[QUOTE=Zovox;39874518]Can't we just nuke the shit out of Pyongyang so the people will be liberated? Many innocents will die but alot more will be liberated.[/QUOTE]
yeah guys let's launch weapons of mass destruction at the most populated city in north korea!! who's with me??
guys?
...guys?
I hate how uneasy this makes me. On one hand nk is known to troll around, on the other hand they havnt gone this far in such a short period of time before.
[QUOTE=Martele;39874532]yeah guys let's launch weapons of mass destruction at the most populated city in north korea!! who's with me??
guys?
...guys?[/QUOTE]
What do you suggest we do with a country that threats the entire planet with nuclear war, that holds its entire population within a wall-less prison, forcing them to like and respect their leader and to live in agony for their entire lives?
One single bomb, that won't have to be very lethal, could take out the government long enough for U.S and SK troops to move in and finish the work, take over the control of the country, liberate the people and shut down all those prison camps.
An alternative is to take out their entire communication system with an EMP-nuke, which could prevent them from launching any attacks back on any other countries.
[QUOTE=Zovox;39874576][B]One single bomb[/B], that won't have to be very lethal, could take out the government long enough for U.S and SK troops to move in and finish the work, take over the control of the country, liberate the people and shut down all those prison camps.
An alternative is to take out their entire communication system with an [B]EMP-nuke[/B], which could prevent them from launching any attacks back on any other countries.[/QUOTE]
Are you 12? :suicide:
[QUOTE=Zovox;39874576]What do you suggest we do with a country that threats the entire planet with nuclear war, that holds its entire population within a wall-less prison, forcing them to like and respect their leader and to live in agony for their entire lives?
One single bomb, that won't have to be very lethal, could take out the government long enough for U.S and SK troops to move in and finish the work, take over the control of the country, liberate the people and shut down all those prison camps.
An alternative is to take out their entire communication system with an EMP-nuke, which could prevent them from launching any attacks back on any other countries.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=armchair%20general[/url]
[QUOTE=Zovox;39874576]What do you suggest we do with a country that threats the entire planet with nuclear war, that holds its entire population within a wall-less prison, forcing them to like and respect their leader and to live in agony for their entire lives?
One single bomb, that won't have to be very lethal, could take out the government long enough for U.S and SK troops to move in and finish the work, take over the control of the country, liberate the people and shut down all those prison camps.
An alternative is to take out their entire communication system with an EMP-nuke, which could prevent them from launching any attacks back on any other countries.[/QUOTE]
I've never seen a post more appropriate for this image
[img]http://i451.photobucket.com/albums/qq238/user0_cool/hey_uh_nevermind.jpg[/img]
It's really the only reply I could fathom
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Dumb reaction image reply." - postal))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Zovox;39874576]What do you suggest we do with a country that threats the entire planet with nuclear war, that holds its entire population within a wall-less prison, forcing them to like and respect their leader and to live in agony for their entire lives?
One single bomb, that won't have to be very lethal, could take out the government long enough for U.S and SK troops to move in and finish the work, take over the control of the country, liberate the people and shut down all those prison camps.
An alternative is to take out their entire communication system with an EMP-nuke, which could prevent them from launching any attacks back on any other countries.[/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;aWtb11MorpQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWtb11MorpQ[/video]
:v:
All right, I'm a shithead, I get it.
Still, if a war breaks out, their gonna get their shit nuked, and more NK citizen will probably die that way anyway.
[QUOTE=Zovox;39874673]All right, I'm a shithead, I get it.
Still, if a war breaks out, their gonna get their shit nuked anyway, and more NK citizen will probably die that way anyway.[/QUOTE]
Nk won't get nuked, why does everyone assume this.
I seriously doubt anyone wants to nuke North Korea.
That's pretty fucked up, especially on all those civilians who shouldn't be drawn into something larger than they even know of.
If something [B][I]does[/I][/B] go down then you're likely to see surgical strikes on political and military targets with the least collateral damage possible.
This would render the military next to useless, destroy the chain of command and ruin any morale the soldiers have once they start engaging with the military technology and hardware of South Korea/US/UN
Not only would it kill loads of civilians, the fallout would affect our good friends south of the border.
Nobody in the us gov will the button that will kill millions of innocent nk citizens
I'm convinced America is too soft to use Nuclear weapons even if they're justified and necessary, honestly. They sure as hell aren't going to drop one on the Korean Peninsula. The real men who have balls are in the military, and the one's who control the Nukes sit behind desks
The only time a nuclear weapon is ever likely to be used again is in another state of total conflict, to deal a blow bigger than the opponent can take or recover from.
The other likely scenario is a dirty bomb acquired by an extremist group.
[QUOTE=Brandy92;39874725]The only time a nuclear weapon is ever likely to be used again is in another state of total conflict, to deal a blow bigger than the opponent can take or recover from.[/QUOTE]
This is probably the case, but it's not going to be from a first world country, I bet. It'll be someone along the lines of Iran, Israel, Maybe even North Korea, or if some terrorist cell got their hands on one
I doubt this is Kim Jong Un at work, its most likely the head of the workers party and military that have been planning this for a very long time and had to wait for Kim Jong il to die (maybe he shared common thoughts but knew it'd be a bad idea)
I'm not sure I quite understand non-aggression pacts. If two countries aren't going to attack one another anyway then they won't need one, if they are going to attack then they'll simply dishonor it.
[QUOTE=Zovox;39874576]EMP-nuke[/QUOTE]
You do realize call of duty is a game right
[QUOTE=fruxodaily;39874732]I doubt this is Kim Jong Un at work, its most likely the head of the workers party and military that have been planning this for a very long time and had to wait for Kim Jong il to die (maybe he shared common thoughts but knew it'd be a bad idea)[/QUOTE]
Being that there is literally no transparency in the regime it could be quite possible there is a power struggle playing out behind the scenes.
It's almost too hard to believe that a young Kim Jong-Un wrestled control of the generals and political elite.
[editline]11th March 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;39874739]I'm not sure I quite understand non-aggression pacts. If two countries aren't going to attack one another anyway then they won't need one, if they are going to attack then they'll simply dishonor it.[/QUOTE]
Fancy legal document to deem one or another as the 'bad guy'.
[QUOTE=Zovox;39874576]What do you suggest we do with a country that threats the entire planet with nuclear war, that holds its entire population within a wall-less prison, forcing them to like and respect their leader and to live in agony for their entire lives?
One single bomb, that won't have to be very lethal, could take out the government long enough for U.S and SK troops to move in and finish the work, take over the control of the country, liberate the people and shut down all those prison camps.
An alternative is to take out their entire communication system with an EMP-nuke, which could prevent them from launching any attacks back on any other countries.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Zovox;39874673]All right, I'm a shithead, I get it.
Still, if a war breaks out, their gonna get their shit nuked, and more NK citizen will probably die that way anyway.[/QUOTE]
are you autistic
Edit:
[QUOTE=Brandy92;39874742]Being that there is literally no transparency in the regime it could be quite possible there is a power struggle playing out behind the scenes.
It's almost too hard to believe that a young Kim Jong-Un wrestled control of the generals and political elite.
[/QUOTE]
I was actually thinking about this the other day, and how likely it was that Kim Jong Un might not actually be in charge.
okay I am getting abit worried now
[QUOTE=Cowabanga;39874740]You do realize call of duty is a game right[/QUOTE]
An EMP blast to take out all the electricity in Pyongyang is impossible? NK doesn't use very much electricity after all.
Of couse I didn't mean an EMP that would take out the entire planet, I'm not that stupid.
[QUOTE=Zovox;39874785]An EMP blast to take out all the electricity in Pyongyang is impossible? NK doesn't use very much electricity after all.
Of couse I didn't mean an EMP that would take out the entire planet, I'm not that stupid.[/QUOTE]
Even if this were remotely feasible you do realise that being a city with unreliable electricity there would be fuel generators everywhere. At least where the military and elite are concerned.
Everyone really should stop ignoring the fact that we had massive border skirmishes with North Korea in the late 60's, and that never boiled over into a complete invasion across the DMZ.
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_DMZ_Conflict_(1966%E2%80%931969)]Korean DMZ Conflict 66' - 69'[/url]
A war???
[QUOTE=Zovox;39874785]An EMP blast to take out all the electricity in Pyongyang is impossible? NK doesn't use very much electricity after all.
Of couse I didn't mean an EMP that would take out the entire planet, I'm not that stupid.[/QUOTE]
It'd be a lot easier to just hit whatever visible infrastructure they have with laser-guided bombs
[QUOTE=Zovox;39874576]What do you suggest we do with a country that threats the entire planet with nuclear war, that holds its entire population within a wall-less prison, forcing them to like and respect their leader and to live in agony for their entire lives?
One single bomb, that won't have to be very lethal, could take out the government long enough for U.S and SK troops to move in and finish the work, take over the control of the country, liberate the people and shut down all those prison camps.
An alternative is to take out their entire communication system with an EMP-nuke, which could prevent them from launching any attacks back on any other countries.[/QUOTE]
An EMP strike is not easily controllable, and any explosion would affect countries around them like China, SK and Japan.
This is a pretty interesting video from the 50's
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1958-02-06_Atomic_Weapons_come_to_Korea.ogv[/url]
I say we resurrect [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Rogers"]Mr. Rogers[/URL] and drop him into the NK capital to have a long chat with Kim Jong-Un and end this whole conflict peacefully
[QUOTE=Cowabanga;39874740]You do realize call of duty is a game right[/QUOTE]
You do realize that an Electromagnetic Pulse does take place after the explosion of certain nuclear bombs, right?
Although, there isn't something like a EMP-bomb per say, as far as I know.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
