Video of kid accidentally shooting self will be shown at trial. - Polidicks

Who the fuck gives an 8 year old an Uzi, let alone one that is capable of fully-automatic fire?

Has the video been posted? From the sounds of it, it is the fault of the parent(s) for giving him the weapon before teaching him gun safety. If I see the video and it's a MAC-10/11 I'm gonna silent firearmnerdrage.

[QUOTE=CoilingTesla;27319764]Has the video been posted? From the sounds of it, it is the fault of the parent(s) for giving him the weapon before teaching him gun safety. If I see the video and it's a MAC-10/11 I'm gonna silent firearmnerdrage.[/QUOTE] It's a micro uzi. And, no, I searched youtube and it's not on there. Found a video of a funny 911 call and this: [media] [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXwb18hVkYE[/url] [/media]

Then I'm gonna realize that a kid died and all I can think about is what they called the gun. Broke my automerge, you bastard.

[QUOTE=CoilingTesla;27320188]Then I'm gonna realize that a kid died and all I can think about is what they called the gun. Broke my automerge, you bastard.[/QUOTE] What I can't get over is that ABC news covered a kid getting hacked on runescape.

[QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;27310443][url]http://gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/5.1/gun-facts-5.1-screen.pdf[/url] This has to be one of the most helpful guide I've read. It gives myths against firearms, and then gives a list of facts to why that myth is wrong. You should probably read it, DogGunn.[/QUOTE] It's well cited, too. [img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3803707/dg.png[/img] So does that mean you're just not going to read it then? You really should. It's very informative. There are a lot of facts I didn't know.

It's hard for some people to read things that are against their ideologies. It's too bad really. I mean seriously, guns are about as dangerous as cars and aircraft. Would you want those banned aswell? Oh, those are the three of the top five things I enjoy the most.

[QUOTE=DogGunn;27235705]Nah. Look what a disaster the gun culture in the US is.[/QUOTE] nice perspective from someone who doesn't live there hey i hear adolf hitler is all the rage in bavaria right now

[QUOTE=Snuffy;27320542]It's well cited, too. [img_thumb]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3803707/dg.png[/img_thumb] So does that mean you're just not going to read it then? You really should. It's very informative. There are a lot of facts I didn't know.[/QUOTE] wow this is a lot of stuff

[QUOTE=hurts;27319576]Who the fuck gives an 8 year old an Uzi, let alone one that is capable of fully-automatic fire?[/QUOTE] aren't you a knight in shining armor

[QUOTE=Idi Amin;27320611]nice perspective from someone who doesn't live there[/QUOTE] Odd, I thought I said I had.

[QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;27310443][url]http://gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/5.1/gun-facts-5.1-screen.pdf[/url] This has to be one of the most helpful guide I've read. It gives myths against firearms, and then gives a list of facts to why that myth is wrong. You should probably read it, DogGunn.[/QUOTE] Wow that is an awesome document. Thank you. :D

[QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;27310443][url]http://gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/5.1/gun-facts-5.1-screen.pdf[/url] This has to be one of the most helpful guide I've read. It gives myths against firearms, and then gives a list of facts to why that myth is wrong. You should probably read it, DogGunn.[/QUOTE] I like this line: [quote]Ours is a Bill of Rights, not a Bill of Needs.[/quote]

[IMG]http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/3297/amerifag.png[/img] Hello, I don't think guns should be restricted, because violent crimes don't suddenly disappear if you do so. The fact that massacres constantly occur in countries with a liberal gun policy is a mere coincidence. However, I do NOT like when anyone even suggests that maybe restricting guns is a rational decision to prevent homicides and accidents due to the lethality of firearms, because it's taking away our FREEDOM. Everyone that wants to restrict MY freedom is a socialist, communist, fascist, nazist, and everything else that is anti-American. However, I do not mind the State (I mean government, this is America, lol) protecting me from terrorists in a way that takes away some of my freedom. Even though that contradicts my past sentence I don't particularily care because I'm a hypocritic faggot and I LOVE America. God bless America. Land of the free, home of the brave.

^^^ hahaha

[QUOTE=Idi Amin;27320731]aren't you a knight in shining armor[/QUOTE] it's a perfectly legitimate question

[QUOTE=Lazor;27321659]it's a perfectly legitimate question[/QUOTE] We have some stupid people up here in MA, and with all the gun violence in Springfield, I'm sure they wanted to get him trained early.

I feel bad for the Jury. One day you get a letter saying you've been selected for jury duty, the next day you're forced to watch this video.

[QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;27310443][url]http://gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/5.1/gun-facts-5.1-screen.pdf[/url] This has to be one of the most helpful guide I've read. It gives myths against firearms, and then gives a list of facts to why that myth is wrong. You should probably read it, DogGunn.[/QUOTE]Fairly decent in that it sources each statement, but that guy seriously needs a history lesson. "In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. Then, from 1929 to 1953, approximately 20-millon dissidents were rounded up and killed." Hmm, there was this little thing called the Second World War in the middle of that which I think you'll find accounts for a vast majority of those deaths.

[QUOTE=Sgt Doom;27322360]Fairly decent in that it sources each statement, but that guy seriously needs a history lesson. "In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. Then, from 1929 to 1953, approximately 20-millon dissidents were rounded up and killed." Hmm, there was this little thing called the Second World War in the middle of that which I think you'll find accounts for a vast majority of those deaths.[/QUOTE] Actually it may not. Stalin killed a LOT of people. Even if we ignore the millions of deaths by famine, we have records for something like 3-4 million people being killed outright with millions more probably not recorded and millions more beyond that indirectly killed. All on top of the millions killed in WWII. From what I understand, the Soviets liked to use prisoners as shock troops, which could technically account for quite a few more deaths.

[quote]Judge Peter C. Velis decided Tuesday that video taken at the show will be allowed to be shown to jurors up to the point when Bizilj accidentally shot himself in the head with an Uzi submachine gun. He ruled that jurors would only be allowed to hear certain pieces of audio following the shooting. There is no video following the shooting, as the camera was dropped.[/quote]How the fuck are they meant to make any valid call on this when it's practically getting censored from them?

[QUOTE=GunFox;27322673]Actually it may not. Stalin killed a LOT of people. Even if we ignore the millions of deaths by famine, we have records for something like 3-4 million people being killed outright with millions more probably not recorded and millions more beyond that indirectly killed. All on top of the millions killed in WWII. From what I understand, the Soviets liked to use prisoners as shock troops, which could technically account for quite a few more deaths.[/QUOTE]The vast majority of the people that Stalin killed were from the famine in the Soviet Union, and that was from the collectivization policy rather than rounding up people and shooting them. The actual Great Purge killed, at most, 3/4 of a million. The rest were WW2 deaths. To say gun ownership could have stopped those 20 million deaths is a gross misrepresentation.

[QUOTE=Bomimo;27322870]How the fuck are they meant to make any valid call on this when it's practically getting censored from them?[/QUOTE] Why do the jurors need to see the fatal shots, and the back of his skull fly off? The poor kid is clearly dead at that point. And I'm sure the court wouldn't cut any relevant audio, like instructions to yelled to the kid etc

good job america

[QUOTE=zeebiedeebie;27321944]I feel bad for the Jury. One day you get a letter saying you've been selected for jury duty, the next day you're forced to watch this video.[/QUOTE] It's up until he gets shot. No blood and gore. [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=DogGunn;27322918]Why do the jurors need to see the fatal shots, and the back of his skull fly off? The poor kid is clearly dead at that point. And I'm sure the court wouldn't cut any relevant audio, like instructions to yelled to the kid etc[/QUOTE] Actually, there's no audio.

[QUOTE=supersnail11;27322985]Actually, there's no audio.[/QUOTE] [quote]He ruled that jurors would only be allowed to hear certain pieces of audio following the shooting.[/quote] Where did you read there was no audio? It makes no mention before the shooting, but it mentions it after. I can assume then that it is unedited before, and relevant parts heard after.

[QUOTE=Leo Leonardo;27310443][url]http://gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/5.1/gun-facts-5.1-screen.pdf[/url] This has to be one of the most helpful guide I've read. It gives myths against firearms, and then gives a list of facts to why that myth is wrong. You should probably read it, DogGunn.[/QUOTE] there's a lot of bias in that

[QUOTE=Greaterbeing;27324972]there's a lot of bias in that[/QUOTE] It's well-cited bias.

[QUOTE=Greaterbeing;27324972]there's a lot of bias in that[/QUOTE] Cited facts are bias? Such as?

[QUOTE=DogGunn;27324139]Where did you read there was no audio? It makes no mention before the shooting, but it mentions it after. I can assume then that it is unedited before, and relevant parts heard after.[/QUOTE] I heard it on the news when I posted this. Pro Tip: When you're sick, don't watch local news.