[QUOTE=OogalaBoogal;24819657]
[B]Sarah Palin is seriously a bad mark[/B] on the republican party. I have never seen someone so [B]ignorant and generally dumb[/B].[/QUOTE]
I'd say that makes her a pretty damn blatant mark.
Wouldn't large taxes encourage them to invest their money to keep their fortunes big instead of hoarding it?
I'm sorry did I miss something or is this way of thinking incredibly backwards?!
[QUOTE=OogalaBoogal;24819657]
Sarah Palin is seriously a bad mark on the republican party. I have never seen someone so ignorant and generally dumb.[/QUOTE]
She's fucking propped up by the republicans.
[QUOTE=Metalcastr;24816402]Politicians on both sides love spending money. They won't even do anything about the deficit we're in, even though they talk about it. We are going to spend ourselves out of existence.[/QUOTE]
That's right, both sides love to spend money. Only one of them actually uses it as a policy while the other one claims that tax cuts will be the end-all of economic problems.
I'll let you figure out which one's which.
[QUOTE=BmB;24821253]Wouldn't large taxes encourage them to invest their money to keep their fortunes big instead of hoarding it?
I'm sorry did I miss something or is this way of thinking incredibly backwards?![/QUOTE]
Why would we want that? We want the rich to spend. Hell, we want everyone to spend. Spending is good for the economy no matter how you look at it.
[quote]The party's new economic basis is tax cuts for all, rather than the higher class.[/quote]
Yes this is definitely the rational thing to do given the financial situation of America right now.
[QUOTE=zombiefreak;24830749]Why would we want that? We want the rich to spend. Hell, we want everyone to spend. Spending is good for the economy no matter how you look at it.[/QUOTE]
But what about the deficit?
[QUOTE=Habsburg;24830781]But what about the deficit?[/QUOTE]
By everyone I mean the citizens.
[editline]04:24PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Athena;24830767]oh please do tell us how we're wrong[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=zombiefreak;24818265]The party's new economic basis is tax cuts for all, rather than the higher class. Socially, they are pretty much the same IE: Lenient gun laws and no gay marriage.
The party has changed since bush you know, because parties can like, change.[/QUOTE]
You're great at reading.
Lets stop taxing the rich who create walmart and mcdonalds jobs for us at minimum wage.
[QUOTE=IStanI;24830826]Lets stop taxing the rich who create walmart and mcdonalds jobs for us at minimum wage.[/QUOTE]
Would you rather be unemployed?
Economists are the only people who get paid for never having to be right.
What entitles you to their money? Do the rich require more resources than you?
[QUOTE=zombiefreak;24830841]Would you rather be unemployed?[/QUOTE]
Unemployed or fucked
hmmmmmm
hard decision
oh wait, that's the problem.
[QUOTE=Warhol;24831692]Unemployed or fucked
hmmmmmm
hard decision
oh wait, that's the problem.[/QUOTE]
And what? Raise minimum wage? All that'll do is increase unemployment because companies will want workers that are better at their job (IE California, virtually no manufacturing jobs are here). Companies aren't going to hire someone just because he's in a screwed situation, that's what companies try NOT to do.
That's complete bullshit. Management of money, not wages, is the issue with companies.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
