Her fault for leaving a baby alone on the floor. Fucking bitch.
No puberty.
[editline]07:50AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Plasticnoob;21261960]Of course there is, I'm not saying there isn't. Obviously you can't go around impregnating women until you die. Being productive, being happy, all of that is good too. But in the end, the most important thing IS passing on your genes, because we ARE animals. We might have skyscrapers, cars, electricity, we might have gone to space, and we might have created medicines that can save lives. But we're still the same animals we always were, we're still the same cavemen trying to establish ourselves as much as we can so that we can reproduce, and keep our bloodlines going as long as possible.
[editline]07:29AM[/editline]
Yes, you caught me. I have no balls.[/QUOTE]
You're stupid and you should feel bad.
[QUOTE=Uberslug;21262097]quotes [/QUOTE]
Deciding not to and knowing that you can't are two different things. Sure, the baby could turn out to be gay, or maybe he wouldn't want to reproduce anyway. He'll suffer the same ridicule either way. In his early years, people will make fun of him until he breaks. When he's an adult, respect won't be an easy thing to come by, and he'll be seen as less masculine than other men, for the fact that he doesn't have testicles. Even if he didn't want to have children, casual sex isn't going to be a walk in the park either. He'll probably be a massive turn off. I said what I said because I pity this baby, not because he can't reproduce, but because his whole life he will be viewed as 'less' than the other men. He's going to deal with emotional trauma until the day he dies, regardless of whether or not he wanted to carry on his genes in the first place.
Dude.
You flat out contradicted yourself, there's no escaping it.
But on the bright side, that kid will be able to have sex without using a condom.
[QUOTE=HGrunt;21262193]But on the bright side, that kid will be able to have sex without using a condom.[/QUOTE]
STDs bro
[QUOTE=HGrunt;21262193]But on the bright side, that kid will be able to have sex without using a condom.[/QUOTE]
And on the upper note, he'll be fucking amazing at soprano.
Choir will be the perfect place for him
[QUOTE=Uberslug;21262179]Dude.
You flat out contradicted yourself, there's no escaping it.[/QUOTE]
Where?
I said the only main goal in life is to reproduce. I then said it is very possible to enjoy life without reproducing. That's not a contradiction, nowhere did I say that unless you reproduce you're going to be a miserable shit.
I said the baby should be euthanized, yes, but not because he can't reproduce, but to spare him the pain he will definitely receive throughout his life. So please show me where I contradicted myself.
[quote=plasticnoob;21261685]the baby should be euthanized too.[/quote]
[quote=plasticnoob;21262050]it is very possible to live a happy life without having kids.[/quote]
These two points are 100% contradictory unless you enjoy killing infants for kicks.
[QUOTE=Plasticnoob;21262221]Where?
I said the only main goal in life is to reproduce. I then said it is very possible to enjoy life without reproducing. That's not a contradiction, nowhere did I say that unless you reproduce you're going to be a miserable shit.
I said the baby should be euthanized, yes, but not because he can't reproduce, but to spare him the pain he will definitely receive throughout his life. So please show me where I contradicted myself.[/QUOTE]
Who says the only main goal in life is to procreate? how fucking backwards are you?
What the hell did they do to the dogs to make them randomly attack an infant?
Working in cohesion to simultaneously remove the diaper and bite off the testicles?
[editline]01:02AM[/editline]
Oh, they probably neutered them and they were looking for revenge.
[editline]01:03AM[/editline]
Parents are awful; should render them impotent as well.
[QUOTE=Plasticnoob;21262163]Deciding not to and knowing that you can't are two different things. Sure, the baby could turn out to be gay, or maybe he wouldn't want to reproduce anyway. He'll suffer the same ridicule either way. In his early years, people will make fun of him until he breaks. When he's an adult, respect won't be an easy thing to come by, and he'll be seen as less masculine than other men, for the fact that he doesn't have testicles. Even if he didn't want to have children, casual sex isn't going to be a walk in the park either. He'll probably be a massive turn off. I said what I said because I pity this baby, not because he can't reproduce, but because his whole life he will be viewed as 'less' than the other men. He's going to deal with emotional trauma until the day he dies, regardless of whether or not he wanted to carry on his genes in the first place.[/QUOTE]
You make it sound like he'll be showing everyone else his lack of balls.
They don't need to find out.
[QUOTE=Uberslug;21262231]These two points are 100% contradictory unless you enjoy killing infants for kicks.[/QUOTE]
No. Please read what I'm saying.
This baby's life is going to be hell. Not because he doesn't WANT to reproduce, but because he CAN'T. People are going to see this as a major weakness and will treat him as less than human forever. This isn't like being made fun of for a couple of years in middle school, this is something he's going to have to endure for the rest of his life.
I'm saying the baby should be spared of his pain, not put down because he can't have children.
I don't want to be the one who answers his question of where his balls went when he was young when he gets older :byodood:
Looks like this baby lost his [i]manhood[/i] before he got it.
[QUOTE=PrismatexV8;21262260]You make it sound like he'll be showing everyone else his lack of balls.
They don't need to find out.[/QUOTE]
If he plans on having any sort of sexual encounter at all, yes, people will find out.
God that's just so horrible...
[QUOTE=Plasticnoob;21262264]People are going to see this as a major weakness and will treat him as less than human forever.[/QUOTE]
You're the one who wants to euthanize him.
[QUOTE=Plasticnoob;21262264]I'm saying the baby should be spared of his pain, not put down because he can't have children.[/QUOTE]
One of your arguments is that his life is ruined because he does not have the choice to not have children. Isn't arguing to kill him before he has the choice himself hypocritical?
[QUOTE=Plasticnoob;21262264]This isn't like being made fun of for a couple of years in middle school[/QUOTE]
You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept that people will hardly care at all about whether or not he has testicles. People are [I]not[/I] in middle school when real life starts. I don't know what happened to you to cause you to be come so cynical about humanity (unless I was right about the puberty thing), but you need to be more realistic.
[editline]08:16AM[/editline]
TRIVIA TIME
What famous political party was responsible for this propaganda?
[img]http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/9462/film01.jpg[/img]
Translation: [I]Life, only as a burden.[/I]
[QUOTE=Uberslug;21262302]One of your arguments is that his life is ruined because he does not have the choice to not have children. Isn't arguing to kill him before he has the choice himself hypocritical?[/quote]
Before he has the choice? I don't think he has much of a choice anymore. And I didn't say his life would be ruined because he cannot reproduce, I said it would be ruined because of the way he will be treated. And yes, people will treat him like he's less than human.
[quote=Uberslug]You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept that people will hardly care at all about whether or not he has testicles. People are [I]not[/I] in middle school when real life starts. I don't know what happened to you to cause you to be come so cynical about humanity (unless I was right about the puberty thing), but you need to be more realistic.[/QUOTE]
Perhaps you should read what I'm saying. Nowhere did I say he'll be in middle school when this happens, I said the treatment he'll receive in the long run isn't going to be like getting picked on in middle school. As in, its going to be much worse, and its going to last the rest of his life. And yes, people WILL care if he doesn't have testicles. Imagine your balls were removed when you were an infant, and now you're trying to have sex with a woman. If your lack of balls doesn't gross her out, imagine trying to please her. You won't be able to. Without your testicles, your penis doesn't really serve any purpose besides pissing, its just a piece of meat hanging from your body.
You need to be more realistic. You can't blow this off like its no big deal, this is a baby's manhood stripped away before it could even start. This is going to have a major impact on the rest of his life.
Wow, the dogs fucking targeted that poor litte things testicles?
I've rarely, or never even possibly said this in my life, but I'm happy to see those fuckers put down, they ruined this fucking kids life potentially.
Ughh.
I expected myself to laugh, even when stoned to laugh at something like this, no way though that's fucking sickening.
Ughh is right.
[QUOTE=BBKF;21262392]Wow, the dogs fucking targeted that poor litte things testicles?
I've rarely, or never even possibly said this in my life, but I'm happy to see those fuckers put down, they ruined this fucking kids life potentially.[/QUOTE]
You don't blame dogs for this. They don't know any better.
It's the parent's fault. Who the fuck leaves an infant strapped into a chair with two pit bulls in the room? That's just asking for trouble. They are a large, strong, and fairly aggressive dog with a tenancy towards attacking kids.
[QUOTE=hypno-toad;21262458]You don't blame dogs for this. They don't know any better.
It's the parent's fault. Who the fuck leaves an infant strapped into a chair with two pit bulls in the room? That's just asking for trouble.[/QUOTE]
The childs seperated from her mother thankfully, I understand they're dogs, it's just honestly overly sickening.
I giggled.
[editline]07:31PM[/editline]
And now I feel bad.
[QUOTE=InsanePyro;21259210]Oh god the puns
And its gonna suck that the kid won't be able to have kids
But then again considering how smart the mom must be maybe its good this gene pool was given some chlorine[/QUOTE]
"Because the mom was a moron means the kid would be a moron :downs:"
[editline]05:34AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=hypno-toad;21262458]You don't blame dogs for this. They don't know any better.
It's the parent's fault. Who the fuck leaves an infant strapped into a chair with two pit bulls in the room? That's just asking for trouble. They are a large, strong, and fairly aggressive dog with a tenancy towards attacking kids.[/QUOTE]
My dogs know better than to attack people; atleast my poodle does. (Schnauzer is a little bit agressive but she has thyroid issues)
When my cousins come over my dogs are fairly well behaved and never attack them, they act much more gentle than usual because they know they're small children.
Dogs can think; this one was obviously stupid and horribly raised
Once again, how the dogs were raised [I]lies with the parents of the child.[/I]
Also, you poodle is not a pitbull. Read my post with your eyes and brain, not your ass.
Dogs roughly have the cognitive abilities of a human baby. The dog doesn't stop to think "oh hey, I might be hurting somebody by doing this," They are influenced entirely by instinct and learn through very primitive social abilities. A DOG ([B]especially not a pitbull[/B]) cannot be held responsible for any violent actions it does. A dog is only as good as it is bred and trained. Some Pitbulls (entirely regardless of how well they are trained) have a tenancy to snap for almost no reason; and those snaps tend to be a lot more lethal than those of poodles due to the size and mucle mass of the dog.
I'm not saying they shouldn't be euthanized, it's a hazard to have dogs like that. But it seems a lot of people have a tenancy of thinking as these dogs as criminals or something. I'm also not saying it's not safe to leave infants with dogs, I'm saying it's not safe to leave them with [U]pitbulls[/U].
They should give him some fake dog balls so he at least feels like a man.
[img]http://www.trendhunter.com/images/phpthumbnails/7063_1_468c.jpeg[/img]
No, those aren't jelly beans.
[QUOTE=hypno-toad;21262850]Once again, how the dogs were raised [I]lies with the parents of the child.[/I]
Also, you poodle is not a pitbull. Read my post with your eyes and brain, not your ass.
Dogs roughly have the cognitive abilities of a human baby. The dog doesn't stop to think "oh hey, I might be hurting somebody by doing this," They are influenced entirely by instinct and learn through very primitive social abilities. A DOG ([B]especially not a pitbull[/B]) cannot be held responsible for any violent actions it does. A dog is only as good as it is bred and trained. Some Pitbulls (entirely regardless of how well they are trained) have a tenancy to snap for almost no reason; and those snaps tend to be a lot more lethal than those of poodles due to the size and mucle mass of the dog.
I'm not saying they shouldn't be euthanized, it's a hazard to have dogs like that. But it seems a lot of people have a tenancy of thinking as these dogs as criminals or something. I'm also not saying it's not safe to leave infants with dogs, I'm saying it's not safe to leave them with [U]pitbulls[/U].[/QUOTE]
Not all Pitbulls are aggressive; that's a horrible stereotype of animals. I was using my poodle as an example, there is aggressive poodles and than there is gentle ones.
I really don't care because it's 6 AM and this all very meaningless to me so lol.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.