. In the case of the stock market crash, there wasn't enough. The response of buying out the companies that were failing was perhaps too much regulation, and only resulted in a short term fix that led to massive debt without entirely fixing the problem.
[QUOTE=Wayword;23268855]However, all the people that followed are recruited under the guise that they are doing their religion a good deed. So even if the conflict is political in nature, the religion aspect isn't irrelevant.[/QUOTE] however the religion itself doesn't endorse it, nor is terrorism in any way a mainstream part of Islam. Blaming terrorism on Islam is stupid because it's a lot more complicated than that.
[QUOTE=Sigma-Lambda;23268878]however the religion itself doesn't endorse it, nor is terrorism in any way a mainstream part of Islam. Blaming terrorism on Islam is stupid because it's a lot more complicated than that.[/QUOTE] I'm not blaming anything on Islam, but the religion aspect isn't entirely irrelevant. That's my point. [editline]02:05AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Habsburg;23268875]so religion is just a political tool[/QUOTE] Sometimes.
[QUOTE=Habsburg;23268842]nope it was entirely a political move[/QUOTE] A group of radical Muslims attacks the USA and Islam is not at all a part of it? Hard to believe.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.