• NRA ad attacked for including President Obama's daughters
    103 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Kopimi;39250504][/QUOTE] THEY'RE NOT HUMANS
what's ridiculous is how much you care
[QUOTE=Ridge;39250557]THEY'RE NOT HUMANS[/QUOTE] thats why i said "human [B]targets[/B]" [QUOTE=ButtsexV3;39250569]what's ridiculous is how much you care[/QUOTE] idk if you think you're being snarky or clever or something by implying i'm fuming here but either way this is a silly reply i'm just saying the NRA is bein mad hypocritical, obviously i don't care about their game i care about them being a major policy advocate in the united states while being blatantly hypocritical about arguments they're currently levying
[QUOTE=Kopimi;39250341]and killing other humans has been done for thousands of years it's still killing humans. a human shaped target is designed to train someone and award them points for being able to hypothetically shoot someone in the face, no matter how long it's been going on[/QUOTE] Those targets are pretty much standard at 99% of shooting ranges. That's probably why they were chosen for the game.
[QUOTE=sedarahC;39251319]Those targets are pretty much standard at 99% of shooting ranges. That's probably why they were chosen for the game.[/QUOTE] That's really not the point he's trying to make, as has been stated many times.
[QUOTE=Dalndox;39251787]That's really not the point he's trying to make, as has been stated many times.[/QUOTE] then he's not really making a point at all
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;39251862]then he's not really making a point at all[/QUOTE] are you being passive aggressive or did you honestly miss the point i've stated multiple times: that human shaped targets still represent the ability to kill a human being and its hypocritical to complain about violent video games while putting out a video game centered around shooting human shaped targets and earning points for shooting vital parts of a human body
[QUOTE=Sir_takeslot;39244735]You should tell that to all those anti-gun people who are pushing their agenda over peoples dead children.[/QUOTE] The media likes Obama, so that's different. (I fucking hate the mainstream media.)
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;39250569]what's ridiculous is how much you care[/QUOTE] Same could be said about you and your guns :v: [editline]17th January 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=viper shtf;39252200]The media likes Obama, so that's different. (I fucking hate the mainstream media.)[/QUOTE] Fox News seems like it's RIGHT up your alley then.
It's okay to use dead children to push an agenda, but it's not okay to point out the hypocrisy specifically relating to the president's children.
[quote]“Most Americans agree that a president’s children should not be used as pawns in a political fight,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said. “But to go so far as to make the safety of the President’s children the subject of an attack ad is repugnant and cowardly.”[/quote] But it's okay for other people's children to be used as pawns in a political fight, even if they were shot by some scumbag! Fucking idiots.
Do they want an unguarded President, so anyone can just take the Football?
What do they want, the President to go unguarded? If so they should just start handing out H-Bombs now... [editline]17th January 2013[/editline] Weird, double post. Oh wait, I see the post I made earlier [b]DID[/b] get sent. Sorry about that.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.