• Repressed heterosexuals, rejoice! Texas bill requires funding of traditonal value centers
    232 replies, posted
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;29432198]Then don't live in the south? There's four homosexuals in my town, and nobody's bothered because they keep it pretty much to themself. That's the way it should be - it works.[/QUOTE] Right, because I have the necessary funds to uproot myself from my college, home, and family completely. By the way, I guarantee there's more than four. Maybe that's why you think there's only four, because people are too afraid to come out and "be like those four." You're a backwards thinking goober.
[QUOTE=ThatHippyMan;29432231]By the way, I guarantee there's more than four. [/QUOTE] Actually not. Not many people set off the gaydar here. [QUOTE=Sanius;29432225]Blacks should continue to be lynched -- it works. Jews should continue to be gassed -- it works. Women should continue to be raped -- it works.[/QUOTE] None of those three do work..
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;29432265]Actually not. Not many people set off the gaydar here. [/QUOTE] You are disgusting.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;29432220]nope. does your constitution not guarantee equality for all? a voice that says some are immoral and unequal has no place in the democracy that document creates.[/QUOTE] It does, but it also guarantees freedom of speech, which you apparently have a issue with
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;29432265]Actually not. Not many people set off the gaydar here.[/QUOTE] No one thought I was gay when I came out, either. Turns out, people just don't except the kid who works on motorcycles for fun to be gay.
[QUOTE=Broseph_;29432299]It does, but it also guarantees freedom of speech, which you apparently have a issue with[/QUOTE] freedom of speech is fine, you can be a bigot all you want apparently once that bigotry works its way into legislation it's time to stop
[QUOTE=Sanius;29432279]You are disgusting.[/QUOTE] I would say the same in return but you'd all automatically assume I'm saying it's because of your sexuality. So instead - I disagree with what you say but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;29432265]Actually not. Not many people set off the gaydar here.[/QUOTE] let's bang
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;29431854]I understand it completely. I'm not basing my statement on oppression, I'm basing it on fairness. [b]No wonder you're oppressed if you're being treated better by the government than any other person.[/b] See, if gays went about their lives as everyone else, keeping their relationships behind closed doors, not going on about how "everyone hates them" and wanting money from governments, people might be a little bit nicer about it. And before you mention it, yes, I think PDA of straight couples should be kept to a minimum too. But not illegal like. The "Hurr durr it's because of my sexuality" argument is overused and anybody using it should be shot.[/QUOTE] You probably think there should be a White Entertainment Channel and a NAAWP, too, don't you. It's only fair. Bolded:[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0[/media] I'm not even exaggerating. How the fuck is not being allowed to marry, not being allowed to have hospital visits, not being allowed to adopt, etc., being treated [i]better[/i]!? Yes, yes, because gays started it with complaining that people hate them. It totally wasn't the bigots that caused gay people to exclaim that they want tolerance. No siree, dem gays started it. THOSE TWO ARE KISSING! ARREST THEM!
[QUOTE=Zeke129;29432370]freedom of speech is fine, you can be a bigot all you want apparently once that bigotry works its way into legislation it's time to stop[/QUOTE] Except it hasn't since this only mandates that there shall be facilities promoting traditional values if there are facilities for LBGT activities which like it or not not socially accepted by a large part of the population, if it was truly bigoted it would have mandated a ban on all LBGT activities
[QUOTE=ThatHippyMan;29430006][img_thumb]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_33Kc2KRkhrc/TCdd02NDYsI/AAAAAAAAAiI/nOQsr5nXVkc/s1600/christianoppressionpieej4.png[/img_thumb] [editline]25th April 2011[/editline] Same basic concept.[/QUOTE] Whats the difference between "Nothing" and "Athiest" anyway
[QUOTE=Last or First;29432475]I'm not even exaggerating. How the fuck is not being allowed to marry, not being allowed to have hospital visits, not being allowed to adopt, etc., being treated [i]better[/i]!?[/QUOTE] That's all being stopped. And you get an extra government centre, so the same funding should be available to everyone who doesn't use it. [QUOTE=Zeke129;29432464]let's bang[/QUOTE] Any time for you Zeke. [QUOTE=thispieiscold;29432513]Whats the difference between "Nothing" and "Athiest" anyway[/QUOTE] "Nothing" implies no belief at all, Athiest implies the denial that a "supreme power" exists.
[QUOTE=thispieiscold;29432513]Whats the difference between "Nothing" and "Athiest" anyway[/QUOTE] The difference is that there are people who identify as atheists and people who prefer not to identify as anything.
[QUOTE=Sanius;29432543]The difference is that there are people who identify as atheists and people who prefer not to identify as anything.[/QUOTE] No... Athiest - People who have decent reason for not believing in god and openly state these Nothing - The actual majority. People who don't even give a fuck.
[QUOTE=Last or First;29432475]You probably think there should be a White Entertainment Channel and a NAAWP, too, don't you. It's only fair. Bolded:[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0[/media][/QUOTE] I don't know what the fuck you are rambling on about and I don't feel like watching a video when I'm not even defending my self here [QUOTE=Last or First;29432475]I'm not even exaggerating. How the fuck is not being allowed to marry, not being allowed to have hospital visits, not being allowed to adopt, etc., being treated [i]better[/i]!?[/QUOTE] Apparently the EU is a fascist religious shithole since gay marriage is only allowed in 5 member states compared to the 5 States plus the Federal District which allow gay marriage [QUOTE=Last or First;29432475]Yes, yes, because gays started it with complaining that people hate them. It totally wasn't the bigots that caused gay people to exclaim that they want tolerance. No siree, dem gays started it.[/QUOTE] I don't give a fuck [QUOTE=Last or First;29432475]THOSE TWO ARE KISSING! ARREST THEM![/QUOTE] No cop in Texas apart from some rural ass Sheriffs will even give a fuck considering the Largest City in the State of Texas has a openly gay Mayor
[QUOTE=David Cameron;29432589]No... Athiest - People who have decent reason for not believing in god and openly state these Nothing - The actual majority. People who don't even give a fuck.[/QUOTE] That makes absolutely no sense. You don't seem to know the definition of atheism nor do you know how to spell it.
[QUOTE=David Cameron;29432589]No... Athiest - People who have decent reason for not believing in god and openly state these Nothing - The actual majority. People who don't even give a fuck.[/QUOTE] So wouldn't that make "Nothing" Agnostic?
[QUOTE=ThatHippyMan;29431835]No one said you had to be educated to vote.[/QUOTE] Every thinking man will be voting for me. Unfortunately that isn't a majority.
[QUOTE=Sanius;29432614]That makes absolutely no sense. You don't seem to know the definition of atheism nor do you know how to spell it.[/QUOTE] Sorry bro I'm not from an English speaking country. Did I insult your faith or something? [img]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_uAC46P9bgEo/RfkniusunxI/AAAAAAAAAT4/hcR9vtN8RWU/s400/iaindildo.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=thispieiscold;29432687]So wouldn't that make "Nothing" Agnostic?[/QUOTE] Agnostic is the acceptance that there may be a deity but will not hold a belief of one until there is proof.
[QUOTE=Broseph_;29432481]Except it hasn't since this only mandates that there shall be facilities promoting traditional values if there are facilities for LBGT activities which like it or not not socially accepted by a large part of the population, if it was truly bigoted it would have mandated a ban on all LBGT activities[/QUOTE] "If there's a facility that helps kids with gender and sexuality issues learn to be alright with themselves, promotes tolerance of LGBT people, and helps stop discrimination, then there shall also be a facility telling the kids to be straight, that being LGBT is wrong and/or unnatural and/or leads to unhappiness, and that it's their fault if they're LGBT because it's a choice." I don't see what's not bigoted about that. [QUOTE=FlapadarV2;29432522]That's all being stopped. And you get an extra government centre, so the same funding should be available to everyone who doesn't use it.[/QUOTE] Oh no! They're eventually going to get equal treatment! That means they're being treated better. Why isn't there a NAAWP? Planned Parenthood spends more time and money on women! That's unfair. Us poor, oppressed, straight white males. [QUOTE=Sanius;29432543]The difference is that there are people who identify as atheists and people who prefer not to identify as anything.[/QUOTE] Another description: The people in the "nothing in particular" section just don't give a shit about religion. Aka apatheism.
[QUOTE=Last or First;29432771] I don't see what's not bigoted about that.[/QUOTE] How is that bigoted at all? What part of it seeks to humiliate and or harm LGBT people?
[QUOTE=Last or First;29432771]and that it's their fault if they're LGBT because it's a choice."[/QUOTE] Subconscious or not, it is a choice.
[QUOTE=David Cameron;29432874]How is that bigoted at all? What part of it seeks to humiliate and or harm LGBT people?[/QUOTE] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_values#Traditional_definitions[/url] I swear to god if you point to "progressive definitions" as 'evidence' that I'm wrong, I will slap you and make you sit in a corner with a dunce cap on. page 53 [url]http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/2008platform.pdf[/url] [editline]25th April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=FlapadarV2;29432902]Subconscious or not, it is a choice.[/QUOTE] By the same logic, is being straight a choice? Because I don't recall, at any point, just going, "Hey! I'm going to like girls now."
[QUOTE=FlapadarV2;29432902]Subconscious or not, it is a choice.[/QUOTE] You have just invalidated any argument you may have been attempting to make in previous posts.
[QUOTE=Last or First;29433049] By the same logic, is being straight a choice? Because I don't recall, at any point, just going, "Hey! I'm going to like girls now."[/QUOTE] No, normal children follow by example of what everyone else does and should be doing. These gay groups are reversing that. When they see their parents together, and other parents, couples etc that becomes what is normal and they [i]choose[/i] to follow suite and get a girlfriend.
[QUOTE=Last or First;29432771]"If there's a facility that helps kids with gender and sexuality issues learn to be alright with themselves, promotes tolerance of LGBT people, and helps stop discrimination, then there shall also be a facility telling the kids to be straight, that being LGBT is wrong and/or unnatural and/or leads to unhappiness, and that it's their fault if they're LGBT because it's a choice." I don't see what's not bigoted about that[/QUOTE] Nobody is forcing anyone to go to the facility that teaches traditional values, and what evidence do you have that they will be teaching that LBGT rights are the devil? From the sounds of it all they will be teaching is what responsibilities come with marriage and how to bring up kids in a proper way as dictated by Texas tradition, no where did it mandate that they be taught that ITS ALL ABOUT JEEZUS and that Homosexuality is evil, at best It'll de-Americanize these fucking out of state transplants and teach the insane Christians from the Dixie that their theological fascism has no place in Texas and that they should adjust accordingly, at worst it'll promote that traditional marriage is preferable to homosexual relationships [editline]25th April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Last or First;29433049][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_values#Traditional_definitions[/url] I swear to god if you point to "progressive definitions" as 'evidence' that I'm wrong, I will slap you and make you sit in a corner with a dunce cap on. page 53 [url]http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/2008platform.pdf[/url][/QUOTE] Oh wow, a platform prepared by some assholes in Washington D.C., do I need to remind you that despite being apart of the United States, Texas is a whole different landscape considering up until last year Texas' Legislature was quite nearly 51-49 split between Republicans and Democrats [QUOTE=Last or First;29433049]By the same logic, is being straight a choice? Because I don't recall, at any point, just going, "Hey! I'm going to like girls now."[/QUOTE] Being Straight is a choice, ever been to prison?
[QUOTE=thispieiscold;29432687]So wouldn't that make "Nothing" Agnostic?[/QUOTE] "Nothing" would be "nothing." (A)gnosticism isn't even a theistic belief.
[QUOTE=David Cameron;29433139]No, normal children follow by example of what everyone else does and should be doing. These gay groups are reversing that. When they see their parents together, and other parents, couples etc that becomes what is normal and they [i]choose[/i] to follow suite and get a girlfriend.[/QUOTE] Protip: Homosexuality occurs in nature and there are several theories as to why this happens. Observed behaviors have nothing to do with what make you attracted to a man or woman. [b]EDIT:[/b] Wait, even if it was a choice, what would be the issue? If a guy choses to like fat women, should we invalidate his preferences, as well?
[QUOTE=David Cameron;29433139]No, normal children follow by example of what everyone else does and should be doing. These gay groups are reversing that. When they see their parents together, and other parents, couples etc that becomes what is normal and they [i]choose[/i] to follow suite and get a girlfriend.[/QUOTE] So, people just get attracted to others, not because of any inherent biological attributes that make it instinctual to want to get it on with the other sex (which just so happens to be crucial to continued existence of the species, and the species with no incentive to procreate don't reproduce), and because biological attributes can get mutated / changed in individuals, but because one male just started fucking chicks for no reason, and everyone else has been in some long chain of, "Eh, everyone else is doing it, might as well"? Wow, I never knew.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.