I think it would be better if they release in 2012, it's an excellent year for 10th anniversary.
[QUOTE=johan_sm;27860100]I am not happy until unlimited players[/QUOTE]
I'm not happy until full VR integration.
Seriously, how awesome would it be to actually be in a game like Battlefield?.
to be right in the middle of all this over the top action, to see and hear the clattering of machine gun fire, to feel the shock of an explosion that rips a building apart, to smell the odor gunpowder ever present in the air.
...but then a Tank rolls by with Polka music blaring out it's PA system.
Best game ever.
They should just let people decide on how many players they want, instead of having a predefined limit. Kinda like Arma 2. Realtime radiosity you say, Dice?
Damn, super epic, 64 players again :D
Call of duty got re-pwned.
Larger maps and mod tools, please.
Fall 2011? That's soon!
[QUOTE=Swiket;27859884]I'm not happy until 2048-player battles.[/QUOTE]
An MMO set on a single Battlefield would be simply amazing. If technologically infeasible?
[QUOTE]ability to go prone[/QUOTE]
I can't count the amount of times this would've saved my ass in Bad Company 2.
[QUOTE=Billiam;27862482]I can't count the amount of times this would've saved my ass in Bad Company 2.[/QUOTE]
Indeed. "Oh crap, I'm in the open and there is a concrete wall in front of me I better take cover." Then I proceed to get shot in the head.
I can't count the times how useful it would be to chip out a piece of a concrete wall, go prone with an lmg, and rain hell on advancing enemies until one drops a uav shell on you.
[QUOTE=redBadger;27858676]64 is more than enough.[/QUOTE]
I'd expect Battlefield series to once again up the number of players on the field, in a non-MMO game. I expected them to raise it to 128 players, at least. Sure, this would require bigger maps for one thing (but of correct size, least the individual players will get lost (non-snipers of course, Snipers are best to hide alone)). But on the other hand, it would finally make squads useful.
My Bro: "If prone was in bad company 2, recon would be imposible to spot." Me: "Exacly."
[QUOTE=blown25;27850277]holy dog
this will beat call of duty hard[/QUOTE]
No it will come nowhere close, Call Of Duty is unbelievably popular whereas Battlefield is popular to a much lesser extent. COD will probably not be beaten for many years
[editline]4th February 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Awegner;27863807]My Bro: "If prone was in bad company 2, recon would be imposible to spot." Me: "Exacly."[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah that'd be totally fun not being able to see campers
I mean not like BC2 already has a camping problem or anything
I came buckets.
[QUOTE=Tetracycline;27864056]No it will come nowhere close, Call Of Duty is unbelievably popular whereas Battlefield is popular to a much lesser extent. COD will probably not be beaten for many years
[editline]4th February 2011[/editline]
Oh yeah that'd be totally fun not being able to see campers
I mean not like BC2 already has a camping problem or anything[/QUOTE]
Bitches bitch about my sniper skill.
I highly disliked that teaser, but hope that the game is amazing. I really hope that it will be at least.
This will be amazing
Will it have the destruction engine?
[QUOTE=Awegner;27863807]My Bro: "If prone was in bad company 2, recon would be imposible to spot." Me: "Exacly."[/QUOTE]
Well then they'd actually have to making sniping difficult.
And then servers would be brimming with even more useless snipers.
[QUOTE=Awegner;27864393]Will it have the destruction engine?[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I don't really like it, not usefull at all to me.
[QUOTE=FullStreak12;27864466]Yeah, I don't really like it, not usefull at all to me.[/QUOTE]
But still it gives a sense of SOME realism.
I think it's kinda sad that the only thing I'm looking forward to in this game is something that isn't new.
Jets, prone and 64-player servers. Stuff that was in BF2.
Teaser trailers don't get any more vague then that folks :v:
The trailer shows nothing, yet everyone is actually excited aabout the trailer. I dont want another "Frostbite" game. (MoH...)
[QUOTE=SEKCobra;27866158][B]The trailer shows nothing[/B], yet everyone is actually excited aabout the trailer. I dont want another "Frostbite" game. (MoH...)[/QUOTE]
That's because it's a teaser. Not a trailer.
[QUOTE=Randdalf;27862085]An MMO set on a single Battlefield would be simply amazing. If technologically infeasible?[/QUOTE]
Well, the budget would have to be high, but this is impossible since it would also have to be multi-platform to allow a higher budget.
Then, consoles have shitty-ass hardware, which won't be able to handle more than 30 players, so the PC version can't have it.
It's a loop.
Good now give consoles 32.
just wait, the cover is going to be a soldier holding an M16 walking twords the camera with his head down, in a monochrome background.
What is with this pre-order garbage everyone is doing? Back in the day, when I pre-ordered, it was because it would take 2 months for the store to get stock of the damn game.
please let them use VAC, Call of Duty learnt to, let Battlefield learn too!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.