Unemployment at 7.9% - still not under Bush level

[RoadOfGirl]

funfact: ronald reagan was a racist nazi

[SigmaLambda]

[QUOTE=UziXxX;39442808]So just because I brought up a previous president means I'm blaming Barack Obama?

I don't follow your logic. Please explain to me.[/QUOTE]

It's because the comparison is totally arbitrary and meaningless.

[editline]1st February 2013[/editline]

[QUOTE=RoadOfGirl;39443400]funfact: ronald reagan was a racist nazi[/QUOTE]

his full name was literally "Ronald Goatfucker Reagan" you can look it up

[editline]1st February 2013[/editline]

Ok, ok ok ok. [b]I AM GOING TO MAKE THIS REALLY SIMPLE[/b]

[QUOTE=UziXxX;39443371]I like how when unemployment was 7.8% under bush everyone blames him and is outraged.[/QUOTE]

Because he caused it.

[QUOTE=UziXxX;39443371]Then when unemployment is 7.9%, everyone thinks things are fine.[/QUOTE]

Because it takes more than four years to fix the global economy, especially when two of which were spent with an obstructionist congress.

[Kube]

[QUOTE=redhaven;39443280]Children, this is why deficit spending is bad.

Don't vote for Republican again.[/QUOTE]

Because Democrats haven't raised it before in the past at all.

[POLOPOZOZO]

[QUOTE=UziXxX;39443371]I like how when unemployment was 7.8% under bush everyone blames him and is outraged.

Then when unemployment is 7.9%, everyone thinks things are fine.[/QUOTE]

Reality is a four year bubble in which trends don't exist

[Glaber]

[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;39443461]
Because he caused it.[/QUOTE]

And Snowball ruined all the milk on the farm. Unless you have something to back that up, your claims make as much sense as Animal Farm.

[Billiam]

[QUOTE=UziXxX;39442601]What relevance does this have what so ever to do with this thread?[/QUOTE]

How about you stop dancing around people's statements and acknowledge the context around these numbers?

[laserguided]

[QUOTE=Billiam;39444528]How about you stop dancing around people's statements and acknowledge the context around these numbers?[/QUOTE]
for the same reason nobody else is acknowledging the fact that they're implying he said something he didn't and thus trying to rally support around one person for no apparent reason.

[Billiam]

[QUOTE=laserguided;39444546]for the same reason nobody else is acknowledging the fact that they're implying he said something he didn't and thus trying to rally support around one person for no apparent reason.[/QUOTE]

The fact that some posters made some assumptions doesn't invalidate the statements made by other posters.

That was a valid comparison, it doesn't need feigned naivety