'We will kill you.' NATO PsyOps broadcast to Gaddafi. - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Chopstick;30708390]Why would you want to help either of these sides? The only thing you can realistically pull out of this war is an ally that might provide oil. Wars don't really bring back the treasure like they used to so it's just a big waste of money unless you get something back.[/QUOTE] You uplift a group of people who are oppressed and trying to get their freedom? That's kinda important.

[QUOTE=Zeddy;30708453]You uplift a group of people who are oppressed and trying to get their freedom? That's kinda important.[/QUOTE] I find it hilarious how people actually think the British government alone is willing to shell out £260m solely to liberate the Libyans.

The rebels have already said they won't honor any agreements about oil if they are harmful to the Libyan people or have supported Gaddafi. Here's a tip: There are probably a lot like that. And when did the British become NATO? The UK surely has a few reasons of its own, like the Lockerbie incident. Can't exactly blame them for wanting some revenge for that.

[QUOTE=Zeddy;30708559]The rebels have already said they won't honor any agreements about oil if they are harmful to the Libyan people or have supported Gaddafi. Here's a tip: There are probably a lot like that. And when did the British become NATO? The UK surely has a few reasons of its own, like the Lockerbie incident. Can't exactly blame them for wanting some revenge for that.[/QUOTE] I guess I can't say anything then until we all see how this situation plays out. I'll just watch for now.

[QUOTE=Zeddy;30708453]You uplift a group of people who are oppressed and trying to get their freedom? That's kinda important.[/QUOTE] I find it funny, you think the war is about liberating the people but you know it's really just going to be something in it for NATOil or else there'd be no reason to fight over the place at all.

[QUOTE=Chopstick;30708730]I find it funny, you think the war is about liberating the people but you know it's really just going to be something in it for NATOil or else there'd be no reason to fight over the place at all.[/QUOTE] Because NATO can just run in and steal the oil from them. Just like they did with... ohh, wait, they've never done that. So how about you stop bullshitting. Nobody gives a damn for your conspiracy theories about how NATO is just a tool for Oil Companies and shit. Majestic 12 does not control the world and secretly run all western government.

NATO troops partially defend Saudi Arabia as one of the worlds largest oil reserves in the world and happens to be allies with the Western countries. Middle east countries also in that area include Iran and Iraq which exports oil to the Western world which happened shortly after removing Saddam Hussein. NATOil is justified.

[QUOTE=Chopstick;30708884]NATO troops partially defend Saudi Arabia as one of the worlds largest oil reserves in the world and happens to be allies with the Western countries. Middle east countries also in that area include Iran and Iraq which exports oil to the Western world which happened shortly after removing Saddam Hussein. NATOil is justified.[/QUOTE] UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE nato has supported some wars in some places that happen to have oil CAN YOU EXPLAIN THAT???? just stop posting shukaidox

[QUOTE=The Epidemic;30707814]So is NATO the international police force or something?[/QUOTE] NATO is an old alliance made by the United States and number of western countries during the cold war to combat if necessary, the then growing threat of the Warsaw pact (USSR and its puppet states). The Warsaw pact is no more, and NATO is still around, so basically they now target countries that they deem either a threat to them, themselves (such as Libya) or another ally. So yes they are a bit like world police unfortunately.

[QUOTE=cccritical;30708944]UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE nato has supported some wars in some places that happen to have oil CAN YOU EXPLAIN THAT???? just stop posting shukaidox[/QUOTE] Explain why NATOil would be fighting this war other than for the needs of the rebels, I don't see any reason they wouldn't be doing it for oil.

Cool story: The UN was originally meant to be an actual official world police force, and even has a [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Staff_Committee]Military Staff Committee[/url] responsible for planning military operations against countries who fuck about. This was never put into practice because of the Cold War, and because now everyone hates the idea of a world police. The Military Staff Committee still exists, even though it hasn't met since the 1940s, and countries still have to designate representatives to it and everything.

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30706376][quote] "As you know we can strike at any time and place of your choosing if you continue to endanger our people."[/quote]:raise:[/QUOTE] I'd say that's a clever way of saying "Wherever you go, we will find you."

[QUOTE=The Epidemic;30707814]So is NATO the international police force or something?[/QUOTE] Yeah

[QUOTE=Mabus;30708960]NATO is an old alliance made by the United States and number of western countries during the cold war to combat if necessary, the then growing threat of the Warsaw pact (USSR and its puppet states). The Warsaw pact is no more, and NATO is still around, so basically they now target countries that they deem either a threat to them, themselves (such as Libya) or another ally. So yes they are a bit like world police unfortunately.[/QUOTE] Actually, the Warsaw Pact (1955) came after NATO (1949), but yes, the growing threat of the Soviet Union was quite real, just to make a simple correction there. But I wish NATO would learn its lessons from Operation Allied Force.

obviously there cannot be virtue without violence

[QUOTE=Chopstick;30708884]NATOil up to it's old tricks again eh? Kill the leader for Libyan support, build alliance then ask for oil. [/QUOTE] Oh-hoho, it's funny because the word oil begins with the letter o, and there's an o at the end of NATO, implying NATO and oil is one and the same! Lame pun aside, when has NATO done something like this? Oh never. [quote]Explain why NATOil would be fighting this war other than for the needs of the rebels, I don't see any reason they wouldn't be doing it for oil. [/quote] Because the opposition specifically asked for NATO assistance, and because Gaddafi is a tyrannical nut who's committed barbaric crimes against Libyans, and because he did not uphold a international-mandated ceasefire. And yes, for oil. How is evil or greedy to make sure a major oil producing country remains stable, much more a country in the Mediterranean?

This is all I hear: :words:

[QUOTE=Uberman77883;30705827]Good job NATO. Also Italy should invade, they are at war with Libya.[/QUOTE] so is switzerland:kakashi:

NATO attacked Yugoslavia to steal their vast oil reserves too, you know.

[QUOTE=Chopstick;30708013]NATOil up to it's old tricks again eh? Kill the leader for Libyan support, build alliance then ask for oil.[/QUOTE] Weren't we buying a ton of Libyan oil before the civil war anyway? It's not like it's some big conspiracy theory that we use Libyan oil. Of course when we have an excuse to oust the dictator government in there we're going to take it.

[QUOTE=Chopstick;30708013]NATOil up to it's old tricks again eh? Kill the leader for Libyan support, build alliance then ask for oil.[/QUOTE] As if wanting oil is even a bad thing, it's the life blood of economies and countries are supposed to sustain their economies for the sake of their people. It's not like that's their only reason either, they DO care.

"Nato has been watching closely. Nato knows where you are and will continue to watch you." Oh my god NATO is Santa

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dV2wGdpBODw[/media]

Their broadcast when intervention began was cooler. [url]http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Usaf-ec-130j-transmitting-on-6877-0-khz-libya-20-march-2011.ogg[/url] Weird distortion makes it sound badass

[QUOTE=cccritical;30708264]but you agreed with someone that said a longer version of that[/QUOTE] No he didn't, you dolt. He agreed with something saying that the revolution is worse off with NATO hijacking it and that this will probably end up like every other war the US and allies have fought, with us influencing the future government for our benefit. Learn to read, bub.

[QUOTE=Detective P;30715540]No he didn't, you dolt. He agreed with something saying that the revolution is worse off with NATO hijacking it and that this will probably end up like every other war the US and allies have fought, with us influencing the future government for our benefit. Learn to read, bub.[/QUOTE] ITT: golds trolling golds.

[QUOTE=Elecbullet;30706376]:raise:[/QUOTE] They mean that he is calling them onto himself when he endangers the population and it's not NATO that chooses to attack, it's Gadaffi forcing them. Also NATO is not the Red Cross of course they aren't doing it because of good will.

[QUOTE=smurfy;30711145]NATO attacked Yugoslavia to steal their vast oil reserves too, you know.[/QUOTE] Actually there are huge natural resources in Kosovo (like huge huge), and NATO did succeed in making Camp Bondsteel after bombing.

hey team i may be late to the party but ignore jenkem he has a history of spewing bullshit just look at airsoft sub forum

:foxnews: 'NATO terrorises Gadaffi ; are Nato now terrorists? More later.':foxnews: