[QUOTE=bravehat;28835212]Sadly overkill bombardments aren't on the table since we generally dislike bombing populated areas.[/QUOTE]
Dresden called - they want your indifference over civilian casulties back.
[QUOTE=Falchion;28835176]If Nato wanted gaddafi dead right now, he would be.
I wonder why this has not happened already. Probably SINISTER POLITICAL REEEASOOONS.
Edit: :tinfoil:[/QUOTE]It's the Libyan people who should be the ones to tighten the noose around his neck. For closure, for justice; it should not be dispensed with a smart bomb imo.
[QUOTE=Contag;28835228]Dresden called - they want your indifference over civilian casulties back.[/QUOTE]
No dude I agree that overkill bombardments are a bad idea, that's why there was a general tone of disdain there, as sarcasm and parody :v:
[QUOTE=bravehat;28835246]No dude I agree that overkill bombardments are a bad idea, that's why there was a general tone of disdain there, as sarcasm and parody :v:[/QUOTE]
Ah okay, it also makes it a tad harder to convince the population that you are liberating them (from their dictator, not their bodies).
On the plus side, there are far less people to convince! :v:
Ohohoh you! :v:
But yeah we should really just flatten the libyan armed forces, or whatever remains of them and then just confine Gadaffi to a certain area and constantly monitor him and tell the libyan people where they are, then leave it up to the rebels and ro gadaffi supporters to fight it out.
It's their country, we'll just make it an even playing field.
America has always interfered with foreign countries with no hesitation. Not implying it's always bad.
[QUOTE=Falchion;28835628]America has always interfered with foreign countries with no hesitation. Not implying it's always bad.[/QUOTE]
Before the second world war america didn't get involved in anyone shit, without being attacked herself.
This is a journalists wet dream.
[editline]27th March 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=bravehat;28835642]Before the second world war america didn't get involved in anyone shit, without being attacked herself.[/QUOTE]
Except maybe... the first world war.
[QUOTE=Killuah;28835659]This is a journalists wet dream.
[editline]27th March 2011[/editline]
Except maybe... the first world war.[/QUOTE]
Well German Submarines were attacking American ships.
[QUOTE=ThePutty;28824010]Thank god we're bombing the Gaddafi supporting cunts
Sooner Gaddafi is in a noose the better[/QUOTE]
History (kindof) repeats itself.
Twin towers blown up, Osama is hanged for all of you to watch on youtube.
Now this shit, and let's kill the guy "who's responsible for it".
The organization that supported Gaddafi is still alive. Now do you know who those people are? How would you? Anyone who knows about it, are better friends with them than they are with you. They're not giving out the truth to the public. They help their own buddies, not you. Even if you are part of the people who make up their country.
For all you know, Gaddafi could be a puppet leader, and collaborates with the U.S. How can you prove otherwise? Who know's the truth about it? The corrupt organizations? Will they tell you the truth?
[QUOTE=Killuah;28835659]This is a journalists wet dream.
[editline]27th March 2011[/editline]
Except maybe... the first world war.[/QUOTE]
The german U boats sank the Lustinia, a passanger ship.
America jumped all over that shit.
[QUOTE=Otsegolation;28835732]History (kindof) repeats itself.
Twin towers blown up, Osama is hanged for all of you to watch on youtube.
Now this shit, and let's kill the guy "who's responsible for it".
The organization that supported Gaddafi is still alive. Now do you know who those people are? How would you? Anyone who knows about it, are better friends with them than they are with you. They're not giving out the truth to the public.
For all you know, Gaddafi could be a puppet leader, and collaborates with the U.S. How can you prove otherwise? Who know's the truth about it? The corrupt organizations? Will they tell you the truth?[/QUOTE]
I'm actually not real, you are currently in an Illuminati medical facility hooked up to a simulator, being studied.
[QUOTE=Otsegolation;28835732]History (kindof) repeats itself.
Twin towers blown up, Osama is hanged for all of you to watch on youtube.
Now this shit, and let's kill the guy "who's responsible for it".
The organization that supported Gaddafi is still alive. Now do you know who those people are? How would you? Anyone who knows about it, are better friends with them than they are with you. They're not giving out the truth to the public. They help their own buddies, not you. Even if you are part of the people who make up their country.
For all you know, Gaddafi could be a puppet leader, and collaborates with the U.S. How can you prove otherwise? Who know's the truth about it? The corrupt organizations? Will they tell you the truth?[/QUOTE]
Dude fucking seriously, go get some anti psychotics and some mood elavators cause god damnit you are suffering from some mind bending paranoia.
Oh btw the US government is using HAARP to listen to your thoughts.
[QUOTE=Contag;28835751]I'm actually not real, you are currently in an Illuminati medical facility hooked up to a simulator, being studied.[/QUOTE]
You can possibly be right, but think
They don't need to study me, unless you admit I'm a divine being. Humans are cheap to make, we got plenty of them. The value of life is less than nonsense. They can chop up and study as many humans as they want.
Now if my theory you quoted is true, how does that affect everyone? More than if yours was right. Both of our examples are possible, that is if your simulator actually exists and is perfect enough to fool me. Mine however, can be achieved using simpler technology than what you talked about.
So which theories is most valuable to people, considering that either could be true, which is a possibility?
Does yours get us anywhere, or would mine free people if it was true?
[b]Edit:[/b]
What's so hard about setting news stations to broadcast information to people, when you're the government and you can make it so only you decide what is shown on tv?
How hard is it to go somewhere and commit crimes, and then misinform people about what happened using tv, when all those people watching have never been where you did the crimes?
How can people know you're lying, when they have no evidence that whatever you did ever happened, except for the fact that you told them something happened?
And how hard is it to control other sources of information?
Information is power.
Why give out information knowing that people will act in a certain way about it, when you can change the information so they think and act in a way that is beneficial for you?
What stops you, morals? World leaders have none.
[QUOTE=Otsegolation;28835795]You can possibly be right, but think
They don't need to study me, unless you admit I'm a divine being. Humans are cheap to make, we got plenty of them. The value of life is less than nonsense. They can chop up and study as many humans as they want.
Now if my theory you quoted is true, how does that affect everyone? More than if yours was right. Both of our examples are possible, that is if your simulator actually exists and is perfect enough to fool me. Mine however, can be achieved using simpler technology than what you talked about.
So which theories is most valuable to people, considering that either could be true, which is a possibility?
Does yours get us anywhere, or would mine free people if it was true?[/QUOTE]
[B]e:34577902 SIMULATOR ERROR[/B]
[QUOTE=Otsegolation;28835795]You can possibly be right, but think
They don't need to study me, unless you admit I'm a divine being. Humans are cheap to make, we got plenty of them. The value of life is less than nonsense. They can chop up and study as many humans as they want.
Now if my theory you quoted is true, how does that affect everyone? More than if yours was right. Both of our examples are possible, that is if your simulator actually exists and is perfect enough to fool me. Mine however, can be achieved using simpler technology than what you talked about.
So which theories is most valuable to people, considering that either could be true, which is a possibility?
Does yours get us anywhere, or would mine free people if it was true?[/QUOTE]
...screw the meds we should just make it easier and bury you.
Gadaffi isn't some sort of mothership, killing him won't make all of his supporters stop. They'll keep on fighting.
[QUOTE=MachiniOs;28836002]Gadaffi isn't some sort of mothership, killing him won't make all of his supporters stop. They'll keep on fighting.[/QUOTE]
This is the case with normal organizations, but when the head has cultivated a cult of personality, and virtually deified themself, things are subtantially different.
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;28834745][img_thumb]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9104987/gadaffi.png[/img_thumb]
[editline]27th March 2011[/editline]
mspaint[/QUOTE]
'Like i give a shit' :v:
[QUOTE=Contag;28836037]This is the case with normal organizations, but when the head has cultivated a cult of personality, and virtually deified themself, things are subtantially different.[/QUOTE]
Did the Insurgents stop fighting when Saddam was hung?
[QUOTE=MachiniOs;28836329]Did the Insurgents stop fighting when Saddam was hung?[/QUOTE]He didn't deify himself like Gaddafi does. Add on top of that the coalition ground troops present; regardless of Saddam, they felt they were being conquered.
Gaddafi should be placed in a room with the images of the people he murdered 24/7.
[QUOTE=Turnips5;28828448]remember, cool guys don't look at explosions[/QUOTE]
Mind=Blown
Scumbags.
[QUOTE=bravehat;28835642]Before the second world war america didn't get involved in anyone shit, without being attacked herself.[/QUOTE]
Before that your country didn't have any kind of resources to interfere with ANYTHING :v:
If you look at it, most of the time before world war 1 you were still a small colony, at civil war or still exploring your frontiers.
[QUOTE=Falchion;28840062]Before that your country didn't have any kind of resources to interfere with ANYTHING :v:
If you look at it, most of the time before world war 1 you were still a small colony, at civil war or still exploring your frontiers.[/QUOTE]
And then pearl harbor OH SHIT WE GOTTA GO TO WAR NOW
Then in the next episode of the world series: Twin towers OH SHIT WE ARE NOT A COUNTRY OF PEACE BUT OF WAR
Hey guys, I'm selling some peace, anyone wanna buy?
No? No one ever buys peace?
Oh I see, you all bought war.
i too base my life around megadeth lyrics
[QUOTE=nikomo;28824542]Anyone remember that video of Saddam getting hanged?
Edit Gaddafi's face on top.[/QUOTE]
I've got a better idea. Cut off Gadaffi's head, find Saddam's body, cut off Saddam's head, glue Saddam's body and Gadaffi's head together, hang it and take a picture.
[QUOTE=MachiniOs;28836329]Did the Insurgents stop fighting when Saddam was hung?[/QUOTE]
Ba'athist activity certainly went down, but most of the insurgents fighting in Iraq were people who were oppressed by him previously (and external mujahideen).
[QUOTE=bravehat;28832895]I'm sorry but being a scared civilian suddenly justifies rape?
What the fuck kinda drugs are you taking?[/QUOTE]
For fuck's sake! READ MY GOD DAMN POSTS!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
