• SomethingAwful starts campaign to label Reddit as a child pornography hub. Urging users to contact c
    544 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Sanius;34674913]why would you essentially post a banme after spending money to give somebody a title do you seriously have nothing better to do[/QUOTE] he was mad because someone was "effectively saying [his] father is a pedophile," his father WAS a pedophile, I made it less "effectively" and more "definitely." this isn't a "banme." sorry if calling out pedophiles offends you. i realize reddit's pedophile-sympathizing culture is a part of FP in part due to the user pool being the same, but it needs to be done.
soda you fucked up the title it doesn't even look good and the title was an argument that was blatantly rebuked way to waste $10 [img]http://imgur.com/fMISG.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Soda;34674959]he was mad because someone was "effectively saying [his] father is a pedophile," his father WAS a pedophile, I made it less "effectively" and more "definitely." this isn't a "banme." sorry if calling out pedophiles offends you. i realize reddit's pedophile-sympathizing culture is a part of FP in part due to the user pool being the same, but it needs to be done.[/QUOTE] I'm sorry, but I don't see why people hate pedophilia so much. Being a pedophile is harmless unless the pedophile sexually assaults a child for their own pleasure. I hardly ever see people actually explaining why pedophilia is wrong other than "they're attracted to children!" or "they're dirty pedophiles just cause!" Edit: Care to explain how a pedophile doing nothing to anybody is harmful, roflburger?
The title forced on Rubs10 should be removed, and Soda shouldn't even get a refund.
[QUOTE=Soda;34674959]he was mad because someone was "effectively saying [his] father is a pedophile," his father WAS a pedophile, I made it less "effectively" and more "definitely." this isn't a "banme." sorry if calling out pedophiles offends you. i realize reddit's pedophile-sympathizing culture is a part of FP in part due to the user pool being the same, but it needs to be done.[/QUOTE] lmao you don't even know his father yet alone whether or not he's a pedophile even if he was a pedophile you're being a huge fucking ass
[QUOTE=Sanius;34675008]lmao you don't even know his father yet alone whether or not he's a pedophile even if he was a pedophile you're being a huge fucking ass[/QUOTE] what? have you not read the thread? his father had sex w/ a minor, and he was 5 years older at the time. he posted this. this is literally the definition of a pedophile. even being close to the legal age would be just seriously awful. 17y/o coerced into fathering child with 22y/o. not even allowed to live any of her adult life before being forced into parenthood by a smarter, more experienced adult pedophile.
[QUOTE=Soda;34674959] his father WAS a pedophile [/QUOTE] hahaha you think pedophilia = statutory rape which isn't even rape in the first place are you dumb or what
[QUOTE=Soda;34675025]what? have you not read the thread? his father had sex w/ a minor, and he was 5 years older at the time. he posted this. this is literally the definition of a pedophile.[/QUOTE] no it isn't
[QUOTE=Soda;34675025] this is literally the definition of a pedophile.[/QUOTE] [B] STATUTORY[/B]
it's ephebophilia not paedophilia
[QUOTE=Bawbag;34672140]So if I were to take a photo of you and your 7 year old sister, and then upload it for millions to splooge over, you'd be cool with that? ....Really?[/QUOTE] there's a difference with siblings, whether she's 7 or 27 nobody wants the entire internet masturbating to a photo of his sister, especially a younger sister
[QUOTE=FunnyBunny;34674971]soda you fucked up the title it doesn't even look good and the title was an argument that was blatantly rebuked way to waste $10 [img]http://imgur.com/fMISG.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] I kind of want someone (or myself) to change his title to "I spent $10 on a misunderstanding and I didn't even do it right", but I don't want anyone to waste money.
It's funny how in this thread people are just bashing reddit whole, instead of just the creators of said subreddits. It's like judging facepunch by OIFY But personally I am really glad they got rid of those subreddits. About 132 subreddits more and reddit may become a slightly better place
[QUOTE=Soda;34675025]even being close to the legal age would be just seriously awful. 17y/o coerced into fathering child with 22y/o. not even allowed to live any of her adult life before being forced into parenthood by a smarter, more experienced adult pedophile.[/QUOTE] That doesn't make sense. Is it impossible for a 17 year old to consensually have sex with 22 year old?
[QUOTE=Soda;34675025] 22y/o. not even allowed to live any of her adult life before being forced into parenthood by a smarter, more experienced adult pedophile.[/QUOTE] implying that age = smarts
[QUOTE=thisispain;34674863]well pedophile generally refers to prepubescent children. maybe you're pissed off because you don't really know what pedophile means?[/QUOTE] Oh I'm sorry I thought the topic at hand was rather or not to label jailbait as pedophilic, which if you read the list of boards deleted, only 2 of them were pedophilic, while the rest of them were jailbait boards. [QUOTE=thisispain;34674863]i think you're acting suspiciously defensive. "pedophilia is bad" "IS THERE SOME REASON WHY AN 18 YEAR OLD CAN'T HAVE SEX WITH A 16 YEAR OLD??"[/QUOTE] That would be valid, except for the fact the posters in this thread are labeling anyone who likes to look at 14 and 16 year olds looking sexy(the definition of jailbait) as pedophiles, then justifying it as 'well think about the 10 year old being raped by a 30 year old!' as their platform, because apparently the actual official definition of pedophile (wanting to rape 4-12 year olds and a medically defined mental disorder) is the same as the biological attraction to wanting to have sex with girls after puberty. (which is medically considered a normal evolutionary function).
[QUOTE=Last or First;34675108]but I don't want anyone to waste money.[/QUOTE] agreed, this would be a large portion of FP's allowances nice responses though. "It's not pedophilia, it's ephebophilia!" it's like FP is some kind of twilight zone SA where everyone is actually a redditor. [QUOTE=superstepa;34675118]It's funny how in this thread people are just bashing reddit whole, instead of just the creators of said subreddits. It's like judging facepunch by OIFY But personally I am really glad they got rid of those subreddits. About 132 subreddits more and reddit may become a slightly better place[/QUOTE] deleting subreddits isn't going to make their userbase any less awful.
[QUOTE=Soda;34675151] nice responses though. "It's not pedophilia, it's ephebophilia!" [/QUOTE] uh but it is pedophilia is when the child is prepubescent, ephebophilia is when the child is between 15-19 that's not really defending pedophilia, that's just clarifying the nomenclature.
[QUOTE=Soda;34675151]agreed, this would be a large portion of FP's allowances[/QUOTE] Woh man. I'm so glad that Soda, who is clearly the master of maturity as demonstrated by him paying $10 to title someone as a pedophile, is calling a large portion of FP children.
[QUOTE=Soda;34675025]what? have you not read the thread? his father had sex w/ a minor, and he was 5 years older at the time. he posted this. [B]this is literally the definition of a pedophile.[/B][/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV TR] Table I. DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic Criteria for Pedophilia A. Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children [B](generally age 13 years [U]or younger[/U])[/B]. B. The person has acted on these sexual urges, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty. C. The person is at least age 16 years and at least 5 years older than the child or children in Criterion A. [B]Note: [U]Do not include[/U] an individual in late adolescence involved in an ongoing sexual relationship with a 12- or 13-year-old.[/B][/QUOTE] Fuck off dickhead [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Flaming" - Swebonny))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Soda;34675151] deleting subreddits isn't going to make their userbase any less awful.[/QUOTE] Every userbase is awful nowadays
[QUOTE=thisispain;34675172]uh but it is pedophilia is when the child is prepubescent, ephebophilia is when the child is between 15-19 that's not really defending pedophilia, that's just clarifying the nomenclature.[/QUOTE] can we clarify something else: do you support the rape of children? saying it's just ephebophilia is pretty supportive of the man's urges towards minors tbh, when society as a whole recognizes pedophilia more readily.
[QUOTE=FunnyBunny;34675035][B] STATUTORY[/B][/QUOTE] They were married, age of consent is 14 in the State of Texas, when married regardless of the age of the older partner.
[QUOTE=Soda;34675215]can we clarify something else: do you support the rape of children? saying it's just ephebophilia is pretty supportive of the man's urges towards minors tbh, when society as a whole recognizes pedophilia more readily.[/QUOTE] 15-19 year-olds are not targets of pedophiles and they can hardly be considered children biologically anyway
[QUOTE=Soda;34675215]can we clarify something else: do you support the rape of children? saying it's just ephebophilia is pretty supportive of the man's urges towards minors tbh, when society as a whole recognizes pedophilia more readily.[/QUOTE] i think when it comes to adolescents in their later teens it becomes a lot less of a uneasy and horrible thing for them to be sexually involved with people. at that point the man being older is more creepy than something illegal and morally reprehensible. in the case of paedophilia, IE pre-pubescent childeren and very young teenagers i find it horrible and completely wrong.
[QUOTE=Soda;34675215]can we clarify something else: do you support the rape of children? saying it's just ephebophilia is pretty supportive of the man's urges towards minors tbh, when society as a whole recognizes pedophilia more readily.[/QUOTE] According to you, law makers in a majority of Europe are pedophiles and want to let their citizens rape children, ether that or you are a fucking idiot [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/47/Age_of_Consent_eu.png[/IMG]
[img]http://i42.tinypic.com/ok7dwg.png[/img]
SA didn't order anything did some butthurt redditor make that?
what the fuck is spacedicks
[QUOTE=Ordigenius;34675474]what the fuck is spacedicks[/QUOTE] A circlejerk full of gore, scat porn, and any other things that make normal people cringe.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.