TSA forces breast cancer survivor and flight attendant to whip out prosthetic breast - Polidicks

We are way past the point that gains equals the costs, in my opinion. We're fingering people to go from a .01001% chance of terrorism to a .01000% chance. [editline]20th November 2010[/editline] I mostly agree with gunfox, but that ban and the comment about how "this is america, don't like it go to the UK" are a little... well dumb.

[QUOTE=Xen Tricks;26169108]Goddamn, surprised that didn't happen a long time ago. I agree'd with him the majority of the time but shit he was obnoxious. "Fuck this, fucking fuck fucker shit asshole" "Lol no i'm not angry you moron"[/QUOTE] Yup. He need's to control his temper.

[QUOTE=RyanDv3;26169124] I mostly agree with gunfox, but that ban and the comment about how "this is america, don't like it go to the UK" are a little... well dumb.[/QUOTE] He deserved the ban. Every other post of his is an insult.

First of all, yes, I admit I should stop insulting. It's a problem; it's rude; etc etc. I understand that and Is should change that. I admit my wrong doing. I'm being a complete cunt and an asshole I will agree with you that it's an issue and i'm wrong for doing that But you, Gunfox, need to give a little; just a little - a smidgen. You A: ignored my points, twice. B: have banned me and JDK in the past because of our opinions. C: You've threatened to permaban me for our Steam chat before; you banned both me and JDK for calling you Gunfurry, and you banned me for trolling after I asked for a source once for a claim. (I didn't insult you, make fun of you, be sarcastic, malicious, a dick or anything: just asked for a source) Is that shit Good moderators do? That is petty personal shit. When I say "Gunfox, you are an asshhole" That is flaming and warrants a ban, I agree. If you had banned me for 3 days, a week or whatever it may be; FINE! deserved When I call you gun furry or ask for a source, then you delve into petty shit but to go "lolwanred you" when you, uh, y'know, didn't? That's plain bullshit. You ban people for petty personal bullshit and you have before, don't even deny it. You told me in chat you were going to permaban the next person who said "gunfurry". Gunfox, if you have a fucking manly bone in your body, you'd explain YOUR position. Objectively, like i do now. Instead of banning and running away and/or ignoring me. [editline]20th November 2010[/editline] And for the rest of you; you seem to forget that I made 3 valid claims. Almost perfectly objective. and one insult So you would tell me that is now null and/or wrong because i made an insult And here's the thing, i didn't even directly call him one. I said "you deny: D: you're an ignorant fuck"

well what do you know he's back [editline]19th November 2010[/editline] what a surprise

[QUOTE=Habsburg;26169593]well what do you know he's back [editline]19th November 2010[/editline] what a surprise[/QUOTE] I have more alt's than the DPRK [editline]20th November 2010[/editline] I remember like 5% of them

Objectively, Warhol, you did resort to that in this thread. However, as I said, perma was not warranted.

[QUOTE=Ho Chi Minh;26169601]I have more alt's than the DPRK [editline]20th November 2010[/editline] I remember like 5% of them[/QUOTE] I admire your persistance

[QUOTE=Libertas;26169621]Objectively, Warhol, you did resort to that in this thread. However, as I said, perma was not warranted.[/QUOTE] Yes, I did. It was unnecessary and I'm sorry.

[QUOTE=Habsburg;26169644]I admire your persistance[/QUOTE] If you frequent this place and get banned a lot it's necessary. I'm probably soon to be one of the few GMs without an alt.

I am not in the right at all for insulting him. [editline]20th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Libertas;26169670]If you frequent this place and get banned a lot it's necessary. I'm probably soon to be one of the few GMs without an alt.[/QUOTE] I remember when alt's were bannable.

[QUOTE=Ho Chi Minh;26169673] I remember when alt's were bannable.[/QUOTE] They still are if you've been deemed ban-on-sight because you're a threat or unforgiveable. There's that one guy who posted the "I have a big ass" thread, and tho other one from OIFY who did an SQL hack. ANYWAY: We're kind of going off topic here.

Damn, and I was about to order a dozen breast-cancer survivors to perform a daring and suicidal terrorist act on an airplane by detonating bombs hidden in their prosthetic breasts. Always one step ahead of me.

[QUOTE=Libertas;26169670]If you frequent this place and get banned a lot it's necessary. I'm probably soon to be one of the few GMs without an alt.[/QUOTE] Whats with you and GMs?

[QUOTE=Libertas;26169723]They still are if you've been deemed ban-on-sight because you're a threat or unforgiveable. There's that one guy who posted the "I have a big ass" thread, and tho other one from OIFY who did an SQL hack.[/QUOTE] I called Gunfox ignorant and he's been permabanning all my alts. I didn't post child porn OR attack the forum. wtf [editline]20th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Libertas;26169723] ANYWAY: We're kind of going off topic here.[/QUOTE] Ironically I was banned for being on topic.

[QUOTE=Ho Chi Minh;26169754]I called Gunfox ignorant and he's been permabanning all my alts. I didn't post child porn OR attack the forum. wtf [editline]20th November 2010[/editline] Ironically I was banned for being on topic.[/QUOTE] PM Gestapo or another SM than, it isn't a thing I have any position to help with. [editline]19th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=starpluck;26169741]Whats with you and GMs?[/QUOTE] This is the first post I've really mentioned them in? Unless you mean the one where I said perma being used to revoke GM?

[QUOTE=Libertas;26169786]PM Gestapo or another SM than, it isn't a thing I have any position to help with.[/QUOTE] Yeah well [img]http://wpcontent.answcdn.com/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Shrug.jpg/250px-Shrug.jpg[/img] iunno y'know It's up to Gunfox. [highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("Alt of warhol" - GunFox))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=Libertas;26169020]That post would have gotten him a 3 day ban in any other topic as any other user by any other mod. Warhol has repeated this action across a period of time. He ran out of warnings. He was perma'd. I see nothing wrong, just people siding with the one they agree with. EDIT: Well, nothing wrong except it was perma. But that may have just been loss of GM.[/QUOTE] Warhol is actually an alt of Trotsky (who also has a long ban history which ends in a perma) and possibly an alt of several other permabanned users. This alone technically means I should have permabanned him from the start, but as you can see from his long ban history, I was willing to give him many, many, opportunities to stop being a jerk. I even unbanned him from a week long ban because I thought we had come to an understanding through steam chat. Apparently not. [editline]19th November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Ho Chi Minh;26169899]Yeah well [img_thumb]http://wpcontent.answcdn.com/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Shrug.jpg/250px-Shrug.jpg[/img_thumb] iunno y'know It's up to Gunfox. [highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("Alt of warhol" - GunFox))[/highlight][/QUOTE] No. We're done with this game.

I'm suddenly confused, does the Leon Trotsky we have now relate to this at all, or is he 3rd party? Also, can we get another mod's opinion in here on this please.

[QUOTE=Libertas;26170327]I'm suddenly confused, does the Leon Trotsky we have now relate to this at all, or is he 3rd party? Also, can we get another mod's opinion in here on this please.[/QUOTE] Leon's JDK, so far as I know.

Terrorists are winning by keeping us locked in a perpetual state of fear. Best thing to do at this point is tell everyone to man the fuck up and stop with all this security bullshit. When the terrorists strike again, we'll dust ourselves off and have a giant collective, "this is me giving a fuck!"

[QUOTE=Extroll;26170516]Terrorists are winning by keeping us locked in a perpetual state of fear. Best thing to do at this point is tell everyone to man the fuck up and stop with all this security bullshit. When the terrorists strike again, we'll dust ourselves off and have a giant collective, "this is me giving a fuck!"[/QUOTE] I rate you winner for avoiding the forum drama.

[QUOTE=GunFox;26170201]Warhol is actually an alt of Trotsky (who also has a long ban history which ends in a perma) and possibly an alt of several other permabanned users. This alone technically means I should have permabanned him from the start, but as you can see from his long ban history, I was willing to give him many, many, opportunities to stop being a jerk. I even unbanned him from a week long ban because I thought we had come to an understanding through steam chat. Apparently not. [editline]19th November 2010[/editline] No. We're done with this game.[/QUOTE] He's a known alt of Trotsky, Garnier, amute, Ho Chi Minh and has been known to use the "Not Tishler" account. 5 of his accounts are permabanned, the amute account being silent banned. He's in general a narcissistic, bigoted, and ignorant person who can't fathom anybody having other views than his, and tends to insult anyone who does express views not exactly the same as his. Even after being proven wrong, and having no argument left, he will continue to insult the person in an attempt to discredit them and their argument, having already defeated his. I have had rather extensive experience with amute (Warhol) over the last 2 years. While at the beginning of my stint here I'll agree the insults were warranted, as I was a rather dumb young teen in 2008, by this point he just tends to insult me, and several other people, at every opportunity he gets for no reason. Now, to the topic of the thread, I really hate all the paranoia in airports that has resulted since 9/11. I hate the idea of being full body scanned, and I find it stupid you can't even carry a tube of toothpaste, or perfume, onto a plane anymore. And them forcing this woman to take off her prosthetics is a ridiculous invasion of her person. You'd think after 32 years as a flight attendant they'd get the message that she's not trying to blow the plane up. Edit: Warhol's likely to come back on a different account and probably insult me for this post, and just me in general. Then he's likely to bitch at people in the RPWL subforum about how much of an asshole and an idiot I am, either in the OOC thread there or over XFire. He's called me out for ITN posts I've made there before, he frequents the RPWL subforum.

Warhol is like a zombie, you just can't keep him down.

[QUOTE=faze;26164080]Take a train across the ocean?[/QUOTE] First off, why are you posting in this section? Second, how are you a gold member? @Habsburg, I know about the requirements, but it occurred to me that he should have been removed by now.

[QUOTE=Shadowstone;26171475]First off, why are you posting in this section? Second, how are you a gold member?[/QUOTE] He has at least 2000 posts and has been here for 2 years [editline]19th November 2010[/editline] or he gave garry a blowjob

[QUOTE=Tigster;26164194]She worked there for 28 fucking years.[/QUOTE] Doesn't mean anything to be honest. The best plans take time, everyone knows that. The idea that seniority means loyalty is a flawed one.

[QUOTE=GunFox;26164117] If you want to trade freedom for safety, move to the UK. [/QUOTE] oh go bloody shoot your state sign and stop posting ignorant things about england at least we don't lock people away in federal prisons for marijuana so take your freedom for safety up with my twat

[QUOTE=Shadowstone;26171475]@Habsburg, I know about the requirements, but it occurred to me that he should have been removed by now.[/QUOTE] I don't know if stupidity should be permabannable

allow me to stir the conversation back: Points Gunfox ignored: A: the USAPATRIOT B: The fact you just flat out lied about the US C: claimed the US has never done anything remotely unconstitutional in the name of security