• Child porn addict jailed after visits to swimming pool
    419 replies, posted
[QUOTE=_Axel;46751420] Why should loli be illegal if it makes no difference?[/QUOTE] I don't believe it should be illegal. It probably warrants your PC being seized though, restrictions about being around children etc
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46751410]well too fucking bad there aren't any statistics on child porn because everyone knows it's fucking wrong without needing a graph to tell them "IF YOU AIN'T GOT A GRAPH, YOU AIN'T RIGHT"[/QUOTE] Child Porn is considered wrong from the empirical evidence that virtually every single child who ever got involved in child porn was coerced/forced into it. Since films and monitors aren't exactly part of the natural wonders of the world it's not part of our instinct and it's not hard coded into our systems that child porn or child molestation is bad, that conclusion came from examination of the facts that maybe rubbing your dick all over a prepubescent child wasn't the most healthy thing to do for you or for the kid.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46751428]The fact that you people need statistics just to understand the evil nature of child pornography is unbelievable.[/QUOTE] Real-life CP is evil because actual children are harmed by its production. That's not the case with loli, which does no inherent harm. You argue it does but have nothing to back it up, of course we're going to disagree with unsubstantiated punishments. Law is not something which should be taken lightly.
[QUOTE=_Axel;46751459] That's not the case with loli, which does no inherent harm.[/QUOTE] again, the guy this thread was about had both real and loli. No crossover you think?
[QUOTE=Crash155;46751433]Five star post[/QUOTE] you should probs educate yourself on the reprehensible things you're defending before making sick owns like that
[QUOTE=_Axel;46751459]Real-life CP is evil because actual children are harmed by its production. That's not the case with loli, which does no inherent harm. You argue it does but have nothing to back it up, of course we're going to disagree with unsubstantiated punishments. Law is not something which should be taken lightly.[/QUOTE] do you lack the understanding that there's no evidence or need for it because fucking kids is inherently wrong without a doubt?
[QUOTE=Appox;46751426]This guy who got arrested that this thread is about had loli and real images, who told a probation working about how he's assault a kid. Not really unsubstantiated. Just like you finding drawn kid stuff a laff isn't unsubstantiated I got picture proof[/QUOTE] A person having already molested children broke hi parole by having real and drawn child porn images, and said he would have had sex with a 14 year old if she indicated she want to. That does not mean loli porn makes people rape children. Where are the studies? Where's the actual evidence?
[QUOTE=gbtygfvyg;46751423]If I shoot people in videogames that also makes me a murderer :downs:[/QUOTE] Not even comparable lmao
[QUOTE=_Axel;46751459]Real-life CP is evil because actual children are harmed by its production. That's not the case with loli, which does no inherent harm. You argue it does but have nothing to back it up, of course we're going to disagree with unsubstantiated punishments. Law is not something which should be taken lightly.[/QUOTE] holy shit the guy in the op article was jailed for possession of loli and he was talking to his probation officer about wanting to diddle a 14 year old kid. Is that link not good enough for you?
[QUOTE=Appox;46751464]again, the guy this thread was about had both real and loli. No crossover you think?[/QUOTE] Yeah, but what part of what he did was the actual crime? The actual CP of coerced children or the drawings? You already said it shouldn't be illegal. I don't really see what you're arguing for. Yes I think people who enjoy loli should be offered help, they simply shouldn't be punished for it because it's not a crime.
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;46751479]A person having already molested children broke hi parole by having real and drawn child porn images, and said he would have had sex with a 14 year old [B]if she indicated she want to[/B]. That does not mean loli porn makes people rape children. [/QUOTE] [quote]He told Ms McCabe that if the girl had asked him to go somewhere he'd have "jumped at the chance" and went on to say what he'd have done to her sexually.[/quote] he didn't say he'd fuck her 'if she wanted to', he said he'd rape her if she asked him to go somewhere. besides, 14 year olds arent considered to be able to consent. If she indicated she wanted it, it'd still be rape. Thats a whole other can of worms but, ykno?
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;46751479] Where are the studies? Where's the actual evidence?[/QUOTE] i saw an article about a pedo who had real and loli images of children caught going to a swimming pool. Images don't 'make people rape children', but they are images of that. Also you openly have pedo fetishes so it's no surprise you want to try and normalize it.
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;46751479]A person having already molested children broke hi parole by having real and drawn child porn images, and said he would have had sex with a 14 year old if she indicated she want to. That does not mean loli porn makes people rape children. Where are the studies? Where's the actual evidence?[/QUOTE] I'm gonna hang this on my wall.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46751474]do you lack the understanding that there's no evidence or need for it because fucking kids is inherently wrong without a doubt?[/QUOTE] Are you addicted to strawmanning or have you simply failed reading comprehension? I'm not advocating fucking children, I'm saying actions which do not harm people shouldn't be considered crimes.
[QUOTE=papaya;46751482]holy shit the guy in the op article was jailed for possession of loli and he was talking to his probation officer about wanting to diddle a 14 year old kid. Is that link not good enough for you?[/QUOTE] ayy lmao top kek So if this guy has loli, and he wants to diddle a kid, that means literally everyone who likes loli does too? [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Shitposting / Meme reply" - Craptasket))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46751474]do you lack the understanding that there's no evidence or need for it because fucking kids is inherently wrong without a doubt?[/QUOTE] Yeah that's why Ancient Greece made pederasty a central point of their entire culture and education system. Our current civilization was smart enough to realize that putting your dick in prepubescent children was not healthy to any degree for anyone involve, but that's by no mean a natural conclusion that needs to evidence. This isn't "blood loss = death" or "you need to breathe to stay alive" levels of obvious, the reason our civilization has outlawed pedophilia is because there was some thought put into the decision.
[QUOTE=Crash155;46751501]ayy lmao top kek [/QUOTE] NICE DUDE
so are there any thoughts on this or [QUOTE=Dr. Gestapo;46751404]there are a bunch of clinical studies on the subject but this the only one i could find right now [url]http://www.paedofiles.com/main/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/12/pedophiles.pdf[/url] but yeah the link between pedophilia and sociopathic personality disorders is pretty well documented in psychology. keep in mind most of the subjects in these studies are convicted sex offenders, since it's unlikely that your average forum pedo will voluntarily take part in them, but the science is pretty solid. [editline]a[/editline] to elaborate, you can't have *just* pedophilia in the same way you can't only have a pathological need for order like in OCD, the human mind doesn't wok like that. these are all traits present in "clusters" of different disoders, e.g. narcissistic personality disorder, borderline personality disorders, etc.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Crash155;46751501]ayy lmao top kek So if this guy has loli, and he wants to diddle a kid, that means literally everyone who likes loli does too?[/QUOTE] Yes, and you proved it in that stupid sentence to try and one up papaya. gg
[QUOTE=Appox;46751495]i saw an article about a pedo who had real and loli images of children caught going to a swimming pool. Images don't 'make people rape children', but they are images of that. Also you openly have pedo fetishes so it's no surprise you want to try and normalize it.[/QUOTE] Stop fucking calling me a paedophile you prick. I'm just trying to get people to stop demonising people who need help, to realise that loli porn doesn't make people rape children. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Flaming" - Craptasket))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Cone;46751519]so are there any thoughts on this or[/QUOTE] If we managed to go past the people who advocate thought policing, maybe we would be able to discuss more interesting matters.
[QUOTE=Crash155;46751501]ayy lmao top kek So if this guy has loli, and he wants to diddle a kid, that means literally everyone who likes loli does too?[/QUOTE] yes? wanking to loli means you're sexually attracted to little kids being sexually attracted to something usually means you wanna fuck it, or would be willing to fuck it given the chance
[QUOTE=papaya;46751532]yes?[/QUOTE] Have you failed maths? You don't demonstrate something by example.
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;46751530]Stop fucking calling me a paedophile you prick.[/QUOTE] [img]http://i.imgur.com/tBz5rPm.png[/img] Nah.
[QUOTE=Wootman;46751525]Yes, and you proved it in that stupid sentence to try and one up papaya. gg[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=papaya;46751532]yes?[/QUOTE] Ayyy I love me some generalizations
[QUOTE=papaya;46751532]yes?[/QUOTE] Generalization fallacy Fallacies don't start to work because you think you're right.
Same arguments, same people, same regurgitated bullshit I see in any thread involving kids. Can we ever have a thread where people aren't vehemently arguing about the legality of loli shit? Article's plain and simple, he had real CP, and described to his probation officer all the stuff he'd do. How people even started comparing/citing "guro" (literally fucking what) to anything is beyond me, and people some of the logic applied here is dumb as fuck. Some people here need to [I]legitimately[/I] get checked out by a doctor or something.
[QUOTE=Crash155;46751540]Ayyy I love me some generalizations[/QUOTE] Sorry but you are an idiot. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Flaming" - Craptasket))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;46751530]Stop fucking calling me a paedophile you prick.[/QUOTE] [img]http://i.imgur.com/GLRr9BI.png[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/gAj6zqb.png[/img] ?
[QUOTE=Wootman;46751547]Sorry but you are an idiot.[/QUOTE] Pot meet kettle
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.