• Arkansas school board member says fags should kill themselves.
    284 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Warhol;25749646]And if the guy is showing some skin, so fucking what? [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] Are your eyes going to burst on fire?[/QUOTE] He's probably insecure with his own sexuality.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25748676]Give me a logical explanation as to why they should still be alive in our society, then? They can't produce offspring, they like the same...sex; that's repulsively disgusting and biologically decadent to the futures generations of a society. What purpose do they have?[/QUOTE] Admit it, you like it up the ass.
[QUOTE=JDK721v5;25749371]why do you go to the parades if you hate gays[/QUOTE] Also an incredibly valid point.
[quote]If you arent against it, you might as well be for it.[/quote] Well yeah, that's kind of how opinions work.
[QUOTE=bravehat;25749611]ALERT THE POLICE THESE PEOPLE ARE BEING DECADENT!! So people with fetishes, they should kill themselves too right? I mean after all they're having sex for pleasure not procreation which is a big no no. So I suppose the whole species should go ahead and hang themselves right? cause I mean, there's not a single living human without a fetish to any degree right? Fuck off you useless gobshite, and realise that not everyone has to adhere to what you subjectively think is right and wrong.[/QUOTE] Homosexuality isn't a fetish. [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=I Broke The Sun!;25749151]You can't exactly take them out of the gene pool if they can't reproduce, now can you?[/QUOTE] Extermination.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25749949]Homosexuality isn't a fetish.[/QUOTE] Nobody said it was. Learn to read.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25749949]Homosexuality isn't a fetish. [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] Extermination.[/QUOTE] Why? If they can't contribute their genes(which you find undesirable for some reason, them being homosexuals), and they're productive members of society, why kill them? [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] We aren't cave men anymore, our goal as a society isn't to fuck bitches.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25749949]Homosexuality isn't a fetish. [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] Extermination.[/QUOTE] You're a fucking idiot, before you continue stop throwing around biological terms like they give your argument weight and credibility. Gays are already outside of the gene pool because they won't have fucking kids you idiot, and although homosexuality isn't a fetish, it can be seen to operate under the same basic principles. If you have to ask why or attempt to refute this all you are going to do is hammer a nine inch nail into your arguments coffin. As if it held any weight in the first place.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25748676]Give me a logical explanation as to why they should still be alive in our society, then? They can't produce offspring, they like the same...sex; that's repulsively disgusting and biologically decadent to the futures generations of a society. What purpose do they have?[/QUOTE] Life isn't about producing offspring you fuck. [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Paravin;25748656]The only real, active contact with gays for me is when they organize their horrific pride parades. And sorry if I don't want a hairy guy sticking his crotch in my face while he dances around in a skimpy skirt.[/QUOTE] You're an idiot. Straight people flaunt being straight 10x more than gays do. You just don't realize it.
[QUOTE=I Broke The Sun!;25750013]Why? If they can't contribute their genes(which you find undesirable for some reason, them being homosexuals), and they're productive members of society, why kill them? [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] We aren't cave men anymore, our goal as a society isn't to fuck bitches.[/QUOTE] We aren't cavemen anymore but for the perpetuation of society the less gays the better - biologically speaking. Gays don't contribute to more offspring, if you took 100 gay people (50/50 both female and male) and put them in an isoloated country and do the same but with straight people. Who do you think will strive biologically in terms of offspring or the perpetuation of the generation? The gay half would rot out.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25749949]Homosexuality isn't a fetish. [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] Extermination.[/QUOTE] You're right, it isn't a fetish. It's a natural biological twist.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25750368]Life isn't about producing offspring you fuck. [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] [/QUOTE] Biologically speaking it is for the collective species. Would you seriously have a bunch of gay faggots roaming around the world stalling the species- growth? Same with the severely mentally handicapped or people who have 'deformed' mindsets or chemical precursors in the brain - still unknown to scientists till this day as to why homosexuality occurs. I think not.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750419]We aren't cavemen anymore but for the perpetuation of society the less gays the better - biologically speaking. Gays don't contribute to more offspring, if you took 100 gay people (50/50 both female and male) and put them in an isoloated country and do the same but with straight people. Who do you think will strive biologically in terms of offspring or the perpetuation of the generation? The gay half would rot out.[/QUOTE] So? Life isn't about producing offspring. If that's what you WANT to do, then fine, if not, who the fuck cares? There are a lot of straight people that don't want kids. Should you kill them too? If so, proof of troll.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750445]Biologically speaking it is for the collective species. Would you seriously have a bunch of gay faggots roaming around the world stalling the species- growth?[/QUOTE] "gay faggots" stop posting
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750445]Biologically speaking it is for the collective species. Would you seriously have a bunch of gay faggots roaming around the world stalling the species- growth?[/QUOTE] Yes, I would, because our species doesn't grow through traditional evolution as much, and their lives don't affect anything else. They're existence doesn't slow or degrade the gene pool. Bigots and idiots like you DO however degrade the gene pool.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750419]We aren't cavemen anymore but for the perpetuation of society the less gays the better - biologically speaking. Gays don't contribute to more offspring, if you took 100 gay people (50/50 both female and male) and put them in an isoloated country and do the same but with straight people. Who do you think will strive biologically in terms of offspring or the perpetuation of the generation? The gay half would rot out.[/QUOTE] Wrong, IVF treatments, and the fact that there is actually a procedure now that takes the nucleic material from female bone marrow and produces sperm cells from it, so now two chicks can actually have kids together. Oh would look at that, was that... was that just a nice big sloppy scientific cock slap right across your face? Yeah, Yeah it was :colbert:
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25750482]Yes, I would, because our species doesn't grow through traditional evolution as much, and their lives don't affect anything else. They're existence doesn't slow or degrade the gene pool. Bigots and idiots like you DO however degrade the gene pool.[/QUOTE] Their existence is ultimately useless though in terms of societal biology. If they can't produce offspring then what the fuck is the point of homosexuality to begin with? If it exists it must mean something is indeed wrong with their mindset or chemical balance in the brain. And sure it's natural but it's flawed in nature, it's a deformity that needs to be expunged and dealt with swiftly. Extermination is the key to go. [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25750482]Yes, I would, because our species doesn't grow through traditional evolution as much, and their lives don't affect anything else. They're existence doesn't slow or degrade the gene pool. Bigots and idiots like you DO however degrade the gene pool.[/QUOTE] Imagine a world without gays and the mentally retarded. Biologically we'd thrive and produce more for the betterment of our species survival.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750445]Biologically speaking it is for the collective species. Would you seriously have a bunch of gay faggots roaming around the world stalling the species- growth? Same with the severely mentally handicapped or people who have 'deformed' mindsets or chemical precursors in the brain - still unknown to scientists till this day as to why homosexuality occurs. I think not.[/QUOTE] You know the ironic thing? you would be one of the people on the extermination lists.
[QUOTE=bravehat;25750540]Wrong, IVF treatments, and the fact that there is actually a procedure now that takes the nucleic material from female bone marrow and produces sperm cells from it, so now two chicks can actually have kids together. Oh would look at that, was that... was that just a nice big sloppy scientific cock slap right across your face? Yeah, Yeah it was :colbert:[/QUOTE] That's a man-made scientific factor though so that faggots can artificially bare children. They can't produce children themselves. And straight people who don't want kids I can understand for personal reasons.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750543] Imagine a world without gays and the mentally retarded. Biologically we'd thrive and produce more for the betterment of our species survival.[/QUOTE] You're right, we would. But nobody cares.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750445]Biologically speaking it is for the collective species. Would you seriously have a bunch of gay faggots roaming around the world stalling the species- growth? Same with the severely mentally handicapped or people who have 'deformed' mindsets or chemical precursors in the brain - still unknown to scientists till this day as to why homosexuality occurs. I think not.[/QUOTE] uh oh buddy-o's here he comes here comes handsome [img]http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/3583/94019232.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750618]That's a man-made scientific factor though so that faggots can artificially bare children. They can't produce children themselves. And straight people who don't want kids I can understand for personal reasons.[/QUOTE] Homosexuals can still produce children, dumbass.
You guys are being trolled so hard.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750543]Their existence is ultimately useless though in terms of societal biology. If they can't produce offspring then what the fuck is the point of homosexuality to begin with? If it exists it must mean something is indeed wrong with their mindset or chemical balance in the brain. And sure it's natural but it's flawed in nature, it's a deformity that needs to be expunged and dealt with swiftly. Extermination is the key to go. [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] Imagine a world without gays and the mentally retarded. Biologically we'd thrive and produce more for the betterment of our species survival.[/QUOTE] No. It would be no different. It would be no fucking different. Why? because of how irrelevant it is, and how stupid you are. the only people that deserve to be scrubbed from the gene pool are bigots and fuckheads like you denying basic goals of humanity and human rights for no reason at all except to fulfill your bigotry. [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Warhol;25750672]You guys are being trolled so hard.[/QUOTE] I know, i'm just too bored to do what I should be doing right now.
[QUOTE=Doriol;25750642]Homosexuals can still produce children, dumbass.[/QUOTE] Yeah if you point a gun to their heads and say 'fuck this woman'. While they inject their unaroused, flaccid penis into the woman's vagina. Exterminate them all, they're biologically decadent and useless.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750618]That's a man-made scientific factor though so that faggots can artificially bare children. They can't produce children themselves. And straight people who don't want kids I can understand for personal reasons.[/QUOTE] Yeah, science is how we evolve and adapt now, it is a technological adaptation to overcome barriers for gays and those who can't have kids of their own. Fucking face it, you're some fucking idiot guy who was sexually repressed as a kid by a hyper religious family and you're now lashing out at other people with the fucking stones to live the way they want live. Deal with it you closet fudge packer.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750714]Yeah if you point a gun to their heads and say 'fuck this woman'. While they inject their unaroused, flaccid penis into the woman's vagina. Exterminate them all, they're biologically decadent and useless.[/QUOTE] They fulfill more use than you.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750714]Yeah if you point a gun to their heads and say 'fuck this woman'. While they inject their unaroused, flaccid penis into the woman's vagina. [/QUOTE] There's no way you're not a troll. Homosexuality is not heterophobia. And it's possible to be homoromantic and heterosexual/bisexual.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25750698]No. It would be no different. It would be no fucking different. Why? because of how irrelevant it is, and how stupid you are. the only people that deserve to be scrubbed from the gene pool are bigots and fuckheads like you denying basic goals of humanity and human rights for no reason at all except to fulfill your bigotry. [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] I know, i'm just too bored to do what I should be doing right now.[/QUOTE] A bigot I may be but I am for the survival of the human species on a purely biological level, not an ethical or moral one. I don't wish to see gays perpetuate into the future of society, they're useless for breeding and evolutionary productivity with the species.
[QUOTE=Handsome;25750714]Yeah if you point a gun to their heads and say 'fuck this woman'. While they inject their unaroused, flaccid penis into the woman's vagina. Exterminate them all, they're biologically decadent and useless.[/QUOTE] I personally fucking guarantee you wouldn't be able to fuck under that pressure. You know why? Cause it's an instictive biological reaction in fight or flight situations for your body to reduce blood flow to your cock. You complete and utter fucking retard, seriously is your skull just filled with a vacuous fucking void or are there some redundant fucking synapses still firing away in throes of anger as your brain slowly burns from your unending stupidity?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.