U.S. Army Posts Job Listing For "93E Internment/Resettlement Specailist". - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Lankist;16586813]Except how the National Guard is legally forbidden from operating overseas. [editline]05:19PM[/editline] I thought you were done with debating.[/QUOTE] You wont' stop being a cunt covered in shit rolling around in this thread for the hell of it. Also, there is nothing keeping them from being deployed in a "Congress sanctioned" war, which the war in Iraq and Afghanistan are legally. [editline]04:27PM[/editline] Here's the fucking shit in writing. [url]http://usmilitary.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=usmilitary&cdn=careers&tm=10&f=00&su=p284.9.336.ip_p554.12.336.ip_&tt=2&bt=0&bts=0&zu=http%3A//www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/12301.html[/url] Now will you just fuck off already so this thread can ridicule the WND article?

[QUOTE=TwinkieHouse;16586750]When I said "opinions" I meant what other people thought about the news article[/QUOTE] No, you didn't, because that hasn't been the primary topic of this thread for pages. Stop trying to get stifle this and be silent yourself.

Being deployed as Army or Airforce combatants, not National Guard representatives. It's in the Guard's goddamn founding documentation that they can never under any circumstances leave the country as an organization or command structure. Also rolling shit cunt that is a new one.

This thread is going in a circle again. This has been said before.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16586968]Being deployed as Army or Airforce combatants, not National Guard representatives. It's in the Guard's goddamn founding documentation that they can never under any circumstances leave the country as an organization or command structure. Also rolling shit cunt that is a new one.[/QUOTE] There is just no fucking winning with you, then again, you're a lawyer, and you're job is to rape the defense's/prosecution's position to the point of forcing them to surrender or shut the fuck up and sitting the fuck down in order to make them lose the case, and I can say, you are doing a damn good job of it.

[QUOTE=Broseph_;16587066]There is just no fucking winning with you, then again, you're a lawyer, and you're job is to rape the defense's/prosecution's position to the point of forcing them to surrender or shut the fuck up and sitting the fuck down in order to make them lose the case, and I can say, you are doing a damn good job of it.[/QUOTE] You know more about this subject than I do as a result of your profession, thus your profession is dishonorable and evil.

[QUOTE=Broseph_;16587066]There is just no fucking winning with you, then again, you're a lawyer, and you're job is to rape the defense's/prosecution's position to the point of forcing them to surrender or shut the fuck up and sitting the fuck down in order to make them lose the case, and I can say, you are doing a damn good job of it.[/QUOTE] Uhh, no, my job is to tell people who are very very very wrong that they are very very very wrong and in the vain hope that they aren't the intellectual equivalent of an infant try to explain to them why they are wrong. Unfortunately it seems that you are incapable of listening to a rational display of fact-based explanation as to how a certain branch of government operates and why, instead opting to call me a rolling cunt shitter. [editline]05:38PM[/editline] [QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;16587129]You know more about this subject than I do as a result of your profession, thus your profession is dishonorable and evil.[/QUOTE] Hey guys I have specialized education in this field of study. WHATEVER FAG YOU FUCKIN KNOW IT ALL WHY DONT YOU GO ROLL YOUR CUNT IN SHIT IM SUCH A MISOGYNIST FUCK

[QUOTE=Lankist;16587130]Uhh, no, my job is to tell people who are very very very wrong that they are very very very wrong and in the vain hope that they aren't the intellectual equivalent of an infant try to explain to them why they are wrong. Unfortunately it seems that you are incapable of listening to a rational display of fact-based explanation as to how a certain branch of government operates and why, instead opting to call me a rolling cunt shitter.[/QUOTE] Way to take things out of context, I only said that because of your posts "celebrating victory" when I've tried 3 times to get you to drop the argument, and stop posting so you can make the point, I've Listened, but I don't see how transferring from a State/Territorial/District's Authority to a Federal Authority changes the branch the unit belongs to despite the laws stating that when the National Guard are in a active duty role (including overseas in a Congress sanctioned wars) they are the Army National Guard, and not simply the U.S. Army, also we aren't questioning the Constitutionality of them being deployed overseas, or the Forefather's intention for the branch, since that isn't the point. Also, even you have to admit this debate, argument, how ever you feel to call it, has gotten way out of hand, and is serving no other purpose other then for us to see who's better in the end.

No. You are wrong. If you want to stop debating, leave. [editline]05:52PM[/editline] And the National Guard came about in like 1903 dude. [editline]05:53PM[/editline] The Forefathers didn't design it.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16587423]No. You are wrong. If you want to stop debating, leave.[/QUOTE] I really really don't care anymore, I could give less of a damn if I'm wrong or right, this starting out as a issue of rather the national guard is deployed overseas, which technically they are, but apparently they aren't legally, anyway, you're the one making it such a big issue over some trivial fact about something we could care less about. And please explain to me and my infant mind why I should Leave, I made this thread did I not, It wasn't my intention for this thread to end up with 1 post by you for every post made by everyone else, the intention was to simply post this, debunk it before someone else posts it, and then ridicule the WND for being fucking stupid and actually putting up bill boards in Louisiana questioning Obama's citizenship.

[quote]* Oppose restrictions on firearms[/quote] f I'm a terrorist

[QUOTE=Lankist;16587423]And the National Guard came about in like 1903 dude. [editline]05:53PM[/editline] The Forefathers didn't design it.[/QUOTE] Way to go, Lankist, Way to fucking go, you're are just finding shit to debate about.

[QUOTE=Broseph_;16587614]Way to go, Lankist, Way to fucking go, you're are just finding shit to debate about.[/QUOTE] 54 NATIONAL GUARDS NOT 50 you tard

Because you are contributing nothing to the thread but trolling.

Also what the fuck, are with these idiots missing the information I posted under the article, or are they just playing into it. [editline]05:02PM[/editline] [QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;16587634]54 NATIONAL GUARDS NOT 50 you tard[/QUOTE] I should have seen that coming. [editline]05:05PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Lankist;16587646]Because you are contributing nothing to the thread but trolling.[/QUOTE] Was that reply really needed?

[QUOTE=Broseph_;16587614]Way to go, Lankist, Way to fucking go, you're are just finding shit to debate about.[/QUOTE] Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. You said something that was completely and utterly [i]wrong.[/i] Not an opinion, you stated what you believed to be a fact, which was in reality easily falsifiable bunk. What's more, you used in in your argument. Lankist is now the bad guy because he directly refuted that argument using the fact that that information was wrong. Despite the fact that this is the proper method of dealing with an argument, he's in the wrong because rather than accept your bullshit he exposed it as bullshit.

Y'all are trolls trolling trolls.

[QUOTE=Xenocidebot;16587875]Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. You said something that was completely and utterly [i]wrong.[/i] Not an opinion, you stated what you believed to be a fact, which was in reality easily falsifiable bunk. What's more, you used in in your argument. Lankist is now the bad guy because he directly refuted that argument using the fact that that information was wrong. Despite the fact that this is the proper method of dealing with an argument, he's in the wrong because rather than accept your bullshit he exposed it as bullshit.[/QUOTE] Bro, I just want this debate about the god damn national guard to fucking stop at this point, it's gotten way out of hand. Once we get off the topic of the National Guard, this thread can be salvageable hopefully.

I am not your bro, chumbowski. If you really wanted to "salvage" the thread, you'd have started talking about something else, instead of trolling people telling them that it's their fault the thread sucks.

[QUOTE=Xenocidebot;16588466]I am not your bro, chumbowski.[/QUOTE] Vee believe in nossing, chumbowski, nossing.

Broseph: LANKIST. IS. A. TROLL. WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND FOR YOU.

[QUOTE=DeadMollusk;16589078]Broseph: LANKIST. IS. A. TROLL. WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND FOR YOU.[/QUOTE] Hey guys I have specialized education in this particular field of study, what some might call credible expertise. TROLL TROLL DONT REPLY HES A TROLL

I honestly don't see how he's a troll. Just because some is opinionated doesn't mean they're a troll.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16589263]Hey guys I have specialized education in this particular field of study, what some might call credible expertise. TROLL TROLL DONT REPLY HES A TROLL[/QUOTE] Really, what draws you to this thread so much, and why do you have to reply to every damn post?

[QUOTE=Broseph_;16589392]Really, what draws you to this thread so much, and why do you have to reply to every damn post?[/QUOTE] Reveling

[QUOTE=Lankist;16589411]Reveling[/QUOTE] Are you trying to make me rage and get my self banned or what.

[QUOTE=Broseph_;16589454]Are you trying to make me rage and get my self banned or what.[/QUOTE] No I am trying to gloat about you being so unearthly wrong after you defended your wrongness vehemently for hours.

[QUOTE=Lankist;16589491]No I am trying to gloat about you being so unearthly wrong after you defended your wrongness vehemently for hours.[/QUOTE] So you're going to shit up the thread so you can gloat, that's sure is classy.

[QUOTE=Broseph_;16589454]Are you trying to make me rage and get my self banned or what.[/QUOTE] Wouldn't really be an accomplishment. You've been raging for eons in this thread. What did you call him? A rolling shit cunt?

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;16589608] What did you call him? A rolling shit cunt?[/QUOTE] Is that like rolling thunder? Personally, I think flaming piece of cockbacon is a better insult.