OHIO: Eight Horses Burned To Death In Anti-Gay Arson Attack - Polidicks

To you people in Ohio: don't feel so bad. We had a string of corrupt governors here in Illinois. :eng99:

[QUOTE=The Maestro;29467322]Godammit Ohio, I don't want to live here anymore.[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.nataliedee.com/052005/ohio.jpg[/img]

Hilarious

[QUOTE=Diomedes;29479432]Only an ignorant bigot fascist homophobic racist would say something like that! And other words of which I don't understand the origins![/QUOTE] And there's the Troll Signal. Move along, folks. Nothing to see here anymore. Side note: I wonder what homophobes think will come of actions like this? When was the last time someone did something like this and anything positive happened for [i]either side[/i]?

[QUOTE=Diomedes;29479318]The guy trying to show off his knowledge of dictionaries ends his sentences with prepositions, IRONY LOL!!!!11[/QUOTE] First you claim people are misusing the word bigot, and it turns out they were using it right. Then you try and claim the the definition that proved you wrong was from some shoddy, third-rate dictionary, and it turns out it was from Merriam-Webster. Then you try change the subject with a irrelevant remark about ending a sentence with a preposition: [url]http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/page/153[/url] It just isn't your day, is it?

[QUOTE=Dalndox;29481522]Side note: I wonder what homophobes think will come of actions like this? When was the last time someone did something like this and anything positive happened for [i]either side[/i]?[/QUOTE] What is a "homophobe"? "Homophobe," following the conventions which apply to all phobias, must come from the Greek "homoios," meaning "same," and "phobia," meaning "irrational fear." So I conclude that it must mean "the irrational fear of being the same." Of course, like all leftist buzzwords, it actually doesn't reflect any tangible meaning. It sure as hell isn't a legitimate phobia, because phobias by their very definition are physically repellant to the stimuli with which they correspond. In short, someone who has a phobia of homosexuals would be psychologically inclined to flee as far away from them as possible, the way I flee from a spider when I see one because I am arachnophobic. You sure as hell would not ever do anything to anger the stimuli (in this case homosexuals), the way I would never want to do anything to aggravate a spider, because that would violate the entire established psychological concept of a "phobia." The term "homophobia" has no rational meaning whatsoever. All it attempts to convey is a dislike for homosexuals, while there are no commonly-circulated phrases yet for someone who would have the same attitude towards paedophiles (why are they not paedophobes?) or bestialists (why are they not bestiophobes?). That's because it's still perfectly fine to hate paedophiles or bestialists, so we don't need to make up a word that we can use to attach inherent negative connotations to those who do. I mean if we just say "people who don't like queers" that doesn't sound very negative. So instead of just being accurate, let's make up a whole new branch of political correctness and come up with a word for it so it's much easier to straw-man, and people who hear that word will react like Pavlov's fuckin' dogs. [QUOTE=Mingebox;29483382]First you claim people are misusing the word bigot, and it turns out they were using it right. Then you try and claim the the definition that proved you wrong was from some shoddy, third-rate dictionary, and it turns out it was from Merriam-Webster. Then you try change the subject with a irrelevant remark about ending a sentence with a preposition: [url]http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/page/153[/url] It just isn't your day, is it?[/QUOTE] If you think it isn't my day you just don't share the same concept of entertainment as I.

[QUOTE=Diomedes;29483469]What is a "homophobe"? "Homophobe," following the conventions which apply to all phobias, must come from the Greek "homoios," meaning "same," and "phobia," meaning "irrational fear." So I conclude that it must mean "the irrational fear of being the same." Of course, like all leftist buzzwords, it actually doesn't reflect any tangible meaning. It sure as hell isn't a legitimate phobia, because phobias by their very definition are physically repellant to the stimuli with which they correspond. In short, someone who has a phobia of homosexuals would be psychologically inclined to flee as far away from them as possible, the way I flee from a spider when I see one because I am arachnophobic. You sure as hell would not ever do anything to anger the stimuli (in this case homosexuals), the way I would never want to do anything to aggravate a spider, because that would violate the entire established psychological concept of a "phobia." The term "homophobia" has no rational meaning whatsoever. All it attempts to convey is a dislike for homosexuals, while there are no commonly-circulated phrases yet for someone who would have the same attitude towards paedophiles (why are they not paedophobes?) or bestialists (why are they not bestiophobes?). That's because it's still perfectly fine to hate paedophiles or bestialists, so we don't need to make up a word that we can use to attach inherent negative connotations to those who do. I mean if we just say "people who don't like queers" that doesn't sound very negative. So instead of just being accurate, let's make up a whole new branch of political correctness and come up with a word for it so it's much easier to straw-man, and people who hear that word will react like Pavlov's fuckin' dogs.[/QUOTE] A phobia is an irrational fear or hatred of something, homo is a shortening of homosexual, it's just contracted. Pedophiles and zoophiles are persecuted is because animals and children can't give consent, meaning exersizing either of those is always rape, so they're hardly comparable and it's pretty offensive that you would.

God dammit i hate gay horses, we have hundreds of them in jersey

[QUOTE=Nerts;29485613]A phobia is an irrational fear or hatred of something, homo is a shortening of homosexual, it's just contracted. Pedophiles and zoophiles are persecuted is because animals and children can't give consent, meaning exersizing either of those is always rape, so they're hardly comparable and it's pretty offensive that you would.[/QUOTE] That's misinformation, phobias have absolutely nothing to do with hate. "Phobia" means in Greek literally "irrational fear." Arachnophobes don't hate spiders, they're just intensely afraid of their presence. Firstly, you're actually wrong, both children and animals can give consent. They just can't give informed consent, but on the other hand neither can the mentally retarded or a cucumber and yet having sex with a consenting retard or a garden vegetable is legal. Animals can certainly consent, it's very easy to tell if an animal wants something or not. Second, paedophilia is not the act of bangin' kiddies, it just means that you are only sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children whether you act on it or not. Yet no one (including myself) defends paedophiles and no one would call you a "paedophobe" for declaring animosity towards them. Likewise, zoophiles are sexually attracted to animals, one does not have to commit an act of first degree goat-fuckery to qualify as a zoophile, but society has zero problem hating them (and neither do I). The point is, "homophobia" is a retarded-ass word that attempts to convey an idea that is rationally implausible. Trying to make it sound like everyone who has a problem with queers is just "afraid" of them makes you look like an idiot and does nothing to address actual social problems. The plain fact is that no one has a "phobia" of homosexuals, if they legitimately did then they wouldn't be out lighting their animals on fire, they would be cowering under their bed rocking back and forth trying desperately to suppress mental images of dicks in hairy butt holes.

[QUOTE=Diomedes;29489970]That's misinformation, phobias have absolutely nothing to do with hate. "Phobia" means in Greek literally "irrational fear." Arachnophobes don't hate spiders, they're just intensely afraid of their presence. [/QUOTE] A phobia is a strong fear of or antipathy (aversion) to something. Hate isn't the right word but it means basically the same thing.

English is a fluid language, homophobe is the accepted term for someone prejudiced against LGBT persons.

dang homo poniesss

[QUOTE=Diomedes;29489970]That's misinformation, phobias have absolutely nothing to do with hate. "Phobia" means in Greek literally "irrational fear." Arachnophobes don't hate spiders, they're just intensely afraid of their presence. Firstly, you're actually wrong, both children and animals can give consent. They just can't give informed consent, but on the other hand neither can the mentally retarded or a cucumber and yet having sex with a consenting retard or a garden vegetable is legal. Animals can certainly consent, it's very easy to tell if an animal wants something or not. Second, paedophilia is not the act of bangin' kiddies, it just means that you are only sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children whether you act on it or not. Yet no one (including myself) defends paedophiles and no one would call you a "paedophobe" for declaring animosity towards them. Likewise, zoophiles are sexually attracted to animals, one does not have to commit an act of first degree goat-fuckery to qualify as a zoophile, but society has zero problem hating them (and neither do I). The point is, "homophobia" is a retarded-ass word that attempts to convey an idea that is rationally implausible. Trying to make it sound like everyone who has a problem with queers is just "afraid" of them makes you look like an idiot and does nothing to address actual social problems. The plain fact is that no one has a "phobia" of homosexuals, if they legitimately did then they wouldn't be out lighting their animals on fire, they would be cowering under their bed rocking back and forth trying desperately to suppress mental images of dicks in hairy butt holes.[/QUOTE] We're talking english, not Greek, the meaning of the word isn't the same as it used to be. I pointed out that those were only bad where you act on them, "exersizing either of those is always rape", and uninformed consent is not consent to me. Homophobe is the best phrase in common use for people like this guy that doesn't involve swearing, he's acting irrationally out of fear/hatred.

[QUOTE=Diomedes;29489970]Firstly, you're actually wrong, both children and animals can give consent. [b]They just can't give informed consent[/b], but on the other hand neither can the mentally retarded or a cucumber and yet having sex with a consenting retard or a garden vegetable is legal. Animals can certainly consent, it's very easy to tell if an animal wants something or not.[/QUOTE] Legally speaking, that is not consent. If they can't give informed consent, it's not legal to fuck them. That's the same reason that having sex with a drunk person is considered rape.

[QUOTE=Prismatex;29490251]Legally speaking, that is not consent. If they can't give informed consent, it's not legal to fuck them. That's the same reason that having sex with a drunk person is considered rape.[/QUOTE] This is what I was trying to say, but worded better.

Not my little ponies :(

[QUOTE=CG-105;29479410]Damnit Ohio, stop making be embarrassed to live in you.[/QUOTE] The city regions aren't so bad! They are the only things keeping us from being a constant Red state though...

lol @ people are so quick to assume the attack was on the gay human

[QUOTE=pognivet;29490693]lol @ people are so quick to assume the attack was on the gay human[/QUOTE] What?

[QUOTE=pognivet;29490693]lol @ people are so quick to assume the attack was on the gay human[/QUOTE] I heard the horses were trade unionists

[QUOTE=Diomedes;29489970]Second, paedophilia is not the act of bangin' kiddies, it just means that you are only sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children whether you act on it or not. Yet no one (including myself) defends paedophiles and no one would call you a "paedophobe" for declaring animosity towards them.[/QUOTE] uh actually a lot of people here would defend people who are attracted to children but do not act on it, myself included [editline]28th April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=pognivet;29490693]lol @ people are so quick to assume the attack was on the gay human[/QUOTE] lol @ people who cannot read: [quote]The words "Fags are freaks" were found spray-painted on the side of the barn. [/quote]

[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;29491157]uh actually a lot of people here would defend people who are attracted to children but do not act on it, myself included [editline]28th April 2011[/editline] lol @ people who cannot read:[/QUOTE] uh how do you know they didnt burn the horses because they were queer. aside from the barn (property of the horses) and the horses themselves nothing else was damaged. the human queer's property was left unscathed. it's entirely possible he did it himself in order to frame hardworking americans as part of the gay agenda. call me paranoid but something just doesn't seem right here. [highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("What? Still shitposting or something, last chance blown" - Dragon))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;29491157]uh actually a lot of people here would defend people who are attracted to children but do not act on it, myself included [editline]28th April 2011[/editline] lol @ people who cannot read:[/QUOTE] You missed the joke so much it could have stolen your wallet.

[QUOTE=pognivet;29491417]uh how do you know they didnt burn the horses because they were queer. aside from the barn (property of the horses) and the horses themselves nothing else was damaged. the human queer's property was left unscathed. it's entirely possible he did it himself in order to frame hardworking americans as part of the gay agenda. call me paranoid but something just doesn't seem right here.[/QUOTE] Are you joking?

[QUOTE=Megafanx13;29491461]Are you joking?[/QUOTE] No, he's trolling.

[QUOTE=Megafanx13;29491461]Are you joking?[/QUOTE] Are you implying that you consider what he says to be a serious statement, rather than a satirical comment about attacking gay horses? Because we all know that gay horses are a major problem to be addressed in this country.

"I don't want to live on this planet anymore"

[QUOTE=Nerts;29491503]No, he's trolling.[/QUOTE] Well, alright then.

[QUOTE=pognivet;29491417]uh how do you know they didnt burn the horses because they were queer. aside from the barn (property of the horses) and the horses themselves nothing else was damaged. the human queer's property was left unscathed. it's entirely possible he did it himself in order to frame hardworking americans as part of the gay agenda. call me paranoid but something just doesn't seem right here.[/QUOTE] :silent: Okay yeah you're paranoid.