Bernie and Jane Sanders, under FBI investigation for bank fraud, hire lawyers - Polidicks

a career politician is a piece of shit color me shocked

[QUOTE=Cyke Lon bee;52404663]Youre still working under the assumption I disagree with the validity of the claims against Trump and that I support him.[/QUOTE] No, I'm working under the assumption that you believe: [quote]Theres not much concrete evidence but most committee members and heads of departments agree the probability exists.[/quote] Which is what you believe for reasons you won't substantiate. How do you know there's not much concrete evidence? Do you think those heads of departments would be making such claims without there being concrete evidence? They haven't said 'it's probable'. They've said, under oath, that it was a massive coordinated attack that was technologically sophisticated, that [U]they have verified their intel[/U], and so on and so forth. Though they won't disclose the exact documents/sources in a public setting you can be sure that they have in closed door sessions - likely because the sources that have verified those bits of information would become jeapordized were that information to be publicly revealed. They have [I]said[/I] as much, that the reports they're drawing their conclusions from are accessible by said representatives and that said reports [B]confirm[/B] what they've stated, but they aren't to be disclosed publicly. Putin [B]himself[/B] doesn't deny that it happened; he merely states that the blame should go to 'random patriotic Russians doing their civic duty' and so forth. Something is not "probable" after it has [I]happened[/I]. I'm sure you don't go about, today, stating 'boy, President Trump being the President sure is [I]probable[/I]'.

[QUOTE=Cyke Lon bee;52404663]Nah I'm just idealistic. Sanders shouldn't get special treatment from you all because you wanted him to win the presidency. Its blatantly hypocritical.[/QUOTE] Hey, you dropped this, I think it's your credibility. Let me be clearer. It has [i]absolutely nothing[/i] to do with who I did or didn't vote for. It has [i]absolutely everything[/i] to do with Trump being a giant loudmouth and blabbing too much, screwing himself like hordes of other criminal defendants who blab too much and admit guilt despite their lawyers screaming "shut the fuck up, for gods sake, shut the fuck up, you're not helping your case, just keep quiet and let me do my job". How do you not see this? Why do you insist on ignoring my point and putting words in my mouth as to whom I supported during the election? What makes you think I was a Bernie supporter? And above all else, why in the [i]world[/i] do you think that is at all relevant?

[QUOTE=Cyke Lon bee;52404663]Nah I'm just idealistic. Sanders shouldn't get special treatment from you all because you wanted him to win the presidency. Its blatantly hypocritical. [/QUOTE] okay, now you are just dodging the point. We are not giving him a free pass because we liked him during the election. Do not put words in our mouths. We are skeptical of these allegations because of Sanders clean record. no one here dug their hand into the sand to ignore this.

Bit of a bump, but just saw this today: [url]http://www.snopes.com/2017/07/07/gop-lawmaker-allegations-sanders/[/url] [quote]Toensig, who was also President Donald Trump’s campaign chairperson in Vermont, said in a statement that Turner approached him on 21 May 2016 saying that a former executive for People’s Bank had told him that Sanders’ office “had pressured the bank to make the loan and he felt it was improper.” Toensig also said: [quote]At one point, I asked Mr. Turner if he would reconsider giving me the banker’s name and he said he would get back to me. When he got back to me he said he had checked with the other two people at the lunch and said he did not feel comfortable sharing the executive’s name because he did not want to get him involved.[/quote] Turner, though, said that none of the bankers he spoke to had “firsthand knowledge” of the loan in question, or whether the Democratic presidential candidate contacted the bank: [quote]They said that they were aware or had heard that Bernie’s office had helped get that loan — and that was it. It was just a hearsay, general conversation.[/quote][/quote]