Child porn addict jailed after visits to swimming pool
419 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;46750687]As long as no one is actually hurt I don't think [i]anything[/i] should be banned. Paedophilia is gross, gore is gross, vore is gross, I think BDSM is gross. I don't want any of them banned, and as long as everyone involved has given consent, or is [i]fucking fictional[/i], I don't care if it happens.
Moral outrage is not reason enough for a thing to be made illegal, no matter how outraged you become.[/QUOTE]
who said anything about banning stuff? not me! not me at all. you'd best prick up your ears, buddy!
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46750712]Being mentally unstable is different from being insane, you're the one making the resemblance
what the fuck lmao[/QUOTE]
And you're the one grasping at straws to the point where you're willing to make a difference between insane and mentally unstable in a forum post
You also can't measure sanity with someone's sexual fetishes, by that extent literally everyone and everything that has a brain is insane to some sort of moral standard.
There are psychiatric treatments for pedophiles who need help controlling their urges, by the way.
[QUOTE=Crash155;46750699]You just said that if you like guro, your mentally unstable
Backpedal harder[/QUOTE]
you know you're fighting a losing battle when all you are doing is arguing semantics
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;46750728]And you're the one grasping at straws to the point where you're willing to make a difference between insane and mentally unstable in a forum post[/QUOTE]
What does this even mean, of course being mentally unstable is different from being literally insane, he's saying things to me about things I didn't even say
what
[QUOTE=Cone;46750723]who said anything about banning stuff? not me! not me at all. you'd best prick up your ears, buddy![/QUOTE]
I never said it was good, I never said it was right. I said seeing children being raped doesn't make you want to rape children, just as seeing people getting shot doesn't make you want to shoot people.
Pedophile apologists ARE insane
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;46750717]Well yeah life isn't all about having good opportunities, sometimes you're dealt a shit hand and you gotta do the best of a horrible situation.[/QUOTE]
But should a person who knows they are not actually going to touch a kid, undergo castration because they like loli?
As long as one knows that they wouldnt do anything to a kid in real life, there is no problem.
Once they get worried that they could do it, then there is a problem.
[QUOTE=Doom64hunter;46750763]Pedophile apologists ARE insane[/QUOTE]
Alright, we get your opinion.
Now how about your arguments.
[QUOTE=Marzipas;46750744]you know you're fighting a losing battle when all you are doing is arguing semantics[/QUOTE]
You know you're fighting a losing battle when you shitpost, claim everyone is insane, and hide behind cover to further claim you're right
It's also good to know it's the same 4-5 people who are doing exactly this
[QUOTE=Str4fe;46750764]But should a person who knows they are not actually going to touch a kid, undergo castration because they like loli?
As long as one knows that they wouldnt do anything to a kid in real life, there is no problem.
Once they get worried that they could do it, then there is a problem.[/QUOTE]
No one's actually suggested that in this thread yet.
Somewhat surprisingly.
[QUOTE=Str4fe;46750764]But should a person who knows they are not actually going to touch a kid, undergo castration because they like loli?
As long as one knows that they wouldnt do anything to a kid in real life, there is no problem.
Once they get worried that they could do it, then there is a problem.[/QUOTE]
I never said anything about loli when it comes to castration. That should only apply to cases where the fetish reaches desire with actual children.
What the fuck happened to this site
lmao pedos
[QUOTE=DrTaxi;46750776]Alright, we get your opinion.
Now how about your arguments.[/QUOTE]
Child porn is bad, is there a counter-argument for that? I hope not because you'd be advocating children getting fucked, regardless of its "reality".
[QUOTE=Marzipas;46750744]you know you're fighting a losing battle when all you are doing is arguing semantics[/QUOTE]
What loss? Where are the arguments in support of banning loli?
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if the people in this thread who claim loli porn is as bad as real life child porn turned out to be the same people who call furries zoophiles. Seems to be on the same level of idiocy.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46750802]Child porn is bad, is there are counter-argument for that? I hope not because you'd be advocating children getting fucked, regardless of its "reality".[/QUOTE]
Your argument that somehow wanking to a drawn picture of a non-existent kid getting fucked is as bad as wanking to, or actually molesting a real child is idiotic and takes stupid shortcuts that no argument should take.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46750802]Child porn is bad, is there are counter-argument for that? I hope not because you'd be advocating children getting fucked, regardless of its "reality".[/QUOTE]
Loli doesn't harm children, though. Which is why the illegality of the thing is questionable.
[QUOTE=CrucialSeBBi;46750794]What the fuck happened to this site[/QUOTE]
Shitposting has been regarded as an acceptable argument
[QUOTE=Crash155;46750787]You know you're fighting a losing battle when you shitpost, claim everyone is insane, and hide behind cover to further claim you're right
It's also good to know it's the same 4-5 people who are doing exactly this[/QUOTE]
except he didn't use the word insane as there is a big fucking difference between mental instability and outright insanity and he's only saying people who are aroused by depictions of children are mentally unstable to a degree.
All we are saying, and yes, some may not use the right words, but all this boils down to, is that to find depictions of children as an adult to be arousing, is wrong, people like this need help.
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;46750807]I honestly wouldn't be surprised if the people in this thread who claim loli porn is as bad as real life child porn turned out to be the same people who call furries zoophiles. Seems to be on the same level of idiocy.[/QUOTE]
That's because they are the same people, Ganerumo
[QUOTE=CrucialSeBBi;46750794]What the fuck happened to this site
lmao pedos[/QUOTE]
"People concerned about abusive legislation = pedos."
I thought Scandinavian people would be better educated on the matter.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46750802]Child porn is bad, is there are counter-argument for that? I hope not because you'd be advocating children getting fucked, regardless of its "reality".[/QUOTE]
Child porn is bad because it harms children. Loli does not harm children, you are free to find it repulsive but that does not make your claims that it somehow incites child rape true.
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;46750792]I never said anything about loli when it comes to castration. That should only apply to cases where the fetish reaches desire with actual children.[/QUOTE]
What if the fetish reaches desire with actual children, yet they still know they wouldnt touch a kid?
I think desires are okay. When one considers to actually do something to children, then it is not okay, and yes, then chemical castration is a thing to consider.
[QUOTE=Doom64hunter;46750763]Pedophile apologists ARE insane[/QUOTE]
Yeah, because imprisoning people based solely on their fantasies is the sane thing to do.
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;46750807]Your argument that somehow wanking to a drawn picture of a non-existent kid getting fucked is as bad as wanking to, or actually molesting a real child is idiotic and takes stupid shortcuts that no argument should take.[/QUOTE]
You are defending masturbation to a child getting fucked. It doesn't fucking matter if it's real or not, it's a child getting fucked and THAT'S FUCKED UP TO DO BECAUSE WANKING TO CHILDREN IS NOT A GOOD THING.
[QUOTE=CrucialSeBBi;46750794]What the fuck happened to this site
lmao pedos[/QUOTE]
I think this thread is only still open because it's an cull to find all the pedos
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46750852]You are defending masturbation to a child getting fucked. It doesn't fucking matter if it's real or not, it's a child getting fucked and THAT'S FUCKED UP TO DO BECAUSE WANKING TO CHILDREN IS NOT A GOOD THING.[/QUOTE]
Does that mean it should be illegal?
[QUOTE=JohnFisher89;46750853]I think this thread is only still open because it's an cull to find all the pedos[/QUOTE]
I hope this was true.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46750802]Child porn is bad, is there a counter-argument for that? I hope not because you'd be advocating children getting fucked, regardless of its "reality".[/QUOTE]
The reason [I]real[/I] children getting fucked is bad because it harms them.
For which counter-arguments (that I in no way agree with) would be that either sex with children is not harmful to them or that there's nothing wrong with harming children.
But for fictional children, no harm done.
[QUOTE=JohnFisher89;46750853]I think this thread is only still open because it's an cull to find all the pedos[/QUOTE]
That doesn't seem to be effective because I haven't seen any yet.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.