IDF Releases Photos of 'Weapons'(A.K.A. Common Items) From Raided Freedom Flotilla Ship
690 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Sickle;22308309]Really shit post since it was an approved aid boat.[/QUOTE]
yeah guess what buddy "approved aid boat"s don't dock at gaza and try to break a blockade gg
[QUOTE=Deathbane;22308319]Defending its civilians from attacks by militants. Nowhere did i say PROTECT ITSELF FROM IMMINENT DESTRUCTION.
Also, turkey is laughable. They try to please everyonr and shout about how they are the awesome descendents of the ottomons.
If turkey retaliates, theyw ill be caught in any crossfire. Like i said, another angry child thinking throwing its toy warships around is a true solution.[/QUOTE]
Don't be dumb, Turkey is a member of NATO. One attack on their ships and you have to deal with the U.S. Sixth Fleet, which is stationed right at Naples.
[QUOTE=Soda;22308412]yeah guess what buddy "approved aid boat"s don't dock at gaza and try to break a blockade gg[/QUOTE]
Well legal blockades don't fucking appear in international waters, 'buddy'.
Protect itself. That is what i said. Your reply makes no fucking sense sickle, im not using any 'shiity rephrase'. Citizens are part of a country, therefore defending them is defending the country, as a country is the people, not the land. Turkey couldnt destroy israel, theyd just create a shitstorm other people would be involved in.
If turkey breaks the blockage, israel will fire. And you ARE and idiot if you think the US will simply jump up and start firing back at israel.
Or anyone else for that matter.
Turkey will just be blamed for starting a shit storm if the escort isnt sanctioned by nato.
Please, get off your halos and call of duty and think about this properly for a second please. I know its hard, being 14 and all.
[QUOTE=Gordy H.;22308429]Don't be dumb, Turkey is a member of NATO. One attack on their ships and you have to deal with the U.S. Sixth Fleet, which is stationed right at Naples.[/QUOTE]
Quite frankly, I don't think the US gives a shit about any of this.
Also, saying Israel will attack turkey or vice versa is stupid.
[QUOTE=Sickle;22308435]Well legal blockades don't fucking appear in international waters, 'buddy'.[/QUOTE]
How does this relate to anything? Do you even know how the event occurred? Please look up the gaza blockade really you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.
The fact is the boat displayed intention to breach a blockade. This gave Israel the right to seize the vessel. What don't you understand about that?
[QUOTE=Deathbane;22308448]Protect itself. That is what i said. Your reply makes no fucking sense sickle, im not using any 'shiity rephrase'. Citizens are part of a country, therefore defending them is defending the country, as a country is the people, not the land. Turkey couldnt destroy israel, theyd just create a shitstorm other people would be involved in.
Please, get off your halos and call of duty and think about this properly for a second please. I know its hard, being 14 and all.[/QUOTE]
Haha, wow, a stereotypical moron that sits behind his computer, and when he loses a fight, promptly involves Halo. You know, for a zionist 'man', you are nowhere near mature, and have the mental capacity of a three year old. Get out of the thread, as 5000 opinions are against yours and you rephrase everything you say to make it seem right.
[QUOTE=Glorbo;22308474]Quite frankly, I don't think the US gives a shit about any of this.
Also, saying Israel will attack turkey or vice versa is stupid.[/QUOTE]
They probably don't care about the flotilla, but a battle between Turkey and Israel would force the U.S. to help Turkey.
NATO is legally obligated to defend each other, whereas the U.S. isn't obligated to help Israel.
i know the other nations will fly off the handle. Then the egyptians will get involved to help israel, and it ll be a regional war.
[QUOTE=Soda;22308478]How does this relate to anything? Do you even know how the event occurred? Please look up the gaza blockade really you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.
The fact is the boat displayed intention to breach a blockade. This gave Israel the right to seize the vessel. What don't you understand about that?[/QUOTE]
International. Waters. No. Blockades. Are. Meant. To. Be. There. Legally.
Right I've watched most videos. And I've seen and heard most of the stories from various news agencies and I still believe the crap Israel is releasing is propaganda. I REALLY doubt the activists would start a riot unless they feared for their lives. Since you know, they didn't technically do anything that could harm Israel like say... carrying weapons to Gaza.
And I'm starting to lose more and more faith in the Israelian government.
[QUOTE=Sickle;22308500]Haha, wow, a stereotypical moron that sits behind his computer, and when he loses a fight, promptly involves Halo. You know, for a zionist 'man', you are nowhere near mature, and have the mental capacity of a three year old. Get out of the thread, as 5000 opinions are against yours and you rephrase everything you say to make it seem right.[/QUOTE]
Get out of here, your peers think your wrong!
Might work in school. I think you should go back to it, and learn some proper history about the region. :v:
[QUOTE=Deathbane;22308553]Get out of here, your peers think your wrong!
Might work in school. I think you should go back to it, and learn some proper history about the region. :v:[/QUOTE]
Oh you mean the region you stole from the little guys who couldn't defend themselves? That one? Well. Your mind certainly cannot process anything but insults.
[QUOTE=Re-y-tard;22308520]Right I've watched most videos. And I've seen and heard most of the stories from various news agencies and I still believe the crap Israel is releasing is propaganda. I REALLY doubt the activists would start a riot unless they feared for their lives. Since you know, they didn't technically do anything that could harm Israel like say... carrying weapons to Gaza.
And I'm starting to lose more and more faith in the Israelian government.[/QUOTE]
Can't say that man.
I don't trust any side now. We'll see the investigation on the matter and it's conclusions.
[QUOTE=Sickle;22308513]International. Waters. No. Blockades. Are. Meant. To. Be. There. Legally.[/QUOTE]
Life isnt that clearcut, unfortunately, otherwise all the fourteen year olds on facepunch would have solved all world crisis's by nuking all the countries with their space lasers, because certain countries on the news angered them :v:
wow i was going to respond to a lot of deathbane's posts but they are so humorous and overall wrong so i'm just going to sit back and enjoy the shitstorm. how someone can defend something that much is just beyond me. this is comedy gold
[QUOTE=Deathbane;22308598]Life isnt that clearcut, unfortuantely, otherwise all the fourteen year olds on facepunch would have solved all world crisis's by nuking all the countries with their space lasers that angered them :v:[/QUOTE]
And all the fat zionists would eat all the cookies. You aren't making sense.
They probably looked like RPGs and Ak-47s from a distance.
[QUOTE=BurnEmDown;22299349]Doesn't matter, they were still a risk to their life. Also the troops obviously didn't do this on their own accord, they followed orders. If anyone is to blame it's their commanders, but the activists who attacked them aren't clear of all charges.[/QUOTE]
Even a soldier, in a war, executing orders, is responsible for his own behaviour, and if he thinks the orders are wrong, he should not execute them, if he does, and stuff gets out, he will be put before the International Court of Justice in The hague.
[QUOTE=Sickle;22308513]International. Waters. No. Blockades. Are. Meant. To. Be. There. Legally.[/QUOTE]
The. Blockade. Is. Not. In. International. Waters. What. Are. You. Talking. About.
Let me just quote glorbo because you're clearly not comprehending anything going on here-
[quote]
The San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea was adopted in June 1994 after a series of round tables of naval and legal experts convened. In paragraph 67 it permits belligerents to attack merchant vessels flying the flag of neutral States outside of neutral waters if they "are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and after prior warning they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, search or capture". Paragraph 146 permits the capture of neutral merchant vessels outside neutral waters if they are engaged in any of the activities referred to in paragraph 67.
definition of neutral waters-Neutral waters consist of the internal waters, territorial sea, and, where applicable, the archipelagic waters, of neutral States.[/quote]
Deathbane you have lost most of your credibility, and yet you drone on about the bullshit that is Israel. Oh and 14 year olds. You must really be into that stuff.
[QUOTE=Soda;22308478]How does this relate to anything? Do you even know how the event occurred? Please look up the gaza blockade really you obviously have no idea what you're talking about.
The fact is the boat displayed intention to breach a blockade. This gave Israel the right to seize the vessel. What don't you understand about that?[/QUOTE]
Fuck. This. Shit. So if America decides to blockade Afghanistan because there may be terrorists there. It's fine right? No one will question it right?
It's completely justifiable because goddamn America said so, RIGHT?
Israel had fun in its little power trip, thinking it was so tough and mighty. Once NATO and the UN step in, it's over.
[QUOTE=Deathbane;22308510]i know the other nations will fly off the handle. Then the egyptians will get involved to help israel, and it ll be a regional war.[/QUOTE]
And then Egypt and Israel can face off with entire North Atlantic Treaty organisation.
This will be so much fun, make me some op corn and we can watch together, i'm putting my money on NATO.
[QUOTE=Glorbo;22308583]Can't say that man.
I don't trust any side now. We'll see the investigation on the matter and it's conclusions.[/QUOTE]
I'm not saying that I trust the activists completely, however the way Israel is covering it's own ass... Something doesn't smell right.
[QUOTE=Soda;22308648]The. Blockade. Is. Not. In. International. Waters. What. Are. You. Talking. About.
Let me just quote glorbo because you're clearly not comprehending anything going on here-[/QUOTE]
I couldn't give a shit less about how much information you quote. We just had a massive argument over the blockade being in international waters. Go fetch, three pages back.
[editline]11:18PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Re-y-tard;22308685]I'm not saying that I trust the activists completely, however the way Israel is covering it's[B] own ass... Something doesn't smell right.[/B][/QUOTE]
Jesus christ, bad time to use that.
[QUOTE=Sickle;22308696]
Jesus christ, bad time to use that.[/QUOTE]
Implying that wasn't intentional. :3
[QUOTE=Sickle;22308696]I couldn't give a shit less about how much information you quote. We just had a massive argument over the blockade being in international waters. Go fetch, three pages back.
[editline]11:18PM[/editline]
Jesus christ, bad time to use that.[/QUOTE]
It doesn't even matter, because you're entirely wrong. What are you talking about "blockade in international waters". Literally you have no clue what the gaza blockade even is.
[QUOTE=Re-y-tard;22308731]Implying that wasn't intentional. :3[/QUOTE]
:D
[editline]11:21PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Soda;22308735]It doesn't even matter, because you're entirely wrong. What are you talking about "blockade in international waters". Literally you have no clue what the gaza blockade even is.[/QUOTE]
Go back a few pages, or are you scared there's going to be proof and your mommy might check your browser history? Go on, check.
[QUOTE=Sickle;22308744]Go back a few pages, or are you scared there's going to be proof and your mommy might check your browser history? Go on, check.[/QUOTE]
yeah see: you have literally no argument or debate skills gg
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
