• Legal Child Porn Linked to Lower Child Sex Abuses
    221 replies, posted
Nevermind, I'm not even gonna bother arguing with an imbecile, someone else can continue doing it, unlike you, I have better things to do than destroying the gene pool.
[QUOTE=Woomp;34670112] That isn't that I said, I said there was no justification for being attracted to children because its morally wrong and I for one find it disgusting.[/QUOTE] they used to think homosexuality was morally wrong, I'm still waiting for an answer about how sexual orientation is 'justifiable'
[QUOTE=EBvulves;34670166]How could they 'legalize' child abuse?[/QUOTE] As it's been said several times, this isn't about real child porn, it's about drawn stuff like lolicon, which is legal in denmark and japan, and now this place.
[QUOTE=Crimor;34670175]Nevermind, I'm not even gonna bother arguing with an imbecile, someone else can continue doing it, I have better things to do than destroying the gene pool.[/QUOTE] You seem pretty pro-child porn.
[QUOTE=Woomp;34670154]I guess so, I woke up one morning drunk at a party and some girl was sucking my dick[/QUOTE] you said pussy not mouth
[QUOTE=Crimor;34670183]As it's been said several times, this isn't about real child porn, it's about drawn stuff like lolicon, which is legal in denmark and japan, and now this place.[/QUOTE] Good thing it ain't legal here. [editline]12th February 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=thisispain;34670196]you said pussy not mouth[/QUOTE] Yeah and then she started riding my dick once I agreed to this sudden dick sucking movement.
[QUOTE=Woomp;34670204]Good thing it ain't legal here. [/QUOTE] how exactly is making drawings illegal a good thing? they don't effect anybody
[QUOTE=Sanius;34670223]how exactly is making drawings illegal a good thing? they don't effect anybody[/QUOTE] It fuels them. I'd honestly rather pedo's get jailed.
[QUOTE=Woomp;34670243]It fuels them. I'd honestly rather pedo's get jailed.[/QUOTE] uh I'm pretty sure that giving pedophiles a safe sexual release does not fuel them in any way to sexually assault children in fact it does the exact fucking opposite
Pedophiles can't choose to be attracted to children. There is a [b]MASSIVE[/b] difference between a pedophile and a child molester.
[QUOTE=Sanius;34670275]uh I'm pretty sure that giving pedophiles a safe sexual release does not fuel them in any way to sexually assault children in fact it does the exact fucking opposite[/QUOTE] No it promotes it. [editline]12th February 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=geel9;34670283]Pedophiles can't choose to be attracted to children. There is a [b]MASSIVE[/b] difference between a pedophile and a child molester.[/QUOTE] Yes they can its a fucking fetish. You can get rid of fetish's by restriction.
Hi I'm woomp and I go against studies and state my biased opinions as absolute fact.
[QUOTE=Woomp;34670243]It fuels them.[/QUOTE] No proof of that. See the OP, it argues exactly the opposite. Also, that is the same argument that Jack Thompson uses against violent video games. In short, no it doesn't. [QUOTE]I'd honestly rather pedo's get jailed.[/QUOTE] But that's what we've been doing up until now. You could say that it isn't working. If something harmless can make actual child abuse less frequent, how on earth could you oppose it?
Because studies are wrong 99% of the time. Where is that study that shows guns = more crime.
[QUOTE=Woomp;34670310]Because studies are wrong 99% of the time.[/QUOTE] Well, from what I've seen, you're wrong 100% of the time.
woomp is making bad posts I see
[QUOTE=geel9;34670321]Well, from what I've seen, you're wrong 100% of the time.[/QUOTE] Ditto, opinions matter so much don't they. [editline]12th February 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Zeke129;34670326]woomp is making bad posts I see[/QUOTE] Zeke is pro-pedophilia I see.
[QUOTE=Woomp;34670332] Zeke is pro-pedophilia I see.[/QUOTE] Hello, fallacious arguments!
I can't argue with a battalion of pedo's. Marking this thread as unread.
Just drop it, he's obviously just trying to get you irritated.
yeah I didn't realise he was a troll until the last few posts. whoops
How come I've gotten such a limited response to my posts on page 3? Just a few people reacted to my posts, and I haven't even gotten a single rating. No dumbs, no nothing. I literally ask this question almost every time I get into a discussion like this. Every time I also point out that I've never gotten a clear answer. The longer nobody gives me anything I can use, the closer I get to the point where I just have to say [i]"Welp, I'm apperantly actually for child-adult sex."[/i] "What is it about sex that children cannot understand?" If there's something inherently harmful and incomprehensible about sex for kids, then I'll have to change my opinions. If children's inability to consent, and thus the harm, comes from society's attitude towards the whole issue, then it seems like the solution would rather be to change that attitude.
Regardless of this argument I cant wrap my head around legalizing CP. It just feels wrong to me, I know that does not really matter in a debate and I should be more open minded but I cant break the feeling that it is just not okay. I think we should do some more studies on the matter before making any drastic legal changes.
[QUOTE=Tacosheller;34667148]Duh, that's like saying legalizing murder lowers violent crimes. Unless they mean the drawn/artificial stuff, which is still a big 'duh'. If pedophiles have an outlet for their urges and it doesn't harm anyone, keep it legal. EDIT: How is this dumb? As fucking weird as lolicon is in most people's eyes, it harms nobody. If you disagree, please PM me. I'd like to hear you out. EDIT: No, really. I want to hear where I'm apparently going wrong with my opinion. EDIT:I've still yet to get a single message about the matter. Please, convince me why I'm wrong instead of just calling me an idiot. That's hardly a way to change someone.[/QUOTE] Could someone please tell me why I'm wrong here? My opinions seem to be exactly the same as everyone else in this thread.
[QUOTE=Tacosheller;34670700]Could someone please tell me why I'm wrong here? My opinions seem to be exactly the same as everyone else in this thread.[/QUOTE] the argument is legalizing x reduces the rate of y you're arguing that legalizing x reduces the rate of x
[QUOTE=Sanius;34670737]the argument is legalizing x reduces the rate of y you're arguing that legalizing x reduces the rate of x[/QUOTE] A Violent crime doesn't mean someone's murdered. However, child porn(sans the drawn stuff) means a child is still abused sexually(however, less so). The argument is exactly the opposite of what you said.
[QUOTE=Tacosheller;34670700]Could someone please tell me why I'm wrong here? My opinions seem to be exactly the same as everyone else in this thread.[/QUOTE] People've got to just be teasing you... I agree with your second statement, but your first statement less so. Legalizing the possession of child porn, even the real deal, is not like saying legalizing murder lowers violent crimes. The thing is, possessing real child porn is not the same as molesting a child, and I think you could even argue that it is a harmless crime, even if there are many issues connected to it. [I](I mean, even if possessing it isn't harmful, something harmful has to have happened since it exists.)[/I] But for the sake of the argument, let's say that child porn is merely [I]less[/I] harmful than child molestation. If child porn being legal lowers child abuse cases, then that means there would be an overall decrease of harmfulness. But in your comparison, there is no decrease in harmfulness.
Ah, so the argument is for the lessening of sex abuse than getting rid of it altogether. I see.
[QUOTE=Tacosheller;34670781]A Violent crime doesn't mean someone's murdered.[/QUOTE] yes but murder is a violent crime. in order for your analogy to work, possession of child porn would have to be harmful to children. it's not
Indeed, that's how I see it. Well, that just showed how useful the rating system can be, eh...
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.