• Panel of the world’s leading climate scientists comes to conclusion that, with 95% certainty, most o
    72 replies, posted
[QUOTE=popbob;42329909]Anyone can be paid to lie.[/QUOTE] Everything is a lie. [editline]29th September 2013[/editline] We a all really part of the dream of an alien toddler called Fnorp from the planet Tnksxzpñjata
[QUOTE=bravehat;42342691]Like I said earlier in the thread, there's no point debating with denialists, they're fucking willfully retarded, just leave them to wallow in their own stupidity.[/QUOTE]Can't really risk that, many denialists vote or hold public offices. I would agree that debating with denialists on the Internet, especially Facepunch is a futile endeavour; unlikely to hold a public office and most don't or can't vote.
[QUOTE=Sgt Doom;42343316]Can't really risk that, many denialists vote or hold public offices. I would agree that debating with denialists on the Internet, especially Facepunch is a futile endeavour; unlikely to hold a public office and most don't or can't vote.[/QUOTE] Yeah but no one will debate it with someone that holds public office, or they'll again be too entrenched in their retarded ideals to do anything about it.
It must be true, scientists said it. No way scientists can be wrong by any means. I mean if a leading scientist says: "Most Global warming was not our fault" He will lose his reputation and is no longer leading. (Example: Lord Kelvin hating on people who believe heavier-than-air objects can fly or people hating on Einstein). Let the dumb ratings rain, I like to see how many people believe everything because politicians of their favorite party or "leading" (a.k.a. conventional) scientist said the same.
[QUOTE=TorashVD;42344726]It must be true, scientists said it. No way scientists can be wrong by any means. I mean if a leading scientist says: "Most Global warming was not our fault" He will lose his reputation and is no longer leading. (Example: Lord Kelvin hating on people who believe heavier-than-air objects can fly or people hating on Einstein). Let the dumb ratings rain, I like to see how many people believe everything because politicians of their favorite party or "leading" (a.k.a. conventional) scientist said the same.[/QUOTE] It's not really that bad to believe something when 98 or 99 % of the educated people on the subject say it's one way Also, if a leading scientist says "Global Warming wasn't our fault" and not produce non-shit evidence, then he deserves to loose his reputation
[QUOTE=TorashVD;42344726]It must be true, scientists said it. No way scientists can be wrong by any means. I mean if a leading scientist says: "Most Global warming was not our fault" He will lose his reputation and is no longer leading. (Example: Lord Kelvin hating on people who believe heavier-than-air objects can fly or people hating on Einstein). Let the dumb ratings rain, I like to see how many people believe everything because politicians of their favorite party or "leading" (a.k.a. conventional) scientist said the same.[/QUOTE] I'm pretty sure there's a difference between one famous scientist being wrong in a field he doesn't study much or doesn't have the proper tools for, and the vast majority of scientists specifically studying one thing all agreeing on one conclusion based on tons of evidence and studies. But [I]no[/I], let's just assume that the vast majority is wrong and the tiny minority is right because "people can be wrong!" We're not believing them because "ooh they're famous so they must be right", we're believing them because "holy shit look at this mountain of evidence".
The greenhouse effect is natural. But thanks to the emission of CO2, we've intensified that effect. That's global warming. Global warming is not the effect where CO2 and other gases keep the planet warm, nor is it the natural cycle of ice ages. The word in itself implies it's not natural.
I'm all for spending every last resourceful fragment we can find on our planet, because it will be facing a certain heat death eventually anyway. But yes, that's so far ahead in the future so I hope won't get wiped out by something as pathetic as global warming by excessive CO2 emissions.
[QUOTE=Bat-shit;42344919]I'm all for spending every last resourceful fragment we can find on our planet, because it will be facing a certain heat death eventually anyway. But yes, that's so far ahead in the future so I hope won't get wiped out by something as pathetic as global warming by excessive CO2 emissions.[/QUOTE] It won't be the CO2 that kills us, it'll be the Methane and the fact that large tracts of current farmland will become unusable.
[QUOTE=TorashVD;42344726]It must be true, scientists said it. No way scientists can be wrong by any means. I mean if a leading scientist says: "Most Global warming was not our fault" He will lose his reputation and is no longer leading. (Example: Lord Kelvin hating on people who believe heavier-than-air objects can fly or people hating on Einstein). Let the dumb ratings rain, I like to see how many people believe everything because politicians of their favorite party or "leading" (a.k.a. conventional) scientist said the same.[/QUOTE] The reason he lost his reputation is because his research was probably shit. The arctic IS warming dude. There's hardly any ice left there.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.