• Judge who forced Apple to publicly apologise now works for Samsung
    33 replies, posted
It's perfectly legal and therefore I have no worries about it. To suggest otherwise is a massively unfounded conspiracy theory based on a perceived motivation. The only thing I'm angered by is the fact that the article calls it ironic. Don't use words if you don't know their meaning.
Would be hilarious if apple had a paper republish their apology- this time noting at the bottom the former judge is now employed by Samsung
[QUOTE=H8Entitlement;39759344]Would be hilarious if apple had a paper republish their apology- this time noting at the bottom the former judge is now employed by Samsung[/QUOTE] [B]is now employed by Samsung.[/B] Not [B]"was a Samsung plant in the courts so they wouldn't need to pay any reparations for an illegitimate patent claim."[/B]
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;39753698]Not implying apple wasn't in the wrong with [B]their patent trolling[/B], and I hate to take the "corporations r all evil!!" stance, but I don't trust that shit for a second.[/QUOTE] Where did this idea come from that Apple is a patent troll? Nobody complains when other companies patent generic ideas (Not too long ago somebody patented the idea of hanging up a phone call), but when Apple patents something people freak out. Hell, HTC bought patents from Google for the sole purpose to sue Apple over them, but you don't see people calling HTC patent trolls.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.