• Bus driver uppercuts young woman
    320 replies, posted
[QUOTE=zakedodead;38013416]Well then what category does holding the opinion that in any situation that a woman doesn't get her way is the wrong situation put you in?[/QUOTE] that's called a straw feminist [img]http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8b9h8UPyU1qzb29vo1_500.png[/img]
[QUOTE=thisispain;38013505]that's called a straw feminist [img]http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8b9h8UPyU1qzb29vo1_500.png[/img][/QUOTE] Do you read sanius's posts at all? I'm not antifeminist but he's fucking insane.
I don't think any actual feminists would like to be associated with Sanius.
Anybody got the video?
[QUOTE=zakedodead;38013541]Do you read sanius's posts at all? I'm not antifeminist but he's fucking insane.[/QUOTE] have you ever actually had a conversation with doriol??? i'm pretty sure you don't know anything about him dude he's insane but not because of his views about women lmao [editline]12th October 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Carne;38013562]I don't think any actual feminists would like to be associated with Sanius.[/QUOTE] well uh feminists aren't a hivemind so they can't collectively make decisions about who to associate with
[QUOTE=thisispain;38013636] well uh feminists aren't a hivemind so they can't collectively make decisions about who to associate with[/QUOTE] he said 'don't think any feminists would like to be associated with Sanius' as in 'I dont' think any feminist would individually want to be associated with Sanius' he didn't say 'the entire feminist movement would not want to be associated with Sanius'
[QUOTE=Maloof?;38013695]he said 'don't think any feminists would like to be associated with Sanius'[/QUOTE] no that's not what he said [quote]I don't think any [b]actual[/b] feminists would like to be associated with Sanius. [/quote]
I feel like the only consistent Facepunch poster Jesus Christ.
[QUOTE=Zally13;38014513]I feel like the only consistent Facepunch poster Jesus Christ.[/QUOTE] That's because when your opinions change it isn't a surprise to you because you were privy to the thought process.
she hit him first. Perfectly justified.
[QUOTE=thisispain;38013636] he's insane but not because of his views about women lmao [/QUOTE] I can attest to this I am insane [editline]12th October 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Mattk50;38014705]she hit him first. Perfectly justified.[/QUOTE] a push is not a hit. getting out of your chair and uppercutting somebody after they start to back off after pushing you is not self-defense
[QUOTE=trotskygrad;38011331]monkey analogy could easily have gone wrong don't fuck around when mentioning monkeys with black people[/QUOTE] why is that because i think monkeys are badass [img]http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01250/gorillas_1250411i.jpg[/img] just look at those glutes
[QUOTE=Dori;38014884] a push is not a hit. getting out of your chair and uppercutting somebody after they start to back off after pushing you is not self-defense[/QUOTE] It may have been a push, but a push while the man was driving, something really unsafe and stupid to do.
[QUOTE=Dori;38014884]I can attest to this I am insane [editline]12th October 2012[/editline] a push is not a hit. getting out of your chair and uppercutting somebody after they start to back off after pushing you is not self-defense[/QUOTE] Wasn't he driving the bus at the time? I'm sorry but If I'm a bus driver and someones yelling in my ear and then pushes me while I'm driving they're getting a punch in the face. Potentially he could have swerved and killed several people (including himself) because of her actions.
[QUOTE=Dori;38014884]I can attest to this I am insane [editline]12th October 2012[/editline] a push is not a hit. getting out of your chair and uppercutting somebody after they start to back off after pushing you is not self-defense[/QUOTE] Even a push is considered to legally be assault, and if you are assaulted, you may use force to stop the assault. What the bus driver did was respond to an assault by eliminating the threat of further assault, it will be up to a court to decide if he was legally justified in his use of force, or if it will be considered to be excessive force.
[QUOTE=barttool;38015400]something really unsafe and stupid to do.[/QUOTE] you mean like getting out of the seat to uppercut somebody?
[QUOTE=Dori;38015465]you mean like getting out of the seat to uppercut somebody?[/QUOTE] Hmm let's see which action is more idiotic. A. Pushing a bus driver while he is driving the bus, he could potentially kill and severly injure pedestrians, other drivers and everyone in the bus. B. Punching someone in the face after they just pushed you while you were driving a bus, you realise that their actions could have lead to you killing multiple people including yourself so you're pretty angry.
[QUOTE=Hobo4President;38015509]Hmm let's see which action is more idiotic. A. Pushing a bus driver while he is driving the bus, he could potentially kill and severly injure pedestrians, other drivers and everyone in the bus. B. Punching someone in the face after they just pushed you while you were driving a bus, you realise that their actions could have lead to you killing multiple people including yourself so you're pretty angry.[/QUOTE] aaand of course you've stopped the bus beforehand.
[QUOTE=Dori;38015465]you mean like getting out of the seat to uppercut somebody?[/QUOTE] I'm quite certain he pulled over and stopped the bus before getting out of his seat.
[QUOTE=Dori;38015465]you mean like getting out of the seat to uppercut somebody?[/QUOTE] A push with intent to harm is assault buddy. If you're assaulted, you have the right to defend yourself. If a girl pushes you and acts in a violent, threatening manner, that is a form of assault. It's the same as if a man does it. This is not my OPINION. This is a legal matter. His reaction was an over reaction. But it was still within his rights as he had been assaulted that moment before. You may think it's not assault, but it's fucking assault.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;38016462]A push with intent to harm is assault buddy. If you're assaulted, you have the right to defend yourself. If a girl pushes you and acts in a violent, threatening manner, that is a form of assault. It's the same as if a man does it. This is not my OPINION. This is a legal matter. His reaction was an over reaction. But it was still within his rights as he had been assaulted that moment before. You may think it's not assault, but it's fucking assault.[/QUOTE] I think most people can measure their actions to be appropriate to what they were victim to. If someone pointed threateningly (which is loosely considered assault) I wouldn't piledrive their head into the ground.
[QUOTE=Barbarian887;38015251]why is that because i think monkeys are badass <image> just look at those glutes[/QUOTE] Gorillas are closer related to apes.
[QUOTE=zakedodead;38009765]I'm pretty sure he did pretty much say hitting girls is wrong because they're girls[/QUOTE] if you've literally no understanding of context and using social attitudes to determine someone's possible biases against another sex then yeah it might seem that way to anyone remotely in touch with reality that realizes there are plenty of people out there who are thrilled just to see a woman get hit because she's a woman, it's pretty obvious why the "are they misandrists" thing would be no. its virtually impossible to find someone that is happy about escalated assault on a minor just because they're male. the chances of finding someone happy about it because they're female? fairly likely. source? this thread
[QUOTE=Kopimi;38016961]if you've literally no understanding of context and using social attitudes to determine someone's possible biases against another sex then yeah it might seem that way to anyone remotely in touch with reality that realizes there are plenty of people out there who are thrilled just to see a woman get hit because she's a woman, it's pretty obvious why the "are they misandrists" thing would be no. its virtually impossible to find someone that is happy about escalated assault on a minor just because they're male. the chances of finding someone happy about it because they're female? fairly likely. source? this thread[/QUOTE] What are you even talking about? Most people in this thread already said that they would feel the same way if it was a male who pushed the bus driver. The only reason people even brought up equality in the first place was because of the people in the video yelling "THAT'S A FEMALE!!!".
[QUOTE=Kopimi;38016961]if you've literally no understanding of context and using social attitudes to determine someone's possible biases against another sex then yeah it might seem that way to anyone remotely in touch with reality that realizes there are plenty of people out there who are thrilled just to see a woman get hit because she's a woman, it's pretty obvious why the "are they misandrists" thing would be no. its virtually impossible to find someone that is happy about escalated assault on a minor just because they're male. the chances of finding someone happy about it because they're female? fairly likely. source? this thread[/QUOTE] I couldn't give less of a fuck what gender anyone is if they attack me, they go down, is that not true equality? Or do you want women to have a get out of an asswhoopin' free card just because they're women? And before you go and get your panties in a bunch and quote several posts, ever thought that things like "bitch" etc have become gender neutral nowadays? I've seen it used against both genders for a good ten years now.
[QUOTE=Crimor;38017122]I couldn't give less of a fuck what gender anyone is if they attack me, they go down, is that not true equality? Or do you want women to have a get out of an asswhoopin' free card just because they're women?[/QUOTE] k these questions are phrased terribly there's no such thing as an "asswhoopin' card", male or female you shouldn't be "asswhoopin'" anyone ideally true equality would mean everyone treats each other with respect, dignity, and other flower power shit [quote]I've seen it used against both genders for a good ten years now.[/quote] that's not even what gender neutral means.
Wasn't the bus drivers fault. Bitch got what she deserved
[QUOTE=Kopimi;38016961]if you've literally no understanding of context and using social attitudes to determine someone's possible biases against another sex then yeah it might seem that way to anyone remotely in touch with reality that realizes there are plenty of people out there who are thrilled just to see a woman get hit because she's a woman, it's pretty obvious why the "are they misandrists" thing would be no. its virtually impossible to find someone that is happy about escalated assault on a minor just because they're male. the chances of finding someone happy about it because they're female? fairly likely. source? this thread[/QUOTE] It's lovely how the sanius squad frames this to make it look like something its not I got excited when I saw the punch for the same reason I got excited when that old man beat the shit out of the guy who assaulted him in the "I am a motherfucker" video: a loud and obnoxious person got punched in the face. I really couldn't give a shit what equipment he/she carries downstairs.
[QUOTE=JaegerMonster;38017290]I got excited when I saw the punch for the same reason I got excited when that old man beat the shit out of the guy who assaulted him in the "I am a motherfucker" video: a loud and obnoxious person got punched in the face.[/quote] hmm [quote]Sadism is the derivation of pleasure as a result of inflicting pain, cruelty, degradation, or humiliation, or, watching such behaviors inflicted on others.[/quote]
[QUOTE=thisispain;38017341]hmm[quote]Sadism is the derivation of pleasure as a result of inflicting pain, cruelty, degradation, or humiliation, or, watching such behaviors inflicted on others.[/quote][/QUOTE] no
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.