• Battlefield 3: 64-Player on PC, Teaser
    227 replies, posted
Damnit, I just bought Bad company 2 because I was craving for a new battlefield experience and now I can spend money on yet another one soon.
That font is ugly though. They should remove that moderngamish touch like every new FPS has. Its annoying.
[QUOTE=Jack_Ghetto;27852147]64 players gives me hope. That's the Battlefield spirit, big battles.[/QUOTE] 64 times more matchmaking!
but is it better than BRO OPS?!?!?!?!?!?!
Not that hard to be better than Black Cocks.
im pretty sure we had 64 players when CS came out
Stop fucking comparing [i]Battlefield[/i] to [i]Call of Duty[/i], they're [b]NOT THE SAME[/b].
I hope to see Wake Island again!
Atleast BC2 did it in a "realistic" way, not in a overdone way.
[QUOTE=H4ngman;27852432]Damnit, I just bought Bad company 2 because I was craving for a new battlefield experience and now I can spend money on yet another one soon.[/QUOTE] It's not like it's comming out next month, though. The release date is around Autumn, which is a good 8 or so months away, by which time you'll have done with BC2. Anyway, by the sounds of it, this could well be better than BF2. Hell, all BF2 needs is a big graphics overhall and destructable environments.
I'm so teased by this..
[QUOTE=koekje4life V2;27852816]Stop fucking comparing [i]Battlefield[/i] to [i]Call of Duty[/i], they're [b]NOT THE SAME[/b].[/QUOTE] If you [b]BOLD AND CAPITALIZE[/b] parts of your sentence, [b]PEOPLE TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY.[/b]
World at War already had it. And I believe some other games as well. But I'm still excited.
Wow that teaser was everything I hoped it wouldn't be and more
[QUOTE=The golden;27852819]"The best online vehicle warfare experience gets even better" I don't ever recall the vehicles in any BF gaming being "Best vehicle warfare". In fact, I distinctly remember them being quite frustrating. [editline]4th February 2011[/editline] Considering how many games are trying to rip each other off at this point, that argument no longer stands. Bad Company had "perks" for fucks sake.[/QUOTE] I still don't see how you can compare a complete arcade hollywood shooter to a semi-realistic shooter.
Just the title of this thread made my fucking day. Hell yea DICE. Can't wait for GDC. [editline]4th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;27853247]Wow that teaser was everything I hoped it wouldn't be and more[/QUOTE] The only exciting part was the text ABOVE the video. Looked like the video was something they just whipped up yesterday.
I guess I have leave XP..
Man I hope there will be a good Pre-Order/Special Edition Pack for this game. This is one of the very few games I will actually consider buying special if it comes with some goodies. I am pretty glad about the 64 player count. You know how much hell it would be a commander and help your team with drops when you have to take care of 63 players? Not to mention, all hell breaking loose with 128 players basically destroying everything.
Awesome.
Cant wait.
One of the best teasers I've ever seen I think. The really quiet BF theme throughout and then the big reveal at the end make me wanna fuck bitches
[QUOTE=Datsun;27854148]Man I hope there will be a good Pre-Order/Special Edition Pack for this game. This is one of the very few games I will actually consider buying special if it comes with some goodies. I am pretty glad about the 64 player count. You know how much hell it would be a commander and help your team with drops when you have to take care of 63 players? Not to mention, all hell breaking loose with 128 players basically destroying everything.[/QUOTE] Um, it's 64 players total, not 64vs64. :colbert:
[QUOTE=Cloak Raider;27851654]eh, battlefield 2 was like the best online shooter ever made for me, so I'm willing to cut them some slack for a poor trailer.[/QUOTE] teaser
Might as well start saving now. Unless it's a total flop I'm no doubt picking this one up.
[QUOTE=Legolas;27854334]Um, it's 64 players total, not 64vs64. :colbert:[/QUOTE] Thats what he said. He's glad it's not 128.
[QUOTE=Legolas;27854334]Um, it's 64 players total, not 64vs64. :colbert:[/QUOTE] PC = 64 Players Xbox & PS3 = 24 players
[QUOTE=matt54;27854355]PC = 64 Players Xbox & PS3 = 24 players[/QUOTE] 24 players? :lol::lol::lol:
When didn't Battlefield have jets? o.O Good news though. Also, by the time net tech is advanced enough to be able to provide affordable servers with enough bandwidth for 128 players on these games, the maps will have become big enough to justify it, probably with multiple "sub-teams" on each side. That's another story, anyway. One that takes place a good 8 years or so into the future, too.
[QUOTE=sami-elite;27854352]Thats what he said. He's glad it's not 128.[/QUOTE] Oh right, crap, sorry, bad reading. :saddowns:
I've wanted to see this for a long time. Considering the maps DICE make for Battlefield are massive, a 64 player game would absolutely beast. But the chat log would be one long line of FFFFUUUU-
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.