• Female only company fails terribly.
    174 replies, posted
To get members, they had to find other sexist. Sexist attitudes and the serious kind, not our lol sexism kind, is arrogance. So this company was out looking for the most arrogant workers they could get. Great formula for a successful utopia. Female or not, though I can't imagine them all being female helping, you can't run a company on a giant pack of jerks.
Women just can't work together, it's the truth.
[QUOTE=Fronze;14585859]this is why women should stay in the kitchen god dammit[/QUOTE] Exactly, they're too naturally dodgy. [editline]08:23PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Yobdren;14611029]Oh wait? What's this? thisisafag is on another misinformed puberty fueled rage? First off, give us your sources. Second off, did you notice how many professors of higher education are males? That's right. I've never seen a female college professor. Statistics show that males are more employed as higher educators. So before you go off saying that they're in those jobs, consider where their training is from. Thirdly, you want to know why they're up there? Because they can't handle the blue collar jobs that fuel America, where over 80% of those employed are MEN. This is because men are genetically more capable than women. Men are stronger, more durable, more rigid, and generally better than women. Also, allow me to take you back to a time known as twenty years ago, where most of those employed in higher education jobs were men. Why is this? Women had rights then. They'd had rights for plenty of time. So where were they? Not caring. The reason so many women are in higher education jobs is because of the "I bet you I can do this" mindset. They're trying to prove something that we don't give a fuck about. Hey, want to know another thing? Men were in charge for most of history. And don't pull any, "Women didn't have rights" bullshit. Anyone could have stood up and done something. Sure, they would have been killed if they acted alone, but then how did they get rights now? Because they became coordinated. Men have been coordinating for years, and only now do women walk in and start to work together. Studies also show that men will work as a team better than most women. Hey wanna know a fun fact? I go to class with women, and most of them don't know jack shit about what they're doing. Call me sexist, but you just got a smackdown of knowledge.[/QUOTE] Why thisispain tried to refute this, I'm not quite sure. He's too full of himself :B
[QUOTE=Fronze;14585859]this is why women should stay in the kitchen god dammit[/QUOTE] this is why people like you should get their ass's kicked
Men are naturally better than women.
I love how they call a WOMAN strong-minded. [QUOTE=arimi;16129967]this is why people like you should get their ass's kicked[/QUOTE] :smug:
Women use emotion to solve problems instead of logic, which makes them a nightmare to work with. There's exceptions, but eventually all of them wind up doing the same shit when pushed far enough. There's nothing worse than a dramatic emotional female boss. You have no idea until you've worked under one.
[QUOTE=snuwoods;16128487] Why thisispain tried to refute this, I'm not quite sure. He's too full of himself :B[/QUOTE] I refuted it because he was full of shit. now you are going to start and every time you do i completely humiliate you so i have no idea why you keep coming on to me [editline]07:39PM[/editline] [QUOTE=DrMortician;16130222]Women use emotion to solve problems instead of logic, which makes them a nightmare to work with.[/QUOTE] It just sounds like you're just butthurt and pissed at mentioned female boss.
If you want to work with only women you should get a job in Great Clips or Fantastic Sams or something.
To be honest, you don't really see women wanting to design painful, genocidal utilities of war. On the other hand, I'll explain why men tend to make better plans, and why women tend to tear each other apart - natural selection. Yes, because men had to sit there and figure out a way of getting mammoths off a cliff, means that we had to evolve the required genes in our Y chromosomes because we were the hunters. Women had to usually deal with children and other humans more often than men, so naturally they're better at understanding and dealing with people than men. Explaining why we have the urge to beat the hell out of our best friend rather than just trying to talk it out - We aren't as evolved to do that as women are. On the other hand, because women have the unfortunate task of gestating, rather than just planting semen, they have had to literally evolve to fight over men for their genes (or in recent times, it's replaced by personal gain) against one another on a daily basis. In other words, they fight with each other more because they have something to fight against each other for, men instead have to work together to kill the mammoth, or more lately, finish a project ( aka personal gain). After that, [b]then[/b] they tear each other apart, for their own benefit (credibility, money, saber-tooth meat).
[QUOTE=FoodStuffs;14590769]i don't think gender segregated jobs exist anymore if it seems like it it's only because there aren't many members of the gender who want to actually take the job. it's not a matter of which gender is stronger or has certain traits the other doesn't, it's a matter of the concentration of strong or individuals suited for that job in that certain gender. there are more strong men than there are women, which is why construction is male dominated.[/QUOTE] I like this guy.
Oh god. A bunch of things about that article made me rage. First thing, it's bound to be exaggerated sensationalism by the Daily Fail. But secondly - it probably was like the recount. People who work in TV seem so fuckin' shallow sometimes, regardless of gender. Argh. Also, this thread is brimming with "HURF DURF PERIODS HURF HORMONES" bollocks - and to the guy who said 'oh, I go to class with a bunch of girls and they know jack shit', well, [b]so do I.[/b] They're pleasant to work with, we're all fine at working as a team, and they're damn good at the course. Some women will be bitchier than others - but so, judging by this thread, will some men. If someone's being a cunt, they need a smack in the face, regardless of gender. [img]http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/images/duke-nukem.jpg[/img]
I belive the more appropriate statement we can make from all this is... Feminists are stupid, not women.
Heh, solid evidence that women can't run things.
[QUOTE=Used Car Salesman;16136521]Heh, solid evidence that women can't run things.[/QUOTE] Or drive things.
[QUOTE=Ergolicious;16136765]Or drive things.[/QUOTE] Well, that's more of an asian thing. [editline]10:55AM[/editline] Regardless, we can agree that women should primarily raise the kids and stay in the kitchen.
[quote]The venomous women were supposedly the talented employees bla bla bla.[/quote] Holy shit, women and talented in the same sentance!
I bet they are all ugly. All femininists are.
[QUOTE=Electrocuter;14590490]Remember back before WW2 when there was a shit load of men-only jobs? This didn't happen. There's plenty of men-only jobs today also and this doesn't happen.[/QUOTE] Mining, it doesn't get anymore manly or hardcore. I really want to become a miner now for some reason...
Maybe if the company was a restaurant... and they had male employees outside the kitchen. :smug:
Sorry T_minus10, I couldn't read your post because I can't stop looking at your avatar.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.