• AP uncovers that the FBI is using a bunch of faux companies to operate an air force of planes featur
    41 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Spirit_Breaker;47866017]You do realize that technology developed at Lockheed Martin and similar corporations is something that we can't imagine and is like at least 10 years ahead of our time, right? Edit: Lol at people actually thinking this is funny and not the truth.[/QUOTE] Your wild speculations =/= "truth" I mean, unless you have something to back up your claims with.
[QUOTE=Spirit_Breaker;47866017]You do realize that technology developed at Lockheed Martin and similar corporations is something that we can't imagine and is like at least 10 years ahead of our time, right? Edit: Lol at people actually thinking this is funny and not the truth.[/QUOTE] By "unimaginable technology that's 10 years ahead" do you mean a 20% reduction in radar cross section? Aircraft that fly at 12'500 meters instead of 12'200 meters? Targeting systems that lock on in 0.320 seconds instead of 0.340? Anti-air missiles that fly 3% faster? That's what ten years of technology will do, seriously.
at this point I wouldn't be surprised if the government started installing radio transmitters in dentures or something just as a joke to prove the conspiracy people right
[QUOTE=masterbateman;47864567]haha bullshit[/QUOTE] It's a light aircraft, not a "spy plane", you're never going to fit the electronics needed for storing or transmitting large amounts of data into it and still have it take off, the only thing these would be useful for is monitoring a handful of people in the same area for a few hours at a time. I'm honestly surprised they're not using drones for it actually.
[QUOTE=Spirit_Breaker;47866017]You do realize that technology developed at Lockheed Martin and similar corporations is something that we can't imagine and is like at least 10 years ahead of our time, right? Edit: Lol at people actually thinking this is funny and not the truth.[/QUOTE] I knew there would be dangers to all this talk of VR and other advanced tech. I didn't know it'd make Lockheed Martin into Area 51.
[QUOTE=wickedplayer494;47863595]I much prefer /r/actualconspiracies since that's kept free from the crazies.[/QUOTE] I always wondered why you seemed crazed about smashing down 'conspiracy theorists'... You are just sipping a more refined kool aid
[QUOTE=Sally;47869808]You are just sipping a more refined kool aid[/QUOTE] That's probably the most amusing way to phrase 'informed'. Most of this conspiracy theory nonsense relies on the theorist having little to no knowledge of how the government works, or any of the technologies involved, and is easily refuted by experts, who are then branded part of the conspiracy. See: architectural engineers' reaction to 'jet fuel can't melt steel beams'. It sure is easy to posit that the FBI is using fleets of Cessnas to covertly spy on the entire American populace- provided you are blithely unaware of the watchdog groups in place, the legal limitations imposed by the FISA courts, the technical requirements that would make tiny spy planes impractical, and the fact that it would be way easier to just get the data from the telecom companies.
[QUOTE=Spirit_Breaker;47866017]You do realize that technology developed at Lockheed Martin and similar corporations is something that we can't imagine and is like at least 10 years ahead of our time, right? Edit: Lol at people actually thinking this is funny and not the truth.[/QUOTE] man, I bet the FBI [B]wishes[/B] they had half of the [I]super secret spy technology[/I] you think they have
[QUOTE=catbarf;47869963]That's probably the most amusing way to phrase 'informed'. [/QUOTE] You don't understand the phrase because its anything but informed. [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid"]here[/URL] [QUOTE=Spirit_Breaker;47866017]You do realize that technology developed at Lockheed Martin and similar corporations is something that we can't imagine and is like at least 10 years ahead of our time, right? Edit: Lol at people actually thinking this is funny and not the truth.[/QUOTE] You need to understand that if people are rating it non seriously, then forcing the truth on people is just going cause more damage than you think to that very truth. Take catbarfs 'joke' for example [quote]'jet fuel can't melt steel beams'.[/quote] people who found this out either by googling the melting point of steel or watched a documentary, had considered themselves enlighten, as its a undeniable fact. So those same people went around posting on youtube claiming 9/11 was X, and using jetfuel cannot melt steel beams as their shield. Guess what, they associated it that phrase with conspiracy theorists which is already mocked on the internet.
[QUOTE=catbarf;47869963]That's probably the most amusing way to phrase 'informed'. Most of this conspiracy theory nonsense relies on the theorist having little to no knowledge of how the government works, or any of the technologies involved, and is easily refuted by experts, who are then branded part of the conspiracy. See: architectural engineers' reaction to 'jet fuel can't melt steel beams'. It sure is easy to posit that the FBI is using fleets of Cessnas to covertly spy on the entire American populace- provided you are blithely unaware of the watchdog groups in place, the legal limitations imposed by the FISA courts, the technical requirements that would make tiny spy planes impractical, and the fact that it would be way easier to just get the data from the telecom companies.[/QUOTE] Impractical, inefficient, and expensive. For all we know they were taking surveillance photos of future raid sites
[url]http://www.news10.net/story/news/local/sacramento-central/2014/03/18/mysterious-plane-circles-sacramento/6591669/[/url] [url]http://bringmethenews.com/2015/05/30/mysterious-plane-circling-twin-cities-raises-concerns-over-surveillance/[/url] [url]http://bringmethenews.com/2015/06/03/franken-wants-answers-on-fbi-surveillance-flights-over-twin-cities/[/url] [url]http://www.startribune.com/fbi-behind-mysterious-surveillance-aircraft-over-us-cities/305793361/[/url] Then what the heck are they doing it for? They do it for times ranging from 20 minutes to hours at a time while I am on my back patio - sometimes in the middle of the day and sometimes in the dead of night. They can't possibly need that many photos of a single location. How is this flight pattern in any way representative of photography or intel-collection on specific areas, unless you define the specific area as the entire city? [url]http://www.flightradar24.com/data/airplanes/n361db/#6602ae2[/url]
fbi -flying badguys incorporated read between the lines boys
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.