Battlefield 3 info onslaught begins with Game Informer cover - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Erebus.;27842389]It seems like everyone says this in every single Battlefield 3 thread. Hardly any info has been released about the game and the info that was released shows that DICE really wants the PC version to be the best.[/QUOTE] They also just killed off 2 other projects. 1943 is a remake of the game that we supported to let them continue the Battlefield franchise. I admit it could be great, but I'm not getting my hopes up.

Ohfuckfuckfuckfuckfuck :gizz: The king has returned. [editline]4th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;27842324]6 billion people in one server[/QUOTE] Our grenades will blot out the sun.

[QUOTE=garrynohome;27842414]They also just killed off 2 other projects. 1943 is a remake of the game that we supported to let them continue the Battlefield franchise.[/QUOTE] If I am not mistaken 1943 and Onslaught didn't sell well on their own. So why put effort into projects that wouldn't sell well/be well received when they could be putting work into a guaranteed winner.

[img]http://images.wikia.com/callofduty/images/8/8a/CoD4_boxart.png[/img] [img]http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/xx350/doug_kuhn/Modern_Warfare_2_cover.png[/img] [img]http://img.hellbored.com/images/game/0/2/f11202.png[/img] [img]http://gyazo.com/05a57282008f5df7a1b02a12186c7ef8.png[/img] Not complaining necessarily, but yo what's the dealio

Read how to make a modern shooter on Cracked.

[QUOTE=Henry Townshend;27842474][img_thumb]http://images.wikia.com/callofduty/images/8/8a/CoD4_boxart.png[/img_thumb] [img_thumb]http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/xx350/doug_kuhn/Modern_Warfare_2_cover.png[/img_thumb] [img_thumb]http://img.hellbored.com/images/game/0/2/f11202.png[/img_thumb] [img_thumb]http://gyazo.com/05a57282008f5df7a1b02a12186c7ef8.png[/img_thumb] Not complaining necessarily, but yo what's the dealio[/QUOTE] Battlefield: sticking to an artstyle CoD: paid a janitor 2 bucks to design all covers

[url]http://www.cracked.com/article_18973_why-modern-war-fps-games-all-look-same-5Bchart5D.html[/url]

Maybe its just my fanboyism, but the Battlefield covers, while similar have more artistic flair. The CoD covers are set with the more drab, gritty colors you'd actually see in a warzone while the battlefield's are set to have more contrast.

[QUOTE=Novangel;27842454]Our grenades will blot out the sun.[/QUOTE] Then we will TK for planes in the shade

[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;27842209]I want 512 people in one server.[/QUOTE] why would you want that that wouldn't even be very much fun

*Crosses fingers for a secret Battlefield 2143 type game* PLease please please! I still play the first one!

Like seriously what if you got your whole team somehow to go sniper GOD DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;27842289]They've done WWII, Vietnam, modern age, and the future. What are they going to do, Battlefield: 1917? You sit in a trench for 3 weeks. Rats eat your food while you sleep. A shell lands in your trench. It was filled with chlorine gas. Respawn in 10 seconds[/QUOTE] They need to get back to their roots and make a WW2 battlefield game, it's been too long since 1942. Modern age is getting boring as fuck.

i'm so excited and so scared :ohdear:

[QUOTE=Orkel;27842594]They need to get back to their roots and make a WW2 battlefield game, it's been too long since 1942. Modern age is getting boring as fuck.[/QUOTE] They should just do a timeline style battlefield game, certain maps from certain Eras and wars.

Please Revisit BF 2142. That game was so ahead of its time.

[QUOTE=Orkel;27842594]They need to get back to their roots and make a WW2 battlefield game, it's been too long since 1942. Modern age is getting boring as fuck.[/QUOTE] No need to retread old territory. Something like Korea is good and it's been rarely used as a setting. [url]http://www.mobygames.com/game-group/korean-war-era-games[/url] I mean there's like only 9 games set in Korea compared to the hundreds of WWII games out there!

[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;27842634]They should just do a timeline style battlefield game, certain maps from certain Eras and wars.[/QUOTE] spaceman v nazis would be sick

[QUOTE=Superstormj;27842640]Please Revisit BF 2142. That game was so ahead of its time.[/QUOTE] :frown:

"DICE sets its sights on Call of Duty" This is the worst thing I could possibly read. I don't want a "CoD-Killer", I want a large scale BATTLEFIELD game.

[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;27842249]I'm getting tired of the modern age.[/QUOTE] Battlefield 2 2

[QUOTE=Henry Townshend;27842474][img_thumb]http://images.wikia.com/callofduty/images/8/8a/CoD4_boxart.png[/img_thumb] [img_thumb]http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/xx350/doug_kuhn/Modern_Warfare_2_cover.png[/img_thumb] [img_thumb]http://img.hellbored.com/images/game/0/2/f11202.png[/img_thumb] [img_thumb]http://gyazo.com/05a57282008f5df7a1b02a12186c7ef8.png[/img_thumb] Not complaining necessarily, but yo what's the dealio[/QUOTE] [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/archive/6/62/20100103084814!Battlefield2Cover.jpg[/img] BF did it first

I'll be honest and say I think MW2 and BF3 have the coolest ones

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;27842289]They've done WWII, Vietnam, modern age, and the future. What are they going to do, Battlefield: 1917? You sit in a trench for 3 weeks. Rats eat your food while you sleep. A shell lands in your trench. It was filled with chlorine gas. Respawn in 10 seconds[/QUOTE] No, they need to make Battlefield 2143 or one set even further into the future.

I cannot wait

[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;27842726]No, they need to make Battlefield 2143 or one set even further into the future.[/QUOTE] The problem with BF2142 is that the warfare is WWII with laser guns. The battlefield series is not conducive to an interesting prediction of the future.

Let's hope this one has actual destruction and not just blowing holes into walls until a building falls down. It says they're using an updated Frostbite engine.

[QUOTE=Bryanrocks01;27842182]Never played Bad Company. Should I play that before 3? I played 2.[/QUOTE] This isn't Bad Company 3.

[QUOTE=Orkel;27842594]They need to get back to their roots and make a WW2 battlefield game, it's been too long since 1942. Modern age is getting boring as fuck.[/QUOTE] You can only storm Normandy so many times before it starts to get tedious. Hell, when I even skip the intro scene to Saving Private Ryan now!

[QUOTE=Boba_Fett;27842802]This isn't Bad Company 3.[/QUOTE] I think he was saying he has not played any of the Bad Company games but he has played Battlefield 2.