Battlefield 3 info onslaught begins with Game Informer cover - Polidicks

I can't wait. I too am getting sick of modern war though.

[QUOTE=BigHeaded B;27842828]You can only storm Normandy so many times before it starts to get tedious. Hell, when I even skip the intro scene to Saving Private Ryan now![/QUOTE] every building is a RAGDOLL

Chest paddle warrior

What's with all the love for this alleged CoD killer that doesn't have a single iota of information released pertaining to it?

[img_thumb]http://cdn.fpcontent.net/fp/emoot/aaaaa.gif[/img_thumb]

I was hoping for a Bad Company in WW2, with atleast 64 players

[QUOTE=HolyCrusade;27842891]What's with all the love for this alleged CoD killer that doesn't have a single iota of information released pertaining to it?[/QUOTE] Because all Battlefield games are awesome.

[QUOTE=HolyCrusade;27842891]What's with all the love for this alleged CoD killer that doesn't have a single iota of information released pertaining to it?[/QUOTE] Because generally a sequel to a game many people loved is highly awaited? Seriously why would you even ask that

I need a new computer :crying:

[quote]a new animation system that originated from EA Sports, and environments that are more destructible than ever before.[/quote] Yes.. i loved blowing up houses on BFBC2, i can't wait to buy this game.

Jesus Christ another Modern Day "Tacticool" FPS? fuck this, I'll be playing Planetside:Next. BF2142 was awesome, shame they went the modern route.

Give me fucking [B]JETS[/b] and [b]Dedicated servers[/b]

I want BF1742

[QUOTE=Sporkfire;27842960]Jesus Christ another Modern Day "Tacticool" FPS? fuck this, I'll be playing Planetside:Next. BF2142 was awesome, shame they went the modern route.[/QUOTE] good i dont think any of us care

It's about time.

I would really like Alternate History BF. Like Battlefield 1962. Not Vietnam, Cold War. Or 1989. That would be awesome. With extra commander options like NBC weapons.

Make it possible to parachute from 2 feet above the ground. Radio in vehicles. Make it possible to constantly spawn kill people with jet or helos. Give horrible black hawk controls so everyone crash head first into the ocean. I want to be able to shot team mates in the back and steal their jet, then have a internal fight with the team mates for the rest of the map. I want to be commander of the battle and only help my own squad mates and don't give a fuck about the rest. I want 64 player matches. I want a remake of Gulf of Oman and Strike at Karkand "with jets".

[QUOTE=Batmoutarde;27842709][img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/archive/6/62/20100103084814!Battlefield2Cover.jpg[/img_thumb] BF did it first[/QUOTE] That's a tad different. It's a guy standing in the middle of a letter. While similar, the other ones share more commonalities. [editline]3rd February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Teracotta;27842586]*Crosses fingers for a secret Battlefield 2143 type game* PLease please please! I still play the first one![/QUOTE] They've already announced BF3 is a sequel to BF2. Plus you can clearly see it's modern weapons in the teaser picture there. :confused:

[QUOTE=Brage Nyman;27843142]Make it possible to parachute from 2 feet above the ground. Radio in vehicles. Make it possible to constantly spawn kill people with jet or helos. Give horrible black hawk controls so everyone crash head first into the ocean. I want to be able to shot team mates in the back and steal their jet, then have a internal fight with the team mates for the rest of the map. I want to be commander of the battle and only help my own squad mates and don't give a fuck about the rest. I want 64 player matches. I want a remake of Gulf of Oman and Strike at Karkand "with jets".[/QUOTE] :') reinstalling bf2

I hope they keep BF2's helicopter controls/mechanics instead of the shitty simplified flying of BC2

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;27842289]They've done WWII, Vietnam, modern age, and the future. What are they going to do?[/QUOTE] Battlefield: Stone age

fucking cd-roms 5 discs :argh:

[QUOTE=danelo;27843288]Battlefield: Stone age[/QUOTE] [img]http://lambiek.net/artists/o/ozkan_tayyar/ozkan_caveman.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=danelo;27843288]Battlefield: Stone age[/QUOTE] classes: rock thrower clubber fire maker hunter gatherer [QUOTE=Explosions;27843338][img_thumb]http://lambiek.net/artists/o/ozkan_tayyar/ozkan_caveman.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] some of which perfectly detailed in the picture posted 5 seconds before my post

Adding onto the alternate history version, I would love maps that are inventive and really test the players, some are more balanced to one side. Like Soviets have advantage on the ground, NATO in the air, and the US excluding NATO on the sea.

[QUOTE=BigHeaded B;27843355]classes: rock thrower clubber fire maker hunter gatherer some of which perfectly detailed in the picture posted 5 seconds before my post[/QUOTE] More like, classes: hunter gatherer

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;27843374]More like, classes: hunter gathereer[/QUOTE] you know damn well if they only had two classes people would complain! I hope they got the controls right for the teradactyls...

[QUOTE=BigHeaded B;27843393]you know damn well if they only had two classes people would complain! I hope they got the controls right for the teradactyls...[/QUOTE] I hope they can prevent idiots from using sticks against it. Always get lit on fire because some guy is butt hurt that he didn't get his teradactyl...

it can't be worse than turok's pterodactyl controls

[QUOTE=Zambies!;27843362]Adding onto the alternate history version, I would love maps that are inventive and really test the players, some are more balanced to one side. Like Soviets have advantage on the ground, NATO in the air, and the US excluding NATO on the sea.[/QUOTE] That would be great, if the game implemented a good way to have the players learn the peculiarities of both sides that lead to a balanced correlation of forces.