[QUOTE=Kookas;27854751]When didn't Battlefield have jets? o.O[/QUOTE]
Battlefield ≠ Bad Company.
It's not that hard people.
Worrying for everyone how the maps will be consistent across each platform, not a clusterfuck on PC or boring on console.
They need to bring back Karkand and Bay of Oman.
Hopefully they're going to add some sort of pilot proficiency so there's not going to be half the server waiting for a plane or a helicopter.
I want Project Reality 2.0, I couldn't give less of a fuck about Battlefield 3 itself.
What exactly will keep this from being Battlefield 2 v2 (now with a destructible environment!)?
[QUOTE=Kecske;27851373]Any info about the enemies?
All I've seen in the trailer was US equipment and an unidentifiable jet.[/QUOTE]
If I'm correct, that 'jet' was a MIG fighter from BF2. You can find it in Sandbox if you're too lazy.
[QUOTE=Starpluck;27850292]They should of went over 64 players imo.[/QUOTE]
If it went any higher the cost of servers would be huge.
I hope it's more of a 'modern warfare' feel that the 1995-2004 games had.
Also an RPS article without a pun in the title.
[QUOTE=MisterM;27855042]Worrying for everyone how the maps will be consistent across each platform, not a clusterfuck on PC or boring on console.[/QUOTE]
Perhaps they are going to use the same system they did for BF2, several of the same maps just changed around and made smaller for different player counts.
Wouldn't it be great if they made it dynamic (as in, it's on say 16 player setting and four people join so it ups to 32 player mode or something)?
please let there be zipwires and grapple hooks and a cheeky bit of c4 on the side :D
[QUOTE=Starpluck;27850292]They should of went over 64 players imo.[/QUOTE]
have you played bf2 with 64 players? its retarded
no one actually plays the game like it should be, so its just a clusterfuck
:damn:
Drag your teammates, mount your weapons, more jets.
Dis gun b good!
64-players is so yesteday, what we need is 128 players!
[QUOTE=Alex_DeLarge;27855434]I want Project Reality 2.0, I couldn't give less of a fuck about Battlefield 3 itself.[/QUOTE]
Box Fortress
i cant wait for this game, im buying it on launch!
ugh, more "massive destruction"?
[QUOTE=MisterM;27855042]Worrying for everyone how the maps will be consistent across each platform, not a clusterfuck on PC or boring on console.[/QUOTE]
I'm guessing the console version will be a Battlefield 3: Modern Combat or so.
[QUOTE=Tools;27856508]64-players is so yesteday, what we need is 128 players![/QUOTE]
Fuck 128, let's go straight to 256!
Can't wait to fly them jets!
On a serious note, aren't we nearing the area where battlefield games should be +128 players?
We have the server power for it, and the average desktop computer playing those games anyways would be able to handle all the information.
I think my heart stopped.
Okay that's it. I'm starting to save up money so I can buy a good desktop PC that is going to be able to run this smoothly on highest graphics.
[QUOTE=-ZeeBo-;27857234]Okay that's it. I'm starting to save up money so I can buy a good desktop PC that is going to be able to run this smoothly on highest graphics.[/QUOTE]
What's awesome is that you don't need too much anymore :D
After Duty Calls, I'll never look at these trailers the same way again.
This one was pretty bad too.
256 would be amazing.
It would be like MAG except good.
Already pre-ordered on ea store!
try this code vf9t6zmjh
[QUOTE=Starpluck;27850292]They should of went over 64 players imo.[/QUOTE]
64 is more than enough.
Well I've gotten this far without buying $60 PC games but I guess I'm going to have to give it up and finally drop them on this. Hopefully it'll actually be worth it.
[QUOTE=redBadger;27858676]64 is more than enough.[/QUOTE]
I'm not happy until 2048-player battles.
[QUOTE=Swiket;27859884]I'm not happy until 2048-player battles.[/QUOTE]
I am not happy until unlimited players
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.