• New Wolfenstein will last you 20 Hours, also 1080p and 60FPS on all platforms.
    128 replies, posted
[quote]Upcoming first-person shooter Wolfenstein: The New Order will take you around 20 hours to complete if you collect everything and explore all the environments the game has to offer.[/quote] And six hours if you play it like a normal player would. So basically a normal FPS campaign. [quote]Matthies also pointed out that Wolfenstein: The New Order (which does not have a multiplayer mode) will encourage you to play through the game again, "especially to explore the alternate timeline," he said. He went on to say that early on in the game players will make a choice that will open up an alternate timeline which "changes the vibe of the story." "It's recommended to do a second play through and see what would have happened if you chose differently," he said. It's unclear how the paths differ.[/quote] AKA "We couldn't make this game fun enough to play twice on a basis of fun so we've given you an arbitrary alternate ending bait to get you going through it again. [quote]"But MachineGames will never make both at the same time. We find that the best possible results come from having the whole team focused on a singular experience for the duration of the project," he said.[/quote] This much I do agree with, though. As someone who plays primarily single player games it's frustrating as hell when I pick up a new game and see all the corners they cut to put in the multiplayer bullshit. It might be good, it might not be. But it definitely isn't worth sixty of my US Dollars. Or even thirty. Fifteen is stretching it. I'll have to pass on this one, though I can admire a dev that realizes the effects trying to develop MP and SP in the same cycle has on both modes.
[QUOTE=Rika-chan;44789797][URL]http://www.cdkeys.com/pc/games/wolfenstein-the-new-order-pc-cd-key-steam[/URL] $39.58[/QUOTE] Yeah if you're buying on PC you definitely shouldn't buy straight from Steam anymore. There is always reliable CD key sites that sell the exact same keys as if you had bought the game at walmart down the road, and for half the price. I bought a pre-order for this game for a straight 29.99 (if you pre-order games a month or more ahead of time you can usually get it close to 30$ like I did.)
[QUOTE=TestECull;44791746]And six hours if you play it like a normal player would. So basically a normal FPS [/QUOTE] How do you go from 20 to 6? What's in those 14 hours? Remember this is 20 hours single play through not multiple
[QUOTE=TestECull;44791746]And six hours if you play it like a normal player would. So basically a normal FPS campaign. AKA "We couldn't make this game fun enough to play twice on a basis of fun so we've given you an arbitrary alternate ending bait to get you going through it again. This much I do agree with, though. As someone who plays primarily single player games it's frustrating as hell when I pick up a new game and see all the corners they cut to put in the multiplayer bullshit. It might be good, it might not be. But it definitely isn't worth sixty of my US Dollars. Or even thirty. Fifteen is stretching it. I'll have to pass on this one, though I can admire a dev that realizes the effects trying to develop MP and SP in the same cycle has on both modes.[/QUOTE] I don't see how you came to any of your conclusions here using rational thought
[QUOTE=TestECull;44791746] AKA "We couldn't make this game fun enough to It might be good, it might not be. But it definitely isn't worth sixty of my US Dollars. Or even thirty. Fifteen is stretching it. I'll have to pass on this one, though I can admire a dev that realizes the effects trying to develop MP and SP in the same cycle has on both modes.[/QUOTE] Have you watched any if the videos or live streams they've done of the game? Previews done by press as well.
But i want more than 60 fps on PC. and high res textures.
Also it isn't an 'alternate ending' depending on a choice, things change through out the game. They minor, but it isn't just an alternate ending.
good. anymore than twenty and i would of been pissed
[QUOTE=Skanic;44792144]But i want more than 60 fps on PC. and high res textures.[/QUOTE] can you even notice over 60fps? 60 is smooth enough as it is.
[QUOTE=Marzipas;44792277]can you even notice over 60fps? 60 is smooth enough as it is.[/QUOTE] It's Noticeable if you have a Monitor over 60Hz apparently. I don't have one so I wouldn't know.
Twenty hours? Corridor shooter? Yawn. [editline]12th May 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Marzipas;44792277]can you even notice over 60fps? 60 is smooth enough as it is.[/QUOTE] The human eye can only perceive 30 frames per second anyway!
[QUOTE=Marzipas;44792277]can you even notice over 60fps? 60 is smooth enough as it is.[/QUOTE] Not this argument again... You can notice the difference i use a 120 hz monitor, i a can even see the difference between 120 and 144hz, even if you dont get 120 fps. 60 fps on a 120hz monitor is still smoother than on a 60hz one.
I'm curious about the Doom beta instead. I mean, motherfucking Doom. I need to see some of that.
[QUOTE=TestECull;44791746]And six hours if you play it like a normal player would. So basically a normal FPS campaign. AKA "We couldn't make this game fun enough to play twice on a basis of fun so we've given you an arbitrary alternate ending bait to get you going through it again. This much I do agree with, though. As someone who plays primarily single player games it's frustrating as hell when I pick up a new game and see all the corners they cut to put in the multiplayer bullshit. It might be good, it might not be. But it definitely isn't worth sixty of my US Dollars. Or even thirty. Fifteen is stretching it. I'll have to pass on this one, though I can admire a dev that realizes the effects trying to develop MP and SP in the same cycle has on both modes.[/QUOTE] One day in the grim darkness of the future, you will make a post that uses actual common sense. One day.
[QUOTE=seano12;44792311]Twenty hours? Corridor shooter? Yawn.[/QUOTE] But it isn't a corridor shooter. [editline]12th May 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Rocâ„¢;44792384]I'm curious about the Doom beta instead. I mean, motherfucking Doom. I need to see some of that.[/QUOTE] Hopefully during Quake Con in July, or maybe E3
[QUOTE=Propane Addict;44789359]$60 for a 20 hour game? No thank you. I will gladly wait for a steam sale on that. [editline]12th May 2014[/editline] Which is actually really disappointing because I was strongly considering buying this game at sticker price because it looks so good.[/QUOTE] :suicide:
FPS games just aren't made like they are used to. It's rare you find something solid like Killing Floor, or something with a good story + campaign like Halo: Combat Evolved. But this looks pretty good.
[QUOTE=RichyZ;44792380]can you post a good opinion? hell, even rusty likes things once and awhile[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=RenegadeCop;44792409]he's a gimmick, ignore him[/QUOTE] You can't take a joke can you? I've been hearing "The human eye can only perceive 30 frames per second" since 2002.
[QUOTE=seano12;44792688]You can't take a joke can you? I've been hearing "The human eye can only perceive 30 frames per second" since 2002.[/QUOTE] That wasn't what he was responding to
[QUOTE=Kljunas;44791504]RTCW had a multiplayer mode of its own before W:ET was released though, didn't it?[/QUOTE] i dont remember it being online
Wouldn't "All Platforms" include Wii U? For fuck's sake, people bitch about how there aren't any games on this and yet nobody makes games for it. I just wanna shoot Nazis without having to deal with my crap pc.
[QUOTE=ChrisR;44793062]Wouldn't "All Platforms" include Wii U? For fuck's sake, people bitch about how there aren't any games on this and yet nobody makes games for it. I just wanna shoot Nazis without having to deal with my crap pc.[/QUOTE] Nobody makes games for it because nobody wants to port it because nobody buys a Wii U because nobody makes games for it. It's a sad cycle.
[QUOTE=Marzipas;44792277]can you even notice over 60fps? 60 is smooth enough as it is.[/QUOTE] Yes, but it won't be visually different if your monitor is only 60 Hz. It'll still have less input lag though.
Can't wait for this. Especially glad that it's single player only, means they obviously put a good emphasis on it and I can't exactly play multiplayer games smoothly on my 1mbps connection. First game I'd get on my PS4 in six months or so - after I got Black Flag in November.
[QUOTE=Rika-chan;44789797][url]http://www.cdkeys.com/pc/games/wolfenstein-the-new-order-pc-cd-key-steam[/url] $39.58[/QUOTE] but but but but I should be entitled to 20 for 20 hours this is unacceptable!!!!!!! developers should conform to [I]my[/I] needs not the other way around!
[QUOTE=ChrisR;44793062]Wouldn't "All Platforms" include Wii U? For fuck's sake, people bitch about how there aren't any games on this and yet nobody makes games for it. I just wanna shoot Nazis without having to deal with my crap pc.[/QUOTE] Nobody's even heard of the Wii U here. There was zero advertising of any kind, the only place you'll see ads for them is in their tiny ass sections at EB games. Ask my co-workers about it; 'a Wii U? What's that?' Ask my friends about it, 'what the hell are you on about'.
[QUOTE=markg06;44789646]Anyone else remember when people measured a game by how fun it was and not by its framerate.[/QUOTE]Well look at how much technology and hardware have improved over the years. Is it wrong of us to demand the best possible performance that our hardware is capable of? I mean yes, gameplay will be the factor that sells your game like it or not. But just because a game is fun, doesn't mean it has an excuse to run like ass. All games should strive for Max Payne 3 levels of smooth performance.
[QUOTE=Solo Wing;44793266]Well look at how much technology and hardware have improved over the years. Is it wrong of us to demand the best possible performance that our hardware is capable of? I mean yes, gameplay will be the factor that sells your game like it or not. But just because a game is fun, doesn't mean it has an excuse to run like ass. All games should strive for Max Payne 3 levels of smooth performance.[/QUOTE] pretty much this games should just be well optimized, they [I]just[/I] should have all features promised. It isn't even a matter of entitlement or anything, or that anyone deserves it. Of course, it can't happen all the time and it's not totally bad if it doesn't go the way everyone wants it, nobody of perfect, not even groups of people. Having MP3 tier optimization every time is literally impossible. You can expect a badly optimized game from a new studio and that's forgivable, but but there always a certain point of bad optimization where it's unacceptable.
[QUOTE=Antdawg;44793233]Nobody's even heard of the Wii U here. There was zero advertising of any kind, the only place you'll see ads for them is in their tiny ass sections at EB games. Ask my co-workers about it; 'a Wii U? What's that?' Ask my friends about it, 'what the hell are you on about'.[/QUOTE] Two of my friends own a Wii U. Neither use it.
[QUOTE=J!NX;44793329]pretty much this games should just be well optimized, they [I]just[/I] should have all features promised. It isn't even a matter of entitlement or anything, or that anyone deserves it. Of course, it can't happen all the time and it's not totally bad if it doesn't go the way everyone wants it, nobody of perfect, not even groups of people. Having MP3 tier optimization every time is literally impossible. You can expect a badly optimized game from a new studio and that's forgivable, but but there always a certain point of bad optimization where it's unacceptable.[/QUOTE]With the hardware at our fingertips these days, the sky is literally the limit. A man can dream can't he?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.