Lifelogger wearable camera streams your life in real-time, 720p HD - Polidicks

[QUOTE=ejonkou;44824130]The company who is making this product is a US based company, so any other country is rather irrelevant in this discussion.[/QUOTE] Because goods and people never ever leave the country they were manufactured/born in, right.

[QUOTE=mobrockers;44824160]Because goods and people never ever leave the country they were manufactured/born in, right.[/QUOTE] No. Since every country has it's own set of laws, regarding what you can and can not photograph/film. Saying "It's Illegal in Germany" in a discussion like this is dumb. We all have to find a middle ground, a point of view to see this matter from. The United States is the only logical option. The company who is creating this product is based out of the US. I'm also guessing that the large majority of people who will be using this product lives in the US. When discussing something like this, basing our arguments from our local law doesn't really work.

[QUOTE=ejonkou;44824506]No. Since every country has it's own set of laws, regarding what you can and can not photograph/film. Saying "It's Illegal in Germany" in a discussion like this is dumb. We all have to find a middle ground, a point of view to see this matter from. The United States is the only logical option. The company who is creating this product is based out of the US. I'm also guessing that the large majority of people who will be using this product lives in the US. When discussing something like this, basing our arguments from our local law doesn't really work.[/QUOTE] They ship it overseas, therefore taking your local law into account is also needed.

[QUOTE=ejonkou;44823807]It's not illegal to film people without their consent.[/QUOTE] Surveillance Camera Man is going to have a field day with this new hardware.

[QUOTE=darth-veger;44822899]Believe me, more then enough people will get really mad when they notice you are recording something.[/QUOTE] I always thought this was silly. You're fine with people viewing you, but as soon as they record so they can view it later then it's unacceptable. As long as users aren't using this to sexually objectify strangers then what's the problem?

now I can log my fap hours in their entirety

[QUOTE=ejonkou;44823807]And I doubt anyone is going to go around filming women to masturbate to, especially in an age where you're generally a few clicks of a button away from pornography.[/QUOTE] Have you forgotten about [url=http://www.reddit.com/r/CandidFashionPolice]r/creepshots[/url]?

This is really good for personal use. the one thing that you wish you have more of when someone close to you leaves/dies are pictures and videos. Just imagine being able to watch almost every part of your parent's life, so even when they are gone, they're immortalized in these time capsules of sorts. [editline]sd[/editline] people think that the main idea of this is to record in public, I don't think anyone would really even want to do that but hey, it has way more uses than unknowingly recording random pedestrians. PLUS there are already devices that are WAAY more incogneto than this that are specifically designed to record without notice. this isn't going to do shit if creepers really want to creep.

My counter-example for wearable cameras are nude beaches. They are a public location, so you should not expect privacy in public, but would you [i]really[/i] be okay with someone filming you and others nude so they could go home and masturbate to you later?

They should make a two camera version so you can record in 3D and play it on a VR.

[QUOTE=AntonioR;44825032]They should make a two camera version so you can record in 3D and play it on a VR.[/QUOTE] Finally True 3D porn

They should make a three camera version, so I could watch it in 4D.

"Is this a rerun?" [i]Someone watching my stream[/i]

Damn, originally I thought this was about a logger who was streaming his job everyday in 720p.

Can't wait for all the videos of complete weirdos who record everything creating situations with the police and other people and then uploading the videos on youtube claiming they did nothing wrong.

What's up, everybody, it's Cr1tikal, let's do this shit

[QUOTE=Laserbeams;44825468]What's up, everybody, it's Cr1tikal, let's do this shit[/QUOTE] We could watch him play the games And then stream ourselves watching it!

[QUOTE=Ganerumo;44825426]Can't wait for all the videos of complete weirdos who record everything creating situations with the police and other people and then uploading the videos on youtube claiming they did nothing wrong.[/QUOTE] So basically the exact same as what we're getting now?

Are they going to call it p2.0?

[QUOTE=KillerJaguar;44825025]My counter-example for wearable cameras are nude beaches. They are a public location, so you should not expect privacy in public, but would you [i]really[/i] be okay with someone filming you and others nude so they could go home and masturbate to you later?[/QUOTE] honestly this is an endless hole. i could even say that isn't it your own fault that you see a person with a camera and the immediate thing you think is "wow i bet that person is going to masturbate to me"? like you're bending the other person to your will just because YOU feel uncomfortable by something they're doing that is in no way directly related to sexual activity.

snip this sounded really weird after re reading

I guess a camera like that would make recording POV videos a lot easier [i]if you know what I mean[/i].

[QUOTE=Sgt-NiallR;44823068]I know, but I'm dumbfounded as to why. Even ignoring the fact that it's harmless, public places are [I]public[/I]. That is to say, the opposite to private.[/QUOTE] reasonable expectation of privacy and stuff

[QUOTE=KillerJaguar;44825025]My counter-example for wearable cameras are nude beaches. They are a public location, so you should not expect privacy in public, but would you [i]really[/i] be okay with someone filming you and others nude so they could go home and masturbate to you later?[/QUOTE] Sure, if they wanted to. I can see why people think it's creepy but since I don't know about it then it doesn't affect me in the slightest. The fear that someone might be doing something creepy that you don't know about is no justification for limiting people's rights. [editline]18th May 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Zukriuchen;44838543]reasonable expectation of privacy and stuff[/QUOTE] It's in public, it's not an invasion of privacy. Creepshots are different because you're taking a picture of something that's not public (like up someone's skirt or whatever). This isn't an invasion of privacy.

[QUOTE=supersnail11;44838581]Sure, if they wanted to. I can see why people think it's creepy but since I don't know about it then it doesn't affect me in the slightest. The fear that someone might be doing something creepy that you don't know about is no justification for limiting people's rights.[/QUOTE] The right to record other people in public without their consent?

Now I can be a boring person at 720p

[QUOTE=KillerJaguar;44838622]The right to record other people in public without their consent?[/QUOTE] The right of free speech and expression. Preventing people from recording in public because you have an irrational fear of creepy people is limiting that right

[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;44838543]reasonable expectation of privacy and stuff[/QUOTE] I don't know about you, but I don't expect [I]privacy[/I] in a [I]public [/I]place. I expect [I]privacy [/I]in [I]private [/I]places.

[QUOTE=supersnail11;44838643]The right of free speech and expression. Preventing people from recording in public because you have an irrational fear of creepy people is limiting that right[/QUOTE] Please do explain how recording people without consent is free speech. [editline]18th May 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Sgt-NiallR;44838668]I don't know about you, but I don't expect [I]privacy[/I] in a [I]public [/I]place. I expect [I]privacy [/I]in [I]private [/I]places.[/QUOTE] So you don't mind if I put cameras in changing rooms? Because they're in a public place.

[QUOTE=KillerJaguar;44838675] So you don't mind if I put cameras in changing rooms? Because they're in a public place.[/QUOTE] Except they're not? Changing rooms in gyms and such are privately owned by the owner of the building. Even if they were public, they'd be protected from recording for the same reason men can't just stroll into the women's changing room and vice versa.