• Legal Child Porn Linked to Lower Child Sex Abuses
    221 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Sanius;35488665]in a vacuum, yes I don't want a pedophile any where near my niece or my hypothetical future children[/QUOTE] i may be wrong but weren't you almost alienatingly liberal and pro-rights
I think child porn should remain outlawed. If it was proven to lower odds of real life child abuse (which sounds plausible) then just shoot porn with young adults around 18 and make them look younger than they actually are. Allowing kids to be in porn even if they are 16 or 17 sounds like an awful idea.
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;35499887]I think child porn should remain outlawed. If it was proven to lower odds of real life child abuse (which sounds plausible) then just shoot porn with young adults around 18 and make them look younger than they actually are. Allowing kids to be in porn even if they are 16 or 17 sounds like an awful idea.[/QUOTE] yeah i agree, but the article is talking about drawn stuff as opposed to real stuff
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;35499887]I think child porn should remain outlawed. If it was proven to lower odds of real life child abuse (which sounds plausible) then just shoot porn with young adults around 18 and make them look younger than they actually are. Allowing kids to be in porn even if they are 16 or 17 sounds like an awful idea.[/QUOTE] Yeah but there's a difference between legalizing the production of it, and legalizing the possession of it. Just like watching and possessing a video of someone being murdered is legal, but making such a video is illegal because it requires you to murder someone. [editline]9th April 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=CheeseMan;35499978]yeah i agree, but the article is talking about drawn stuff as opposed to real stuff[/QUOTE] Actually, it's talking about any kind of child porn, real or not, they only included a notice that they personally do not approve of real pornography. [I]"While the authors do not approve of the use of real children in the production or distribution of child pornography, they say that artificially produced materials might serve a purpose."[/I]
[QUOTE=CheeseMan;35499978]yeah i agree, but the article is talking about drawn stuff as opposed to real stuff[/QUOTE] Oh my mistake, I thought "artificially produced" meant porn made with people over 18 but made to look like they are underage, thanks for clearing out.
[QUOTE=Clavus;35488959]In my opinion, pedophilia is just another fetish / sexual orientation, however a very unfortunate one. Of course children should be protected from sexual actions, but demonizing pedophiles isn't going to make the issue go away. I believe there a hundred more pedophiles out there for every one that comes in the news, yet they restrain themselves and have sufficient social control around them. Really, throwing them a rope with harmlessly produced content is the least society could do.[/QUOTE] I hate how black and white it is. Like I've heard tons of people say fucked up shit regarding punishing pedophiles as if their fetish makes them literal demons from the 9th circle of hell or something. As long as they aren't the white van stalk grocery stores type then slow your roll. And then there's the wacky laws regarding consenting nudes your girlfriend and being permately labeled a sex offender.
[QUOTE=Clavus;35488959]In my opinion, pedophilia is just another fetish / sexual orientation, however a very unfortunate one. Of course children should be protected from sexual actions, but demonizing pedophiles isn't going to make the issue go away. I believe there a hundred more pedophiles out there for every one that comes in the news, yet they restrain themselves and have sufficient social control around them. Really, throwing them a rope with harmlessly produced content is the least society could do.[/QUOTE] Isn't pedophilia a physical problem and the result of some hormone irregularity that make people ludicrously horny to young children ?
If this thread is to continue, I think it would be appropriate for the title to be changed to something more accurate.
Real child porn should remain illegal as it still harms children. The main concern here is protecting children from exploitation. It should never ever be legal. I am 100% for making it illegal. Artificial child porn on the other hand, needs to be legal everywhere. It is not harming anyone. Children are not harmed by artificial child porn, nor are they involved in the creation of artificial child pornography, whether it's written or illustrated. The main problem with society today is that they treat pedophiles like society treated homosexuality hundreds of years ago. The difference of course, being that no one is harmed in the process when homosexuals acted out on their sexual desires. Obviously with pedophilia this is not true, as children are harmed and that party cannot consent legitimately due to their young age, with the addition of how society and culture views children. I am all for giving pedophiles anything that doesn't involve the exploitation or harm of children, either directly or indirectly, in anyway whatsoever. Given what I just said, any material fitting that criteria should be permissible. I really don't see a problem with that. Yes it's disgusting, but so is gay porn, scat porn, etc. IMO, pedophilia needs to be treated properly in a humane way. These people need help. They don't choose to have an attraction towards children. Locking them up and throwing away the key doesn't solve anything, sorry.
Can a mod change the title to "Legal [I]Lolicon[/I] Linked to Lower Child Sex Abuses", please? too many people are reading the title, then posting without actually reading the OP.
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;35501583]Isn't pedophilia a physical problem and the result of some hormone irregularity that make people ludicrously horny to young children ?[/QUOTE] In the same way any sexual taste is a hormone irregularity, yeah.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.