• Google to block Flash on Chrome, only 10 websites exempt
    41 replies, posted
[QUOTE=FreakySoup;50346928]rip in peace [url=http://brendanfraser.com/]Brendan Fraser's website[/url][/QUOTE] "High-bandwidth or Low-Bandwidth" Now that's not a menu I've seen for a long time.
[QUOTE=Gmod4ever;50342173]Are there any decent tools comparable to Adobe Flash for creating tools and games in HTML5? Because that's the only reason why I still use Flash - Adobe has some pretty damn convenient tools for it. If similar tools exist for HTML5, then I'm all for jumping ship.[/QUOTE] You could just use Unity.
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;50342311]Zombocom better be on that fucking list.[/QUOTE] [url]https://html5zombo.com/[/url]
[QUOTE=Demache;50346840]Its had a HTML5 player component for years now (albeit buggy), I don't know why they haven't been developing it to make it the primary one and stable.[/QUOTE] I tried to use it in firefox with flash intentionally disabled and it claims I need flash when the HTML5 option is on.
[QUOTE=simkas;50347126]You could just use Unity.[/QUOTE] Unity seems like a pretty heavy package for just making simple 2D Flash games. Well, "Flash" games. :v:
I just use this to disable flash [url]https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/flashcontrol/mfidmkgnfgnkihnjeklbekckimkipmoe[/url]
[QUOTE=Gmod4ever;50347994]Unity seems like a pretty heavy package for just making simple 2D Flash games. Well, "Flash" games. :v:[/QUOTE] Unity is pretty light weight and worth learning if you have any future interest in game developlment, you can use as much or as little of its features as you want. Beauty of component systems.
Newgrounds is going to be a trainwreck.
I understand wanting to phase out flash but is it really necessary to block websites entirely ? I still visit old flash based websites for shits and giggles pretty frequently, like the legendary [url=http://z0r.de/]z0r.de[/url].
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;50349296]I understand wanting to phase out flash but is it really necessary to block websites entirely ? I still visit old flash based websites for shits and giggles pretty frequently, like the legendary [URL="http://z0r.de/"]z0r.de[/URL].[/QUOTE] [quote]Where the Flash Player is the only option for viewing content on a site, users will need to actively switch it on for individual sites.[/quote] Firefox has done this [I]without[/I] a whitelist for ages. Any time a site wants to run flash it replaces where it would be with something like this and you can choose to enable it for the session or permanently per site. It also adds an icon next to the address bar in case the flash element isn't visible. No doubt Google will find some way to make it horribly un-user friendly however. [t]http://helifreak.duckdns.org/image/20160519073357424.png[/t] Text says "enable adobe flash."
[QUOTE=helifreak;50349376]Firefox has done this [I]without[/I] a whitelist for ages. Any time a site wants to run flash it replaces where it would be with something like this and you can choose to enable it for the session or permanently per site. It also adds an icon next to the address bar in case the flash element isn't visible. No doubt Google will find some way to make it horribly un-user friendly however. [t]http://52.62.164.10/image/20160519073357424.png[/t] Text says "enable adobe flash."[/QUOTE] Google will have you go into the Chrome flags to enable that option but hide it without giving some command line argument. :v:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.