Rush Limbaugh - "No Aid For Haiti"? - Polidicks

an insanely rich republican who has never known anything but an extremely comfortable and secure lifestyle doesn't support helping disaster victims?? wow amazing, who woulda thought

I feel really bad for Haiti, and I'm glad to see people work together, but why is it bad that someone doesn't want to help them? [editline]02:31AM[/editline] Well, spend his own money to help them anyway

Just don't donate through the government. I don't care how you rate me, but do YOU trust the US Government right now with anything?

[QUOTE=Glaber;19679306]Just don't donate through the government. I don't care how you rate me, but do YOU trust the US Government right now with anything?[/QUOTE] yes

Republicans are nazis

[QUOTE=Trotsky;19681381][QUOTE=Glaber;19679306]Just don't donate through the government. I don't care how you rate me, but do YOU trust the US Government right now with anything?[/QUOTE] yes[/QUOTE] You naive fool. You can't possibly expect them to spend your money in a useful way, after all the useless crap they've tossed our hard earned tax dollars on?

[QUOTE=Alan Ninja!;19684651]You naive fool. You can't possibly expect them to spend your money in a useful way, after all the useless crap they've tossed our hard earned tax dollars on?[/QUOTE] by... using a stimulus package, which is something that works? protetc our taxs repeal nanny socialsim like the police and fire bridages mccain/palin 2012

You are most definitely a dumbass. Who cannot spell. Let's see where you're wonderful stimulus has gotten us since February '08: [img]http://michaelscomments.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/jobs-lost-october-09.gif?w=460&h=270[/img] Now, the first government bailout was the Emergency Economic Stabilization act of 2008: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Economic_Stabilization_Act_of_2008#Paulson_proposal[/url] It began October of '08. As you look act the graph, job numbers decrease more rapidly. But that's not all. In February of '09, we got TARP. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TARP#Expenditures_and_commitments[/url] Job numbers are bumped slightly, then continue to drop. So we have dramatically fewer jobs now than before. As for nanny socialism, you are still very much a dumbass. Nobody has suggested doing away with necessary things like police departments, and anyone who does is also a dumbass. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Flaming" - TH89))[/highlight]

How do falling job numbers relate to stimulus? The second they rise back up you're going to say that had nothing to do with the government and that it was good old American business.

[QUOTE=Alan Ninja!;19691105]You are most definitely a dumbass. Who cannot spell. Now, the first government bailout was the Emergency Economic Stabilization act of 2008: [URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Economic_Stabilization_Act_of_2008#Paulson_proposal[/URL] It began October of '08. As you look act the graph, job numbers decrease more rapidly. But that's not all. [/QUOTE] FYI that was under Bush but I don't remember anyone calling the Bush Administration socialist

I'm wondering, had the disaster struck the Dominican Republic rather than Haiti, would Rush Limbaugh have been humming a different tune? After all, it had been helping him get his rocket off the launch pad. [url]http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/06/27/national/main1753947.shtml[/url]

[QUOTE=Sigma-Lambda;19692177]FYI that was under Bush but I don't remember anyone calling the Bush Administration socialist[/QUOTE] Not after 2009. and plenty of people were opposed to the original bailout.

[QUOTE=Alan Ninja!;19691105]You are most definitely a dumbass. Who cannot spell. Let's see where you're wonderful stimulus has gotten us since February '08: [img]http://michaelscomments.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/jobs-lost-october-09.gif?w=460&h=270[/img][/quote] jooooobssss yay also, that has nothing to do with what we're on about, Jedediah [quote]Now, the first government bailout was the Emergency Economic Stabilization act of 2008: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Economic_Stabilization_Act_of_2008#Paulson_proposal[/url] It began October of '08. As you look act the graph, job numbers decrease more rapidly. But that's not all. [/quote] under bush [quote]In February of '09, we got TARP. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TARP#Expenditures_and_commitments[/url] Job numbers are bumped slightly, then continue to drop. So we have dramatically fewer jobs now than before.[/quote] um... jobs? That's a cool topic we can talk about, but you know.. that kind of doesn't relate to the stimulus. [quote]As for nanny socialism, you are still very much a dumbass. Nobody has suggested doing away with necessary things like police departments, and anyone who does is also a dumbass.[/QUOTE] hey, when you attack the government and say superficial shit, I can't help but assume your own fault, broseph You like the word dumbass, don't you. why not work on something else like tool, or donkey fucker [editline]01:19AM[/editline] also, I was being facetious with the misspelling. [editline]01:20AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Alan Ninja!;19692330]Not after 2009. and plenty of people were opposed to the original bailout.[/QUOTE] where were you then

[QUOTE=Trotsky;19692454]where were you then[/QUOTE] saying "you should support the president even if you disagree with his policies" no doubt just like rush was :smile:

I don't pay attention to hypocritical bigots. It's still pretty messed up though.

Rush Limbaugh could feed a starving family for a month Maybe more with ketchup

[QUOTE=Trotsky;19692454]jum... jobs? That's a cool topic we can talk about, but you know.. that kind of doesn't relate to the stimulus. [/QUOTE] The White House would disagree: [url]http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/30/news/economy/Stimulus_jobs_created/index.htm?postversion=2009103007[/url]

it's going to take more then 640,000 jobs to stimulate demand when we have millions jobless that outweigh this small increase in demand.

It's a side effect you silly goose good job reading int it

fuck rush limbaugh why do people still listen to him same with glenn beck :sigh:

Is there something that denotes that when you are rich you are obligated to donate to everything?

[QUOTE=DeepDish;19714226]fuck rush limbaugh why do people still listen to him same with glenn beck :sigh:[/QUOTE] Because people share the same viewpoints,Have a poor selection of things to watch on TV/ Litsen on the radio, they want to, etc. Take your pick. They're all valid.