RUMOR: Next Xbox 'to boast ridiculously powerful 16-core CPU'
228 replies, posted
[QUOTE=W00tbeer1;35510876]It'd end up costing $1000+
Definitely not.[/QUOTE]
It would go the way of the PS3, they would have to lose some serious money to ship nearly enough units, I don't think this is plausible just yet, maybe sometime in the future.
[QUOTE=J!NX;35510891]the point just went over your head...[/QUOTE]
I'm not taking this seriously anymore, none of you can actually make a good point. You call me kid, Protocol 7 talks about TECHNALOGOY all the time and Gameadict..well he's actually not bad.
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35510888]That's very cool and I'm proud of you for playing consoles. Have a gold star for being a good boy.[/QUOTE]
Are you going to contribute anything anymore or are you just going to continue to use passive aggressive ad hominem?
[QUOTE=Protocol7;35510885]You were the one going "Leave." and "Be quiet." Like you were authoritative or something[/QUOTE]
Because none of the points you make actually mean anything or show that you've read my posts. That's why lad.
[editline]10th April 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Protocol7;35510921]Are you going to contribute anything anymore or are you just going to continue to use passive aggressive ad hominem?[/QUOTE]
You make stupid posts and I will treat you like a stupid person. Those latin words won't save you.
16 cores clocked at 0.4 ghz
[QUOTE=Protocol7;35510921]Are you going to contribute anything anymore or are you just going to continue to use passive aggressive ad hominem?[/QUOTE]
maybe he can't think of any more arguments because he has none
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35510924]
You make stupid posts and I will treat you like a stupid person. Those latin words won't save you.[/QUOTE]
whoa hey shit he's turning into a man I think
whoa look the fuck out
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35510924]Because none of the points you make actually mean anything or show that you've read my posts. That's why lad.[/QUOTE]
Your first post is "Good god will you PC gamers stop complaining..."
If only you would heed your own advice and read the posts beforehand to understand that nobody was complaining about anything until you had to open your gob.
Matter of fact, we wouldn't be arguing anything if you didn't say anything.
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35510896]Your caps lock button is broken.[/QUOTE]
I remember when I went off topic in pointless arguments when I knew I was losing.
Being six years old was fun.
Lets end this:
PC Fanboys say "Consoles look shit"
Xbox Fanboys say "PCs look shit"
Elitists say "It's not like you're the master race or anything"
We say "Get back on topic"
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35510924]You make stupid posts and I will treat you like a stupid person. Those latin words won't save you.[/QUOTE]
"An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it. Ad hominem reasoning is normally described as a logical fallacy."
Your entire argument is a logical fallacy, if you'd like you could quote some posts where people were complaining about the (rumored) 16 core processor
[QUOTE=J!NX;35510891]the point just went over your head... and your arguments are nothing but jumbled insults as well[/QUOTE]
Well no, I was arguing with you then you started making stupid posts so I feel the need to do the same.
[QUOTE=farmatyr;35509203]I don't see what's so bad investing more in this field, it could prove to be quite useful in other future tech.[/QUOTE]
it blows ass as a gaming device, they should continue research on the kinect away from gaming
[QUOTE=Protocol7;35510985]"An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it. Ad hominem reasoning is normally described as a logical fallacy."
Your entire argument is a logical fallacy, if you'd like you could quote some posts where people were complaining about the (rumored) 16 core processor[/QUOTE]
Thanks for the wikipedia description. Did you really just bring up technology for a seventh time?
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35510991]Well no, I was arguing with you then you started making stupid posts so I feel the need to do the same.[/QUOTE]
Resist that need, and then there will be no more need.
Anyway, is there anything you'd like to get across about the 16 core Xbox rumour?
Also, the logical fallacy point: You're presuming that since we think PCs will outstrip the new rumoured Xbox in time anyway, we are automatically PC fanboys.
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35511004]Thanks for the wikipedia description. Did you really just bring up technology for a seventh time?[/QUOTE]
Yes I did because that's exactly why people were "complaining."
You can try to belittle me all you want, it just makes you look like an idiot.
The fact of the matter is the first page consisted of people ridiculing the rumor because the technology doesn't fit the needs of the device.
[QUOTE=Grabigel;35510947]I remember when I went off topic in pointless arguments when I knew I was losing.
Being six years old was fun.[/QUOTE]
No I've won lad but it appears one person cannot stop talking about technology which I wasn't even referring to and another feels the need to start making stupid posts so no, I never was losing. I also like how you never even made a point so you can stay quiet ;)
[editline]10th April 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Protocol7;35511035]Yes I did because that's exactly why people were "complaining."
You can try to belittle me all you want, it just makes you look like an idiot.[/QUOTE]
Oh right, I didn't notice that I was complaining about the technology...
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35511045]No I've won lad but it appears one person cannot stop talking about technology which I wasn't even referring to and another feels the need to start making stupid posts so no, I never was losing. I also like how you never even made a point so you can stay quiet ;)
[editline]10th April 2012[/editline]
Oh right, I didn't notice that I was complaining about the technology...[/QUOTE]
you know someone lost when they go
"LOL I WON BECAUSE X REASON"
[QUOTE=GameAdict;35511020]Resist that need, and then there will be no more need.
Anyway, is there anything you'd like to get across about the 16 core Xbox rumour?
Also, the logical fallacy point: You're presuming that since we think PCs will outstrip the new rumoured Xbox in time anyway, we are automatically PC fanboys.[/QUOTE]
Look addict, don't turn into these idiots who think I'm talking about technology lad. I'm on about the actual owners of these PCs who feel the need to come into these threads and wave their dicks around because their PC has a processor that the Xbox doesn't. PC's have a lot more technology, that's pretty cool but no-one wants to know that in every thread or discussion about a console because honestly, its really annoying.
[editline]10th April 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=J!NX;35511075]you know someone lost when they go
"LOL I WON BECAUSE X REASON"[/QUOTE]
Okay Jinx, you just make a post, that's pretty cool. Well done for typing out those words. From now on, I shall treat you and Protocol as toddlers.
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35511045]Oh right, I didn't notice that I was complaining about the technology...[/QUOTE]
You were complaining about people saying that 16 cores is overkill. The premise of the OP is that there's a rumor about the technology going into the Xbox. If you're going to pretend the OP doesn't exist so you can make a dig at "PC fanboys" then you're outright trolling.
[QUOTE=Protocol7;35511088]You were complaining about people saying that 16 cores is overkill. The premise of the OP is that there's a rumor about the technology going into the Xbox. If you're going to pretend the OP doesn't exist so you can make a dig at "PC fanboys" then you're outright trolling.[/QUOTE]
Okay, that's a good post and I'm pleased at your wording, if you could just read other people's posts then you would be able to make a post worth reading but it's okay, don't be sad, I know very well you tried and here's a silver star. Just work your way to a gold star now ;)
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35511112]Okay, that's a good post and I'm pleased at your wording, if you could just read other people's posts then you would be able to make a post worth reading but it's okay, don't be sad, I know very well you tried and here's a silver star. Just work your way to a gold star now ;)[/QUOTE]
Does anyone else see this? Completely ignores everything I said and again uses yet another ad hominem.
That, my friends, is a dead argument.
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35511112]Okay, that's a good post and I'm pleased at your wording, if you could just read other people's posts then you would be able to make a post worth reading but it's okay, don't be sad, I know very well you tried and here's a silver star. Just work your way to a gold star now ;)[/QUOTE]
Irrelevant to what we were discussing.
If you stopped constantly shooting these angry posts off, and agreed that this is not the place to discuss the matter, then most people wouldn't mind your attempt to get back on the thread tracks.
[QUOTE=Protocol7;35511159]Does anyone else see this? Completely ignores everything I said and again uses yet another ad hominem.
That, my friends, is a dead argument.[/QUOTE]
I was gonna call him a braindead retard but hey, that works too.
[QUOTE=Protocol7;35511159]Does anyone else see this? Completely ignores everything I said and again uses yet another ad hominem.
That, my friends, is a dead argument.[/QUOTE]
Okay, well this time, you used the same Latin wording as in your previous posts, not bad but would be pretty good to see some other Latin wording. Still a silver star though sad to say :(. Maybe next time.
[editline]10th April 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=GameAdict;35511171]Irrelevant to what we were discussing.
If you stopped constantly shooting these angry posts off, and agreed that this is not the place to discuss the matter, then most people wouldn't mind your attempt to get back on the thread tracks.[/QUOTE]
I can't take his posts seriously any more so I'll treat him like a child. I provided my arguments, received stupid banter and had enough. If no-one can provide an adequate point then I'm finished.
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35511188]Okay, well this time, you used the same Latin wording as in your previous posts, not bad but would be pretty good to see some other Latin wording. Still a silver star though sad to say :(. Maybe next time.[/QUOTE]
That "latin wording" is, as far as anyone who's educated is concerned, a logical fallacy that you keep using which is a big no-no in any argument.
You have no credibility. I probably don't either. But you're grasping at straws, good work.
[QUOTE=EzioAuditore;35511188]
I can't take his posts seriously any more so I'll treat him like a child.[/QUOTE]
How appropriate, you're acting like one.
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;35511176]I was gonna call him a braindead retard but hey, that works too.[/QUOTE]
A braindead person wouldn't be able to use a computer. Another stupid person.
[editline]10th April 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;35511205]How appropriate, you're acting like one.[/QUOTE]
How original.
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;35511205]How appropriate, you're acting like one.[/QUOTE]
dude his GT is XxBruteForce1xX watch out!!
Do you see how stupid an argumentum ad hominem makes you look? If you're going to take a stance you could at least, I don't know, act kindly to others.
[QUOTE=spekter;35509173]I'd be surprised but really, it won't make a difference. They're wanting a family-friendly multimedia device now not an actual console so I doubt we'll be seeing much good from it.[/QUOTE]
I liked Xbox a lot better when it appealed to the mature audience. It spread out the consoles nicely, PS3 was for both mature and family, Wii was for the family, and Xbox was for the mature. Finding games to play was easy too, I could find a nice shooter on Xbox, and a nice relaxing game on Wii. Now there are way too many titles to sift through to find what's worth buying.
[QUOTE=Protocol7;35511204]That "latin wording" is, as far as anyone who's educated is concerned, a logical fallacy that you keep using which is a big no-no in any argument.
You have no credibility. I probably don't either. But you're grasping at straws, good work.[/QUOTE]
Oh that's very good, you explained your choice of Latin wording. I'm proud of the revision you're doing into the subject. You're very much leading towards a gold star, Keep up the good work :)
[editline]10th April 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Protocol7;35511228]dude his GT is XxBruteForce1xX watch out!![/QUOTE]
You can use links, that is very surprising at your age. Well done ;). If you would like to know how I got my Gamertag then of course. It was after a book that I read and felt it would make for a very good Gamertag. I'm proud of your interest but why in such a pointless area? Needless to say, you're almost at a gold star.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.