• 'Finding Nemo 2' in development with director Andrew Stanton
    146 replies, posted
Next thing you know there'll be a Wall-E 2
They're going to fail big time.
[QUOTE=squids_eye;36831134][img]http://www.movie-pix.com/Shark-Tale-Oscar.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] Fuck, I remember that movie.
[QUOTE=RockmanYoshi;36832039]Fuck, I remember that movie.[/QUOTE] It was shit.
I liked it at the time
Finding Nemo 2 Nemo grows up and becomes a bounty hunter, and his next objective is finding Captain Nemo and the Nautilus. ofc.
[QUOTE=CakeMaster7;36828325]Wait, Taken is getting a sequel? I loved that movie, it didn't need a fucking sequel[/QUOTE] What are you talking about, it was rife with sequel opportunity Taken 2: Liam Neeson Kills The Entire Population Of <insert non-France nation here>
Bugs life 2 please :(
I bet it's named "Finding Nemo 2" just to make people interested and it's really going be a romantic comedy between Nemo and some bitch-fish. Or something.
[QUOTE=OvB;36814252]It seems like it could be either: 1. Nemo get's lost again, dad has to find him again. 2. Nemo grows up, has a kid, has to find him.[/QUOTE] Nemo the II, hence finding nemo II?
The bitch-fish and Nemo have a huge argument and Nemo gets thrown out. He starts drinking heavily and just disappears. The bitch-fish searches for him, with hilarious side-kick characters and crazy events taking place. Then, in the end, Nemo is found dead, choked from his own vomit because he passed out and threw up while unconscious. I think I figured it out!
Finding Nemo 2 takes on a deeper, psychological theme this time around. To appeal to age of the generation the first was targeted at, "Nemo 2" takes an avant garde approach, featuring only one character (Nemo himself). The film runs for twenty-three hours, and revolves around Nemo "finding himself". The dialogue is composed entirely of couplets, every now and then breaking down syllables incorrectly and "out of tune" to sub-consciously represent when Nemo has come to an incorrect conclusion. The music is minimalist, composed entirely on a single Trimba in one continuous performance. To maintain theme, the music constantly changes time signatures, never once utilizing a traditional time signature. Due to the length of the film, the musician had to compose the piece while in the bathroom with much food on hand. The audio is completely unedited, leaving in every resulting sound to ensure artistic integrity. [editline]July 19th, 2012[/editline] I don't remember writing this, what the hell. I was up all night last night thanks to my annual curse where I'm unable to sleep for one night in July (it's fucking spooky but this is the third year in a row), I must've wrote this really early this morning in some weird sleepless trance. My goodness.
All of Pixar's movies in the past have taken you on massive trips through your imagination, they have been so creative. Recently though, we have Cars 2 and Brave. I have never seen Cars 2, but I was really disappointed with Brave, it basically was How to train your [sp]Mother/Bear[/sp], filled with tropes. Pixar said that they would never do a sequel unless they could write a better story than the original. I think this is the beginning of the end.
[QUOTE=CakeMaster7;36828325]Wait, Taken is getting a sequel? I loved that movie, it didn't need a fucking sequel[/QUOTE] He killed that many people, it makes sense they would want revenge.
[QUOTE=Sgt. Lulz;36835124]Finding Nemo 2 Nemo grows up and becomes a bounty hunter, and his next objective is finding Captain Nemo and the Nautilus. ofc.[/QUOTE]1,000 Leagues Under Sydney.
Also guys, do you remember what everyone thought Toy Story 2 was going to be like? That was supposed to be horrible... and it wasn't. I still hold hope. [sp]Not really, it's going to be shit.[/sp] EDIT: Also, neither Cars 2 or Brave had John Lasseter, Brad Bird, or Andrew Stanton involved in them, and all the others did. Coincidence? This has at least got Stanton so hey. Can't be too awful.
I'm only interested if Ellen Degeneres is going to be in it again.
The influx of sequels from Pixar is largely in part to Pixar being one of the largest holder/creator of franchises for Disney. Almost all of the successful Disney movies, excluding Pirates of the carribean, have come from Pixar and the ticket, DVD and merchandise sales from those movies is huge. With that comes Disney relying on Pixar to make a lot of money and do it with minimal risk, and that means sequels that are easy to merchandise. Pixar still makes amazing works of art visually but I have a feeling the quality of their movies as a whole and new IPs is going to be a thing of the past.
This doesn't make me angry. Just sad.
[QUOTE=Mrglitch2000;36821417]I don't know about anyone else, but I want to see more of those little animation shorts that Pixar made for certain films. Kind of like this one: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agmDxXIZHNY[/media][/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t50/Kitterwings/e8975667e23b2701d79fe07f31a42365.png[/IMG] woah what's going on here
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.