[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23896676]Well yes, it is our [B]reason[/B] for invading those places, but its not been trumped up [I]for[/I] those invasions.
I'd like to see you not shed a tear if the largest building in Tehran was destroyed by a plane purposely crashing into it.[/QUOTE]
I think shedding a tear and shedding lots of blood are different things.
Hey Iran! STICK IT UP YOUR ASS.
USA did 9/11 :bees:
I know a 9/11 truther, actually. Makes me laugh.
He is right about this.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23899912]Didn't Iraq only spend 1-5% of their spending on actual military before the US invasion, compared to the US spending a hundred times as much?[/QUOTE]
It depends on what invasion you are referring to. But I beleave it to be a good amount higher than that due to the Iraq Iran war.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23899912]Didn't Iraq only spend 1-5% of their spending on actual military before the US invasion, compared to the US spending a hundred times as much?[/QUOTE]
The US spent 100-500% of their spending on the military?
[QUOTE=BusterBluth;23904155]It depends on what invasion you are referring to. But I beleave it to be a good amount higher than that due to the Iraq Iran war.[/QUOTE]
I meant the second one.
[QUOTE=Ridge;23909135]The US spent 100-500% of their spending on the military?[/QUOTE]
That was an exaggeration.
[QUOTE=JDK721;23900849]already debunked your argument in the other thread yet you continue to post the same nonsense
fuck off[/QUOTE]
You debunked the DOD? I'm sure they'd be interested in knowing that....
[editline]10:12PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23909150]That was an exaggeration.[/QUOTE]
According to [URL="http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=wb-wdi&met=ms_mil_xpnd_gd_zs&idim=country:USA&dl=en&hl=en&q=US+military+spending"]this graph[/URL], the US government gives 4.16% of it's spending to the military. Up from 3.81% in 2003.
[QUOTE=DrBreen;23896671]i do believe something like this happened, after all, the Rothschild's knew all about it[/QUOTE]
Name a conspiracy theory and someone is bound to think the Rothschild's are involved.
[QUOTE=Ridge;23909175]
According to [URL="http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=wb-wdi&met=ms_mil_xpnd_gd_zs&idim=country:USA&dl=en&hl=en&q=US+military+spending"]this graph[/URL], the US government gives 4.16% of it's spending to the military. Up from 3.81% in 2003.[/QUOTE]
According to [URL=http://www.facepunch.com/showpost.php?p=23909150&postcount=68]this post[/url], it was an exaggeration.
[QUOTE=Ridge;23909175]According to [URL="http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=wb-wdi&met=ms_mil_xpnd_gd_zs&idim=country:USA&dl=en&hl=en&q=US+military+spending"]this graph[/URL], the US government gives 4.16% of it's spending to the military. Up from 3.81% in 2003.[/QUOTE]
That's GDP bro. Check the budget percentage.
[img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7a/U.S._Federal_Spending_-_FY_2007.png[/img_thumb]
[QUOTE=Mexican;23909336]That's GDP bro. Check the budget percentage.
[img_thumb][URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7a/U.S._Federal_Spending_-_FY_2007.png[/URL][/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
Thank you, sir.
23%
Includes things like tanks, APCs, jet planes, floating cities, etc. Iraq had a conscript army, a bunch of 30 year old Soviet-era tanks and a half dozen MiGs left over from the first war. Requires a lot less funding for that...
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f5/State_flag_of_Iran_1964-1980.svg/500px-State_flag_of_Iran_1964-1980.svg.png[/img]
I miss the 70's..
[QUOTE=Ridge;23909175]You debunked the DOD? I'm sure they'd be interested in knowing that....
[editline]10:12PM[/editline]
According to [URL="http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=wb-wdi&met=ms_mil_xpnd_gd_zs&idim=country:USA&dl=en&hl=en&q=US+military+spending"]this graph[/URL], the US government gives 4.16% of it's spending to the military. Up from 3.81% in 2003.[/QUOTE]
The DoD lied in order to get the invasion on. Why you don't see this is beyond me, it's blatantly written all over every report that isn't from the DoD, but you act like the DoD supersedes them for some unbeknown reason to us.
[editline]02:00AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Ridge;23910804]Thank you, sir.
23%
Includes things like tanks, APCs, jet planes, floating cities, etc. Iraq had a conscript army, a bunch of 30 year old Soviet-era tanks and a half dozen MiGs left over from the first war. Requires a lot less funding for that...[/QUOTE]
Ok, what you don't seem to get, again, is that the US's military funding is in the billions. It is literally hundreds of times bigger than iraqs or irans, or any other nations. Why?
23% of 3.5 TRILLION DOLLARS.
809,140,000,000. Yeah, that's hundreds of times the nearest budget of any enemy of the states.
Fucking christ.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;23912926]Ok, what you don't seem to get, again, is that the US's military funding is in the billions. It is literally hundreds of times bigger than iraqs or irans, or any other nations. Why?
23% of 3.5 TRILLION DOLLARS.
809,140,000,000. Yeah, that's hundreds of times the nearest budget of any enemy of the states.
Fucking christ.[/QUOTE]
I already mentioned.
We have a MUCH MUCH larger military, with more people and more expensive equipment to maintain than those countries.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
