Draft of California bill would mandate porn stars wear protective eyewear like goggles during filmin
36 replies, posted
[QUOTE=The Baconator;42836862]it won't pass[/QUOTE]
Crazier laws have been passed.
Of all the asinine ideas to try and legislate, why?
For a beginning, it's not going to work for folks who aren't into steampunk/gasmask/BDSM fetishes.
More gear will just make a hassle for the business to get done, and frankly looks out of place even to me, and I'm not into porn much either.
The limited benefits of infection control will be outweighed by the turnoffs for a lot of people. They will move out of the state to film.
I could say a lot more on the subject, but I guess I'll leave it at that.
I AM DETECTING LARGE AMOUNTS OF SEMEN GAS IN THE VICINITY.
[QUOTE=InvaderNouga;42836917]Because bodily fluids can carry pathogens and exposure to the mucous membranes of the eyes will facilitate the acquiring of an infection. But with that being said I still think this bill is stupid.[/QUOTE]
Yeah I can see the rationale and condoms is a pretty normal thing to see during sex, but headgear is another matter. At some point one will have to sign an agreement about the potential liquid swap involving eyes?
[QUOTE=elitehakor;42834947]I can't wait for gasmask pornos[/QUOTE]
[b]EXTREMELY NSFW!!! ADULT CONTENT!!!![/b]
[url=http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=1350907905]I wanted to be sure.[/url]
this just in, latex+gas mask porn on the rise.
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;42834981]
Its like they're trying to kill an industry.[/QUOTE]
How profitable is the porn industry anyways? Aren't the tube porn sites killing those paid sites?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.