Take a guess as to which news outlet called Wikipedia a "worldwide network of pedophiles". - Polidicks

I actually thought of the Daily Mail first. They have a certain fixation with "paedophilic monsters". Ah! But I should have been tipped off by the American spelling of 'pedophile' in the title.

I bet some idiot parents will go "omg, block wikipedia for the safety of our childeren".

[QUOTE=killz2much;22892783]Someone at Fox News logged on to Encyclopedia Dramatica and confused it with Wikipedia.[/QUOTE] They didn't confuse it they just ignored it.

If there is a debate over paedophilia shouldn't they show BOTH SIDES of the argument? Fox wants a fair and balanced view by telling them oh your evil and shops he hung on a cross for the good lord Jesus Christ!

I love how these news stories portray paedophiles like some sort of organised network,with a fucking agenda. Like they have a fucking monthly meeting to discuss how to get to more children faster. WE ARE THE PAEDOMAFIA

[QUOTE=codenamecueball;22895715]If there is a debate over paedophilia shouldn't they show BOTH SIDES of the argument? [b]Fox[/b] wants a [b]fair and balanced view[/b] by telling them oh your evil and shops he hung on a cross for the good lord Jesus Christ![/QUOTE] :regd09:

[QUOTE=Cluckyx;22895737]I love how these news stories portray paedophiles like some sort of organised network,with a fucking agenda. Like they have a fucking monthly meeting to discuss how to get to more children faster. WE ARE THE PAEDOMAFIA[/QUOTE] "sheperd we located the paedo base we need you to take it over" lol was thinking of your avatar and what you said then this came up

what's next? Encyclopedia Britannica is housing terrorists who use the site to discuss methods of bomb making and plan major terror acts? Seriously, Wikipedia is an ENCYCLOPEDIA, it is their JOB to have articles on all political parties in the world, even if they have only 3 members and advocate consensual sex between adults and children. I mean, they even have an article on the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster which is a parody religion used to make fun of creationism. If there's an external link to a site that houses pedophiles and has a history of being linked to cases of child molestation, it is the job of the people who edit wikipedia to remove the link, and for the moderators to keep the link off the page.

[QUOTE=robmaister12;22896002] If there's an external link to a site that houses pedophiles and has a history of being linked to cases of child molestation, it is the job of the people who edit wikipedia to remove the link, and for the moderators to keep the link off the page. [B]AND THEY FAILED TO EXECUTE SUCH ACTION![/B][/QUOTE] See how easy fox's job is?

[QUOTE=JDK721;22892565]took me 1/10 of a second to figure out it was them[/QUOTE] Slow thinker [QUOTE=lolwutdude;22894581]and yet, i bet fox news uses wikipedia for their sources[/QUOTE] If so, they'd sound a lot more intelligent.

"Take a guess as to which news outlet" That's how long it took me to figure it out.

[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;22895754]:regd09:[/QUOTE] im pointing out that fox's view is fucking retarded

-snip-

Ooohhhh I know, let's pretty much link websites that could possibly let people get a hold of CP in our lovely news article, what a great idea!

The irony is that the article by Fox News provides viewers with links to pedophilia sites comprising child porn :angry:.

[QUOTE=Cluckyx;22895737]I love how these news stories portray paedophiles like some sort of organised network,with a fucking agenda. Like they have a fucking monthly meeting to discuss how to get to more children faster. WE ARE THE PAEDOMAFIA[/QUOTE] Like Oprah talking about all the penises that want to rape your kids?

I would like to see these pedo articles on wikipedia.

[quote=fucktard news]"normalize" pedophile behavior in the public eye and to recruit more pedophiles into their community.[/quote] what, are they fucking insane!? FUCK fox news. They're fucking insane... "herp derp, all'a Wikipedia mods arr pedophiaflies" "well, fuck you, Fox News, you can't even pronounce Child Fucker properly, why should we believe you? how can they claim this is normal chat content when there's only two articles that could include such a subject (children and pedophilia)? Wow, just fuking wow.

If Wikipedia can be seriously used by pedophiles, I wonder how comes that Facebook founders aren't already in jail.

Ahahaha. Fox News.. Oh dear.

[QUOTE=wonkadonk;22892606]How come they aren't accusing conservapedia of being pedos? I mean seriously, this guy is its top contributor: [IMG]http://www.conservapedia.com/images/b/bc/Ed_poor_grinning.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] Is this his brother? [img]http://listentoleon.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/josef_fritzl.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=ExplodingGuy;22894133]Fox News: The Internet is ran by Paedophiles! CNN: Paedophiles gain support in suing for more rights.[/QUOTE] nice touch.

[QUOTE=Dr. Fishtastic;22892741][IMG_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/Jimmy_Wales_Fundraiser_Appeal_edit.jpg[/IMG_thumb] The face of a pedophile[/QUOTE] Is that Nick from L4D2? [IMG]http://bulk.destructoid.com/ul/153538-attention-everyone-buying-l4d2-i-have-dibs-on-nick/Clipboard01-noscale.jpg[/IMG] Also, [IMG]http://i488.photobucket.com/albums/rr247/Lemmiwinks1975/picard-facepalm.jpg[/IMG]

You know your news network is unreliable when everyone already knows who it is before it's even mentioned.

"Take a guess as to which news outlet called Wikipedia a "worldwide network of pedophiles"." Fox news. *reads* :dance:

[QUOTE=wonkadonk;22892606]How come they aren't accusing conservapedia of being pedos? I mean seriously, this guy is its top contributor: [img]http://www.conservapedia.com/images/b/bc/Ed_poor_grinning.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Isn't the owner of conservapedia the one who reported Wikimedia to the FBI for CP related crimes?

[url]http://www.wikisposure.com/Wikipedia_Campaign[/url] :colbert:

[QUOTE=lazyguy;22900826][url]http://www.wikisposure.com/Wikipedia_Campaign[/url] :colbert:[/QUOTE] From that page: [quote]The law in Santa Monica, CA allows ten year old to swim in the ocean nude. [/quote] For people who try so hard to get accepted into society, they aren't exactly helping their cause with remarks like this. Edit: Oh god, also from that page. From a paragraph regarding harrassing Wikipedia admins who've blocked known pedos. They tell them to call someone and recite, among other things, this: [quote]Paedophile activism is not illegal.[/quote] The law begs to differ.

Why does Fox think everyone is a pedophile?

No wonder there are so many gun toating crazies in America, news sites like this are making everyone there paranoid.