Lesbians given birth right - Polidicks

Imagine having lesbian parents, it's mindbending (ly awesome.)

[QUOTE=thisispain;17058312]Hey guys, I just got a great idea for a Porno...[/QUOTE] The sexy lesbian couple wants children, but scientist Bulge Manstrong has run out of test tubes?

nah man the sexy lesbians want a kid, but lets just say they need a test sample :gizz:

[QUOTE=thisispain;17058690]nah man the sexy lesbians want a kid, but lets just say they need a test sample :gizz:[/QUOTE] Yeah so they extract marrow from their bones and use it to form sperm and then fertilize one another with it. Sooo hot :gizz:

Well that's bullshit because gay's can't have birth rights seeing as they can't give birth, So some gay guys need to fight that bill because it is unfair to them.

[QUOTE=sleepyperson;17058769]Well that's bullshit because gay's can't have birth rights seeing as they can't give birth, So some gay guys need to fight that bill because it is unfair to them.[/QUOTE] That's like fighting an abortion bill because you can't get an abortion yourself.

[QUOTE=Alex_DeLarge;17058502]That's what I'm saying, it's ridiculous how Christianity has affected our culture in the year 2009. We've civilized enough to realize that sexuality should be a persons choice and they shouldn't be persecuted because of it.[/QUOTE] Christianity has nothing to do with people hating people who are different. Claiming otherwise is just shifting the blame. Just look at all the furry hate on these forums, most of the haters are atheists.

[QUOTE=ThePuska;17058896]Christianity has nothing to do with people hating people who are different. Claiming otherwise is just shifting the blame. Just look at all the furry hate on these forums, most of the haters are atheists.[/QUOTE] As history shows, morals changed when Christianity came into existence, so I'd bet my money on Christianity fucking everything up.

[QUOTE=ThePuska;17058896]Christianity has nothing to do with people hating people who are different. Claiming otherwise is just shifting the blame. Just look at all the furry hate on these forums, most of the haters are atheists.[/QUOTE] Furries are just funny to mess with.

[QUOTE=ThePuska;17058896]Christianity has nothing to do with people hating people who are different. Claiming otherwise is just shifting the blame. Just look at all the furry hate on these forums, most of the haters are atheists.[/QUOTE] No, that's a stupid thing to say. Most people hate furries, I doubt being Atheist makes any bearing on that.

[QUOTE=ThePuska;17058896]Christianity has nothing to do with people hating people who are different. Claiming otherwise is just shifting the blame. Just look at all the furry hate on these forums, most of the haters are atheists.[/QUOTE] just putting this out there on the table, take it or leave it, whatever, it's just a suggestion: you're dumb

[QUOTE=ThePuska;17058896]Christianity has nothing to do with people hating people who are different. Claiming otherwise is just shifting the blame. Just look at all the furry hate on these forums, most of the haters are atheists.[/QUOTE] That's different, gays are people, furriers are a subhuman blight that must be purged from our Earth in holy fire.

[QUOTE=Alex_DeLarge;17057894]I just believe we've evolved enough as a society to give the same rights as straight men/women to every other sexuality there is.[/QUOTE] We're "evolved" enough to abrogate the natural order of sexual reproduction? Maybe advanced technologically enough. [editline]12:54AM[/editline] [QUOTE=lmaoboat;17059017]That's different, gays are people, furriers are a subhuman blight that must be purged from our Earth in holy fire.[/QUOTE] You see, gays are people who choose to ignore their natural sexual capabilities and purpose.

[QUOTE=snuwoods;17059055]We're "evolved" enough to abrogate the natural order of sexual reproduction? Maybe advanced technologically enough. [/QUOTE] We were pretty "meh" about it 2400 years ago so why the hell not?

[QUOTE=Alex_DeLarge;17059074]We were pretty "meh" about it 2400 years ago so why the hell not?[/QUOTE] How about comparatively we were socially primitive?

[QUOTE=snuwoods;17059099]How about comparatively we were socially primitive?[/QUOTE] Actually quite the opposite, not much has changed other than slavery being abolished and women in certain governments have more rights. If you live in the United States, we derive from Athenian and Roman culture, just like every other modernized area on Earth, so yeah, we haven't changed much.

[QUOTE=Alex_DeLarge;17059137]Actually quite the opposite, not much has changed other than slavery being abolished and women in certain governments have more rights. If you live in the United States, we derive from Athenian and Roman culture, just like every other modernized area on Earth, so yeah, we haven't changed much.[/QUOTE] Unless you count the Dark Ages. :science: But really, you're right. Most modern civilizations are based on Greece and Rome. The Dark Ages were just when Church made logic and reason heresy.

[QUOTE=Alex_DeLarge;17059137]Actually quite the opposite, not much has changed other than slavery being abolished and women in certain governments have more rights. If you live in the United States, we derive from Athenian and Roman culture, just like every other modernized area on Earth, so yeah, we haven't changed much.[/QUOTE] I'm not quite sure you understand. Government doesn't always form societal views, etc.

[QUOTE=snuwoods;17059199]I'm not quite sure you understand. Government doesn't always form societal views, etc.[/QUOTE] We're going in circles now, society changed due to Christianity and religion really does impact governmental ideologies. I'm saying that society was fine with it 2400 years ago but due to "Christian values", sexual orientations other than the classic "man and woman" is taboo and it's shameful to see that we're having to go through this all over again.

[QUOTE=PvtCupcakes;17059193]Unless you count the Dark Ages. :science: But really, you're right. Most modern civilizations are based on Greece and Rome. The Dark Ages were just when Church made logic and reason heresy.[/QUOTE] Why so quick to blame the Church? [quote=wikipedia.org]Dark Ages? In the 19th century, the entire Middle Ages were called the "Dark Age", expressing contempt for an anti-scientific, priest-ridden, superstitious time. However, a radical reevaluation occurred in the early 20th century, based on the wealth of information from the High and Late Middle Ages. When historians now use the term "Dark Ages" to refer to the Early Middle Ages, it is intended to express the idea that the period seems "dark" only because of the shortage of historical records compared with later times. The stereotype of the entire Middle Ages as a "Dark Age" supposedly caused by the Christian Church for allegedly "placing the word of religious authorities over personal experience and rational activity" is called a caricature by the contemporary historians of science David Lindberg and Ronald Numbers,[46] who say "the late medieval scholar rarely experienced the coercive power of the church and would have regarded himself as free (particularly in the natural sciences) to follow reason and observation wherever they led. There was no warfare between science and the church".[47] Historian Edward Grant writes: "If revolutionary rational thoughts were expressed in the Age of Reason [the 18th century], they were only made possible because of the long medieval tradition that established the use of reason as one of the most important of human activities".[48] For example, the claim that people of the Middle Ages widely believed that the Earth was flat was first propagated in the 19th century[49] and is still very common in popular culture. This claim is mistaken, as Lindberg and Numbers write: "there was scarcely a Christian scholar of the Middle Ages who did not acknowledge [Earth's] sphericity and even know its approximate circumference."[49][50] Misconceptions such as: "the Church prohibited autopsies and dissections during the Middle Ages", "the rise of Christianity killed off ancient science", and "the medieval Christian church suppressed the growth of the natural sciences", are all reported by Numbers as examples of widely popular myths that still pass as historical truth, [b]even though they are not supported by current historical research.[/b][51][/quote]

[QUOTE=snuwoods;17059249]Why so quick to blame the Church?[/QUOTE] Throwing Galileo in prison for saying the Earth revolved around the Sun sure didn't help the Church's credibility. [editline]12:15AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Alex_DeLarge;17059226]We're going in circles now, society changed due to Christianity and religion really does impact governmental ideologies. I'm saying that society was fine with it 2400 years ago but due to "Christian values", sexual orientations other than the classic "man and woman" is taboo and it's shameful to see that we're having to go through this all over again.[/QUOTE] I'm pretty sure Socrates, as well as other Greek figures like Alexender were bisexual. So obviously something changed between then and now.

[QUOTE=PvtCupcakes;17059271] I'm pretty sure Socrates, as well as other Greek figures like Alexender were bisexual. So obviously something changed between then and now.[/QUOTE] You are correct, Socrates, the father of modern day philosophy and Alexander the Great were both bisexual because in their cultures, sexuality wasn't a taboo thing like it is today. Hell, there used to be an city-state on an island known as "Lesbos" that was dominated by women during that time period.

[QUOTE=PvtCupcakes;17059271]Throwing Galileo in prison for saying the Earth revolved around the Sun sure didn't help the Church's credibility. [editline]12:15AM[/editline] I'm pretty sure Socrates, as well as other Greek figures like Alexender were bisexual. So obviously something changed between then and now.[/QUOTE] Dominating small boys in order to seed them into pubescence is absolute nonsense. [quote=wikipedia.org]In many traditional Melanesian cultures a prepubertal boy would be paired with an older adolescent who would become his mentor and who would "inseminate" him (orally, anally, or topically, depending on the tribe) over a number of years in order for the younger to also reach puberty.[/quote] A lot of these relationships were with boys. Gross.

[QUOTE=lmaoboat;17059017]That's different, [b]gays are people[/b], furriers are a subhuman blight that must be purged from our Earth in holy fire.[/QUOTE] Lets not jump to conclusions.

[QUOTE=snuwoods;17059342]Dominating small boys in order to seed them into pubescence is absolute nonsense. A lot of these relationships were with boys. Gross.[/QUOTE] Aqueducts, democracy, science, philosophy, and art aren't though.

[QUOTE=ThePuska;17058896]Christianity has nothing to do with people hating people who are different. Claiming otherwise is just shifting the blame. Just look at all the furry hate on these forums, most of the haters are atheists.[/QUOTE] Most of the haters are atheists because 75% of Facepunch is made up of atheists.

[QUOTE=snuwoods;17059055]We're "evolved" enough to abrogate the natural order of sexual reproduction? Maybe advanced technologically enough. [editline]12:54AM[/editline] You see, gays are people who choose to ignore their natural sexual capabilities and purpose.[/QUOTE] We're being fucking overpopulated because 3rd world country people can't stop having sex either because of rape or stupidity. And who the fuck are paying for them? We are. I'm glad gay people exist because that's less one baby that'll never grow out of their teens because they'll starve to death. I fully believe gay people are nature's answer to humanity's overpopulation.

females no longer need males. it's over. they have been given birth rights they can make synthetic sperm from 2 eggs they can physically have children. we have 200 years at most is my guess

[QUOTE=Alex_DeLarge;17057751]Good, why the fuck is this just happening? It's the year 2009, I thought we evolved enough as a society to allow people to do whatever they want in terms of sexuality. During Ancient Greece, it was accepted so why the fuck are we going back?[/QUOTE] Because during Ancient Greece there wern't any funny people in the desert after the Roman Empire who decided to write a book during a bad harvesting year.

Damn the U.K. for being better than us.