Paris ban on Muslim street prayers comes into effect - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Ganerumo;32327605]Getting back to the whole racial oppression bullshit, no, the law isn't here to oppress a "race"[/QUOTE] Oh thanks for that insight Mr. "We are the Majority they don't have rights"

[QUOTE=Ganerumo;32327605]then it just turned into a shitstorm for 15 pages of you not reading the thread and bragging about non-existent issues.[/QUOTE] The annoying Liberals tend to enjoy finding problems where none exist and focusing on petty shit instead of real issues.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32327679]The annoying Liberals tend to enjoy finding problems where none exist and focusing on petty shit instead of real issues.[/QUOTE] Real issues, like getting that AI to rule the world up and running

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32327679]The annoying Liberals tend to enjoy finding problems where none exist and focusing on petty shit instead of real issues.[/QUOTE] yeah just remember the motto of democracy: [QUOTE=Ganerumo;32326947]Sucks to be them, a minority can't force a majority to change, that's democracy.[/quote] Thats why black people still have separate schools and jews are still kept in concentration camps. Fuck the minorities.

[QUOTE=Lankist;32327724]yeah just remember the motto of democracy: "Sucks to be them, a minority can't force a majority to change, that's democracy." Thats why black people still have separate schools and jews are still kept in concentration camps. Fuck the minorities.[/QUOTE] I support a single party state full of pragmatic political realists.

I'm honestly surprised at how many people agree with this. The argument for the Muslims' own safety is a shit one, because if they are praying in the street, they obviously care more about remaining loyal to their religion than the risks involved. The government shouldn't get to say what's for their own good - that's not for the government to decide. The government should be concerned with regulating things like the economy and healthcare and job security. The freedom to publicly practice one's religion should be totally out of the government's jurisdiction. Impinging on people's freedoms is the first step to fascism. This ban is a giant step in the wrong direction.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32327756]I support a single party state full of pragmatic political realists.[/QUOTE] So when us minorities outnumber you white folks, (technically we already do) you just gonna take it in the ass whatever we say?

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32327756]I support a single party state full of pragmatic political realists.[/QUOTE] also known as, "I support a single party state full of people who agree with me" or "fascism" oh wait you're sobototnik you don't matter

[QUOTE=Lazor;32327806]also known as, "I support a single party state full of people who agree with me" or "fascism" oh wait you're sobototnik you don't matter[/QUOTE] technically it's totalitarianism. Fascism comes later when they start murdering dissenters.

[QUOTE=Lankist;32327816]technically it's totalitarianism. Fascism comes later when they start murdering dissenters.[/QUOTE] And also state control of private companies, but without any of the good of legitimate social services.

[QUOTE=Megafanx13;32327838]And also state control of private companies, but without any of the good of legitimate social services.[/QUOTE] No, the state would own everything in the nation and distribute out free healthcare and other social benefits for example. Plus the bourgeois who disagree would be dealt harshly for impeding human progress. [QUOTE=Lankist;32327788]So when us minorities outnumber you white folks, (technically we already do) you just gonna take it in the ass whatever we say?[/QUOTE] The state would do what is considered the most sensible course of action. If people protest the use of Animal testing simply use them for the tests.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32327884]No, the state would own everything in the nation and distribute out free healthcare and other social benefits for example. Plus the bourgeois who disagree would be dealt harshly for impeding human progress.[/QUOTE] And if they fail at that job, fuck it, who wants to appeal the government anyway?

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32327884]No, the state would own everything in the nation and distribute out free healthcare and other social benefits for example.[/QUOTE] No it wouldn't, it would hoard everything for itself since there's no oversight and no way to keep them accountable.

[QUOTE=Zeke129;32327913]No it wouldn't, it would hoard everything for itself since there's no oversight and no way to keep them accountable.[/QUOTE] Then explain the high standard of living in the USSR during the 60s, 70s and 80s.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32327958]Then explain the high standard of living in the USSR during the 60s, 70s and 80s.[/QUOTE] you mean the fact that they didn't know how to farm or the fact that there were frequent riots over scraps of bread or the fact that they collapsed due to the fact that they were all starving?

This thread is fast as hell. I support the idea of the bill, nobody should be allowed to hold up traffic like that. I don't care if you're a Muslim or a Christian or agnostic, just get out of the road. Granting them permission to do so is granting specific extra rights based on their religion.

[QUOTE=Lankist;32327976]you mean the fact that they didn't know how to farm or the fact that there were frequent riots over scraps of bread or the fact that they collapsed due to the fact that they were all starving?[/QUOTE] No don't you see For a short period of time they had a higher life expectancy than the United States That makes it all better

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32327884]No, the state would own everything in the nation and distribute out free healthcare and other social benefits for example. Plus the bourgeois who disagree would be dealt harshly for impeding human progress.[/QUOTE] You gotta try pretty hard to convince a Socialist that state services would be a bad idea, but even I wouldn't say things "everything in the nation should belong to the government" or "the bourgeois should die for standing in our way".

[QUOTE=Megafanx13;32328025]You gotta try pretty hard to convince a Socialist that state services would be a bad idea, but even I wouldn't say things "everything in the nation should belong to the government" or "the bourgeois should die for standing in our way".[/QUOTE] The bourgeois do nothing but stunt human development by throwing up multiple obstacles in the way.

[QUOTE=Zeke129;32328012]No don't you see For a short period of time they had a higher life expectancy than the United States That makes it all better[/QUOTE] yeah there was like a year when people weren't emaciated shit was sooo good [editline]16th September 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Sobotnik;32328115]The bourgeois do nothing but stunt human development by throwing up multiple obstacles in the way.[/QUOTE] yeah pesky obstacles like rights

[QUOTE=Lankist;32328185]yeah there was like a year when people weren't emaciated shit was sooo good [editline]16th September 2011[/editline] yeah pesky obstacles like rights[/QUOTE] Well universal suffrage is a pretty useless right. All that happens is people vote in politicians based on popularity rather than skill. Eventually 2 major parties form and get caught up in partisan shit whilst politicians either bend over backwards or take it up the arse in a struggle for power instead of actually fixing problems. If you have a single party state, there is no more struggle for power since it is already at the top. The only way to become more powerful is to improve the nation. Making it more productive is one way and caring for the people within the borders of a nation will turn them into happy productive persons.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32328251]Well universal suffrage is a pretty useless right.[/QUOTE] "Universal Suffrage is a pretty useless right" -Sobotnik, a racist.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32327958]Then explain the high standard of living in the USSR during the 60s, 70s and 80s.[/QUOTE] [img]http://explodingdog.com/drawing/huh.gif[/img] seriously wat

[QUOTE=Lankist;32328286]"Universal Suffrage is a pretty useless right" -Sobotnik, a racist.[/QUOTE] So what made you come to the conclusion I am racist?

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32328309]So what made you come to the conclusion I am racist?[/QUOTE] "Universal Suffrage is a useless right" ^ That part Or you don't know what Universal Suffrage is. Either you're racist or you're stupid, take your pick.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32328309]So what made you come to the conclusion I am racist?[/QUOTE]Because he's been banned countless times for racism and trolling. He's trying to draw attention away from that. Look at his ban history.

[QUOTE=Ganerumo;32327605]If you can't understand that, there is no hope for you.[/QUOTE] yeah so even though the specific people behind the legislation say it's because they are muslim we are the ones that don't understand and it's actually because it's not safe, like burqa's. D- for effort

[QUOTE=faze;32328325]Because he's been banned countless times for racism and trolling. He's trying to draw attention away from that. Look at his ban history.[/QUOTE] yeah i disparage my own people all the goddamn time man

[QUOTE=Lankist;32328317]"Universal Suffrage is a useless right" ^ That part Or you don't know what Universal Suffrage is. Either you're racist or you're stupid, take your pick.[/QUOTE] That is not racist. Racism would be denying certain races to vote. Quite simply nobody would be able to vote. [QUOTE=faze;32328325]Because he's been banned countless times for racism and trolling. He's trying to draw attention away from that. Look at his ban history.[/QUOTE] You appear to have been banned a greater number of times.

[QUOTE=Lankist;32328349]yeah i disparage my own people all the goddamn time man[/QUOTE]Your own people being....?