• Kurds raise all-female battalions to fight ISIS - think they will go to Hell if killed by a woman.
    92 replies, posted
Actually this seems like a religious nut website [url]http://clashdaily.com/2014/08/hey-peta-god-gave-man-stewardship-animals-entails-hunting-eating/[/url] Are there any other sources on this because this source seems full of shit
What's next, bacon airstrikes?
The British armed forces don't allow women on their front lines. The only way a woman came become front line infantry is if she trains as a combat medic.
[QUOTE=Holt!;45756253]The British armed forces don't allow women on their front lines. The only way a woman came become front line infantry is if she trains as a combat medic.[/QUOTE] Only reason for that is we are old as fuck of a military, we can't get with the times
[QUOTE=Holt!;45756253]The British armed forces don't allow women on their front lines. The only way a woman came become front line infantry is if she trains as a combat medic.[/QUOTE] Up until WWI, it was required for British soldiers to keep a well-groomed mustache. Which is silly. Why would you no longer need a well-groomed mustache by WWI? Surely, now it's [I]world[/I] war, you'd need mustaches now more than ever!
[QUOTE=PrusseLusken;45756638]how about you realize women in combat isn't about sexism it's about the fact that they'll never be equal to men in combat situations[/QUOTE] There are female atheletes better than every user on facepunch. There are more accurate snipers, there are women with more resolve and courage than you or I. It should be a meritocracy. To tell someone "you are worse" than others with no hope of actually proving themselves is as bad as racism.
[QUOTE=draugur;45754825]Kurds have less sexist military than first world countries now. U.S doesn't let women into combat.[/QUOTE] kinda like israel, they don't really have a choice they need numbers
-snip late-
[QUOTE=mdeceiver79;45756654]There are female atheletes better than every user on facepunch. There are more accurate snipers, there are women with more resolve and courage than you or I. It should be a meritocracy. To tell someone "you are worse" than others with no hope of actually proving themselves is as bad as racism.[/QUOTE] This. While [I]on average[/I] women are physically weaker than men there certainly are women who can meet the physical standards required in the military. If they can make the cut they should be allowed in.
[QUOTE=download;45756786]If they can make the cut they should be allowed in.[/QUOTE] They are
ISIS believes in cooties?
[QUOTE=RichyZ;45756870]correct me if im wrong but most western nations dont let women into combat roles even if they make the cut[/QUOTE] Yea. At the moment the only ones I can think of off the top of my head are New Zealand and Canada. Australia is allowing it next year I believe.
[QUOTE=download;45756898]Yea. At the moment the only ones I can think of off the top of my head are New Zealand and Canada. Australia is allowing it next year I believe.[/QUOTE] In my country women are exempt from emergency conscription, but we have women in service (in combat roles)
I asked a friend of mine who's keen about the whole ISIS situation, and he said that "Every single IS account I have asked on twitter has denied that being killed by a women means no heaven", "So I think it's just propoganda to make them look stupid". Then "Or the twitter accounts are embarrased".
terrible post, snip
[QUOTE=mdeceiver79;45756654]There are female atheletes better than every user on facepunch. There are more accurate snipers, there are women with more resolve and courage than you or I. It should be a meritocracy. To tell someone "you are worse" than others with no hope of actually proving themselves is as bad as racism.[/QUOTE] Yet in reality the admission standards for the KSK are lower for women then they are for men. I wonder why?
[QUOTE=RichyZ;45756870]correct me if im wrong but most western nations dont let women into combat roles even if they make the cut[/QUOTE] Denmark allow women in active combat roles as well, it's just that not many actually chooses to serve in the branches that are actively engaged in combat. That's why we've "only" lost a single woman in our 13 years in Afghanistan.
[QUOTE=trotskygrad;45757555]Yet in reality the admission standards for the KSK are lower for women then they are for men. I wonder why?[/QUOTE] 3 things. Source? Your point? Everything I said was true unless there is some Olympic athelete lurking round facepunch.
I think Canada was one of the first Western nations to allow women in combat roles. I know my mom got all the same combat training my dad did when they were both in in the '80s.
[QUOTE=RichyZ;45756870]correct me if im wrong but most western nations dont let women into combat roles even if they make the cut[/QUOTE] Pretty much every NATO member except for America does
[QUOTE=theevilldeadII;45755829]good idea but is'nt there a loop saying they can still go to heaven in something like this or is this like unlike pork where you can nevvvvvver be killed by a woman.[/QUOTE] I don't follow..? Are you trying to say if you're forced to be killed by a women it won't count..?
[QUOTE=abcpea;45755824]kurds are muslim, too[/QUOTE] not these ones though PKK and PJAK are apoist which is basically kurdish maoism, they act independently from the KRG peshmergas iirc
Never stopped the USSR women back in WWII, shouldn't stop any women ever.
[QUOTE=Birdman101;45755121]so why dont our troops just carry super soakers filled with pig blood?[/QUOTE] Allah would forgive them. It wouldn't be willful ingestion.
That's pretty good. Stir some religious shit up for the seemingly backwards and idiotic Islamic State fighters.
[QUOTE=PrusseLusken;45756638]how about you realize women in combat isn't about sexism it's about the fact that they'll never be equal to men in combat situations[/QUOTE] You have to be in damn fine shape to fight as a man too, and iirc a higher percentage of men are obese in the US. Does that play into your loaded blanket statement too? If you're judging women's ability to fight and shit based on average body diversity you're a dumby, because people in combat don't have average bodies.
[QUOTE=Laserbeams;45757452]This would make a fucking awesome TV show, or better yet, an anime[/QUOTE] hmm
[QUOTE=Riller;45756548]Up until WWI, it was required for British soldiers to keep a well-groomed mustache. Which is silly. Why would you no longer need a well-groomed mustache by WWI? Surely, now it's [I]world[/I] war, you'd need mustaches now more than ever![/QUOTE] Now those mustaches just make them looks like German Porn stars.
[QUOTE=PrusseLusken;45756638]how about you realize women in combat isn't about sexism it's about the fact that they'll never be equal to men in combat situations[/QUOTE] Sorry ass clown, I've experienced Basic Training and I've met women who could PT circles your fat neckbeard ass all day, not to mention half the men that were in my company as well. Women are just as capable as men in physical terms. In fact the female body is capable of taking more physical punishment than a males body, otherwise the pain of child birth would actually be intense enough to kill them. The only sexist thing I would ask for women to be in combat roles is that they have to have shaved heads like men do, I may be biased though as we dealt with a massive lice outbreak while I was there and the females happened to be the problem group with that. [editline]21st August 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;45756160] On the other hand, the US isn't in an almost total-war scenario that threatens its very existence.[/QUOTE] True, I'd wager this is similar to how the U.S. allowed Black recruits in WWII because of the total-war scenario, right down to the segregated units. It's sad that it takes the threat of total annihilation to make a civilization re-think backwards policies such as these.
[QUOTE=draugur;45754825]Kurds have less sexist military than first world countries now. U.S doesn't let women into combat.[/QUOTE] Besides what Trunk Monkay said, you have to realize that if you sent Female Combatants against ISIS, they'd do a lot worse than record them being beheaded. There was an article written by a female servicewoman who stated that the United States is not prepared to hear news about a female soldier being raped and gutted by enemy combatants, as real as it is.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.