U.S. Army Posts Job Listing For "93E Internment/Resettlement Specailist". - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Lankist;16586012]So you're just going to stick around and post empty useless bullshit like that with no relevance to the subject [editline]04:36PM[/editline] Because OP is a 13 year old.[/QUOTE] Okay. So if you're right and OP is a 13 year old, post something from another source, as it's common knowledge.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16586012]So you're just going to stick around and post empty useless bullshit like that with no relevance to the subject [editline]04:36PM[/editline] Because OP is a 13 year old. There are some people who think reptilians rule the Earth so does that mean because they disagree with physics, gravity is not common knowledge?[/QUOTE] So what, you are going to continue to attack my position, comparing me to some wackos to undermine my credibility despite ignoring all my sources, news articles, links, manuals, records that this predates what ever recent event they are tieing it to, despite me forfeiting to you already because I do not want to abandon my thread so you can continue with a irrelevance argument and politicize the thread that was meant to debunk the Article before some idiot comes and post it believing this is true the way the WND is spinning it as "OBAMA'S RESETTLEMENT CAMPS!"? Well you be my guest to do so, but I've folded, so leave me out of the argument because I don't feel like dealing with this bullshit.

Broseph, you realize Lankist is a troll, right? You already lost by replying to him in the first place.

[QUOTE=DeadMollusk;16586262]Broseph, you realize Lankist is a troll, right? You already lost by replying to him in the first place.[/QUOTE] No.

[QUOTE=Cloak Raider;16586033]Okay. So if you're right and OP is a 13 year old, post something from another source, as it's common knowledge.[/QUOTE] National Guard Mobilization Act, putting National Guard active troops under the command of Army officials rather than Guard officials. Montgomery Amendment, detailing that a National Guard official or a member of a local government cannot withhold the deployment of local Guardsmen under penalty of federal reprimand. The precedent this further solidified was that once made active, Guardsmen answered only to active military officials rather than their National Guard counterparts. John Warner Defense Authorization Act, in which, during a time of emergency, Guardsmen can be removed from the command of local government and placed under the command of federal government. All of these can be found on Wikipedia. The reason the National Guard is treated in this way is because it acts as LOCAL military, each state having its own branch of National Guard. The Federal Government ensures that once they call upon a Guard regiment for federal service they are no longer considered an active participant in that LOCAL organization. This is to prevent conflict of interest within the military. The National Guard cannot deploy as "The National Guard" because there are 50 National Guards in the goddamn country. A Guardsman from Arkansas would not be getting the same orders from a Guardsman in Virginia. It would be a clusterfuck. [editline]04:55PM[/editline] A clusterfuck with high powered assault weaponry The Guard is designed to act as emergency defense and support for local state governments in addition to its duties as a reserve service. If they were not transfered to a different command once they were deployed, they would all be slaughtered as they spent days trying to figure out who has been ordered to do what by whom.

No seriously can a mod either lock this or delete every single goddamn reply because I don't like reading through three pages of [b]FLAME WAR[/b] just to gauge others' opinions.

You would realize this if you had the capability to educate yourselves like functioning human beings.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16586310]National Guard Mobilization Act, putting National Guard active troops under the command of Army officials rather than Guard officials. Montgomery Amendment, detailing that a National Guard official or a member of a local government cannot withhold the deployment of local Guardsmen under penalty of federal reprimand. The precedent this further solidified was that once made active, Guardsmen answered only to active military officials rather than their National Guard counterparts. John Warner Defense Authorization Act, in which, during a time of emergency, Guardsmen can be removed from the command of local government and placed under the command of federal government. All of these can be found on Wikipedia. The reason the National Guard is treated in this way is because it acts as LOCAL military, each state having its own branch of National Guard. The Federal Government ensures that once they call upon a Guard regiment for federal service they are no longer considered an active participant in that LOCAL organization. This is to prevent conflict of interest within the military. The National Guard cannot deploy as "The National Guard" because there are 50 National Guards in the goddamn country. A Guardsman from Arkansas would not be getting the same orders from a Guardsman in Virginia. It would be a clusterfuck. [editline]04:55PM[/editline] A clusterfuck with high powered assault weaponry[/QUOTE] Or. [quote=Wikipedia]However unlike the United States Army and other armed forces, the National Guard (under state status) cannot leave American soil[/quote] That would have been good enough. So, National Guard are essentially state militia until their authority is overridden by Federal authority.

[QUOTE=TwinkieHouse;16586381]No seriously can a mod either lock this or delete every single goddamn reply because I don't like reading through three pages of [b]FLAME WAR[/b] just to gauge others' opinions.[/QUOTE] Mods lock this thread because I don't like reading it. Leave.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16586388]You would realize this if you had the capability to educate yourselves like functioning human beings.[/QUOTE] So, to sum up three pages of worthless argument, you could have ended it by posting one line from Wikipedia, instead of regarding yourself as an expert.

[QUOTE=Cloak Raider;16586391]Or. That would have been good enough. So, National Guard are essentially state militia until their authority is overridden by Federal authority.[/QUOTE] I prefer to reference legitimate legislation rather than a wikipedia excerpt. It acts exclusively as an on-soil organization, assisting mostly in natural disaster support like Katrina. Shit, their motto now is "citizen soldier." When you're deployed to another country in a time of war, you are considered a part of our foreign fighting force. The Guard itself, as an organization, does not have the authority to leave the country in any way, shape or form. They also do not have the authority to enforce law or really do ANYTHING until a state of national emergency is declared. They are the first and last line of defense, as they say it, and defense is the key word. It's a dual purpose, defense and reserve. [editline]05:02PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Cloak Raider;16586412]So, to sum up three pages of worthless argument, you could have ended it by posting one line from Wikipedia, instead of regarding yourself as an expert.[/QUOTE] I'm a fucking lawyer, I'm not going to quote wikipedia. I'm going to reference legitimate regulations, acts and legislation that are within the public realm that I am legally permitted to discuss. Wikipedia is just a biased repackaging of information, nobody with any sort of understanding of what they're talking about is going to quote wiki-fucking-pedia on legal affairs when they could just as easily find the actual, raw information.

Lankist, the debate is over, no-one gives a shit anymore Stop it, stop the argument, all it's doing is just filling up the thread with shit.

[QUOTE=Broseph_;16586469]Lankist, the debate is over, no-one gives a shit anymore because this has degraded into nothing more then a match of yelling I'M RIGHT YOU'RE WRONG.[/QUOTE] No it hasn't, or are you not reading his posts?

[QUOTE=Broseph_;16586469]Lankist, the debate is over, no-one gives a shit anymore Stop it, stop the argument, all it's doing is just filling up the thread with shit.[/QUOTE] No. You can leave if you don't like it. You two wanted legit legal references, I gave them to you.

[QUOTE=Broseph_;16586469]Lankist, the debate is over, no-one gives a shit anymore Stop it, stop the argument, all it's doing is just filling up the thread with shit.[/QUOTE] This x10

[QUOTE=Lankist;16586460]I prefer to reference legitimate legislation rather than a wikipedia excerpt. It acts exclusively as an on-soil organization, assisting mostly in natural disaster support like Katrina. Shit, their motto now is "citizen soldier." When you're deployed to another country in a time of war, you are considered a part of our foreign fighting force. The Guard itself, as an organization, does not have the authority to leave the country in any way, shape or form. They also do not have the authority to enforce law or really do ANYTHING until a state of national emergency is declared. They are the first and last line of defense, as they say it, and defense is the key word. It's a dual purpose, defense and reserve. [editline]05:02PM[/editline] I'm a fucking lawyer, I'm not going to quote wikipedia. I'm going to reference legitimate regulations, acts and legislation that are within the public realm that I am legally permitted to discuss.[/QUOTE] This is also the internet, not a court room. And you're not going to reference legitimate regulations, acts and legislation that are within the public realm, what you're going to do is spend three pages of a thread saying essentially that they are wrong, and then when the thread is dying, post these regulations. Why you didn't just say/quote these regulations first blows my mind.

[QUOTE=Cloak Raider;16586548]This is also the internet, not a court room. And you're not going to reference legitimate regulations, acts and legislation that are within the public realm, what you're going to do is spend three pages of a thread saying essentially that they are wrong, and then when the thread is dying, post these regulations.[/QUOTE] You said you wanted me to prove this is common knowledge and that I know what I'm talking about in terms of our own government regulations in regards to military and militia. I have done exactly as you asked me to. If all that's left for you to do is complain about the fucking thread you can leave. [editline]05:08PM[/editline] I will be reveling in victory in the meantime.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16586506]No. You can leave if you don't like it. You two wanted legit legal references, I gave them to you.[/QUOTE] Legit Legal References? Where The fuck are they, you basically went "I happen to be a expert on this and because of my expertness you are wrong", you provided no sources, links, news articles, photos, records, all of which I did. Also, STOP THE DEBATE, WHY MUST YOU CONTINUE WITH THE DEBATE, IT IS DOING NO GOOD WHAT SO FUCKING EVER. I tried to stop this debate on page one, yet you have managed to drag this on 2 pages despite me trying to stop it since you are just the equivalent of spamming this to hell and back.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16586310][b]National Guard Mobilization Act[/b], putting National Guard active troops under the command of Army officials rather than Guard officials. [b]Montgomery Amendment[/b], detailing that a National Guard official or a member of a local government cannot withhold the deployment of local Guardsmen under penalty of federal reprimand. The precedent this further solidified was that once made active, Guardsmen answered only to active military officials rather than their National Guard counterparts. [b]John Warner Defense Authorization Act[/b], in which, during a time of emergency, Guardsmen can be removed from the command of local government and placed under the command of federal government. All of these can be found on Wikipedia. The reason the National Guard is treated in this way is because it acts as LOCAL military, each state having its own branch of National Guard. The Federal Government ensures that once they call upon a Guard regiment for federal service they are no longer considered an active participant in that LOCAL organization. This is to prevent conflict of interest within the military. The National Guard cannot deploy as "The National Guard" because there are 50 National Guards in the goddamn country. A Guardsman from Arkansas would not be getting the same orders from a Guardsman in Virginia. It would be a clusterfuck. [editline]04:55PM[/editline] A clusterfuck with high powered assault weaponry The Guard is designed to act as emergency defense and support for local state governments in addition to its duties as a reserve service. If they were not transfered to a different command once they were deployed, they would all be slaughtered as they spent days trying to figure out who has been ordered to do what by whom.[/QUOTE] Those references. [editline]05:11PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Broseph_;16586623]Also, STOP THE DEBATE, WHY MUST YOU CONTINUE WITH THE DEBATE, IT IS DOING NO GOOD WHAT SO FUCKING EVER.[/QUOTE] your defeat it tastes like a rare-done steak its bloody and delicious with a hint of metal deposits that only solidify my superiority as a prime example of intellectualism.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16586595] will be reveling in victory in the meantime.[/QUOTE] Then stop debating then asshole.

[QUOTE=Broseph_;16586623]I tried to stop this debate on page one,[/QUOTE] And you failed miserably because you continue to contribute to it.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16586595]You said you wanted me to prove this is common knowledge and that I know what I'm talking about in terms of our own government regulations in regards to military and militia. I have done exactly as you asked me to. If all that's left for you to do is complain about the fucking thread you can leave. [editline]05:08PM[/editline] I will be reveling in victory in the meantime.[/QUOTE] Shit you beat me. You did what- wait no I'll let you say it for me. [quote=Lankist]I have done exactly as you asked me to[/quote] Note how in my accusations after my first post are passive in nature, that I never explicitly say that you are wrong, but that I haven't got a reason to believe you are right. You gave me proof, that is what I wanted. Revel in your victory against a person who stopped arguing a page ago.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16586647]our defeat it tastes like a rare-done steak its bloody and delicious with a hint of metal deposits that only solidify my superiority as a prime example of intellectualism.[/QUOTE] Oh now you're just being stuck up cunt.

[QUOTE=TwinkieHouse;16586381]No seriously can a mod either lock this or delete every single goddamn reply because I don't like reading through three pages of [b]FLAME WAR[/b] just to gauge others' opinions.[/QUOTE] It isn't a matter of opinion. Everything Lankist has said thus far is factual. Everything opposed to what he has said so far isn't.

[QUOTE=Broseph_;16586679]Then stop debating then asshole.[/QUOTE] Reveling requires celebration as the tears of the high and mighty rain down from above. I am reveling in your defeat in the only way possible. If you would like to refute me now you can go ahead. Make more [highlight][b]BIG RED HIGHLIGHTED POSTS[/b][/highlight] if it helps. [editline]05:14PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Cloak Raider;16586695] Revel in your victory against a person who stopped arguing a page ago.[/QUOTE] I will, thank you.

[QUOTE=Xenocidebot;16586702]It isn't a matter of opinion. Everything Lankist has said thus far is factual. Everything opposed to what he has said so far isn't.[/QUOTE] When I said "opinions" I meant what other people thought about the news article (by the way, WorldNetDaily is a conservative news site anyway, which I'm sure was mentioned previously). You know, the article that was in the long forgotten first post? Seriously, stop flinging shit at each other and call it a day.

This thread played out like a really bad piece of theatre. and yet, a really weird sense of catharsis.

[QUOTE=TwinkieHouse;16586750]When I said "opinions" I meant what other people thought about the news article (by the way, WorldNetDaily is a conservative news site anyway, which I'm sure was mentioned previously). You know, the article that was in the long forgotten first post? Seriously, stop flinging shit at each other and call it a day.[/QUOTE] You're only encouraging shit flinging, you realize that? What you're doing is like going into a gorilla cage and screaming at the gorilla to be calm. [editline]05:16PM[/editline] that gorilla is gon fuck your shit UP

-snip- Fuck this

Except how the National Guard is legally forbidden from operating overseas. [editline]05:19PM[/editline] I thought you were done with debating. [editline]05:21PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Broseph_;16586803]So what if the Guard is placed under federal authority, that doesn't change their status as the National Guard, just their command, just as the Marines Operate as the Marines even when they are sometimes under the command of the the Army or vice visa, also you stated there's 50 guards, despite there actually being 54 guards, 3 Territorial, one for Washington D.C., shows how fucking smart you are.[/QUOTE] No snip backs.