TSA forces breast cancer survivor and flight attendant to whip out prosthetic breast
198 replies, posted
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
[QUOTE=thisispain;26171993]oh go bloody shoot your state sign and stop posting ignorant things about england
at least we don't lock people away in federal prisons for marijuana so take your freedom for safety up with my twat[/QUOTE]
He already apologized for that comment, and admitted it was unwarranted.
[QUOTE=JohnRockefeller;26172413]"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."[/QUOTE]
Since the second amendment exists, lets allow anyone with guns on planes.
That's both liberating and safe.
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;26172451]Since the second amendment exists, lets allow anyone with guns on planes.
That's both liberating and safe.[/QUOTE]
Let's let people smoke at the gas station while we're at it, too.
[QUOTE=ZekeTwo;26172450]He already apologized for that comment, and admitted it was unwarranted.[/QUOTE]
it doesn't matter, he still thinks that way
[QUOTE=thisispain;26172677]it doesn't matter, he still thinks that way[/QUOTE]
are you the thought police?
[QUOTE=Snuffy;26172616]Let's let people smoke at the gas station while we're at it, too.[/QUOTE]
If you knew there were people with gun on them on the plane you were ridding, would you pull out a gun?
Why are you complaining about "pat downs". In Iran, they do anal probes.
[QUOTE=Helix Alioth;26172877]Why are you complaining about "pat downs". In Iran, they do anal probes.[/QUOTE]
No they do that here too, usually because they think you're hiding cocaine in your ass
[QUOTE=Helix Alioth;26172877]Why are you complaining about "pat downs". In Iran, they do anal probes.[/QUOTE]
What does what an oppressive country does have to do with what we do?
[QUOTE=Habsburg;26172700]are you the thought police?[/QUOTE]
no i am a concerned english national!
[QUOTE=thisispain;26172677]it doesn't matter, he still thinks that way[/QUOTE]
What way?
[QUOTE=GunFox;26173492]What way?[/QUOTE]
The American way? :v:
[quote=warhol;26164467]points you ignored:
A: The usapatriot
b: The fact you just flat out lied about the us
c: Claimed the us has never done anything remotely unconstitutional in the name of security
d: You are an ignorant fuck
[b][highlight](user was permabanned for this post ("perma'd again. You were warned." - gunfox))[/highlight][/b][/quote]
finally.
That's just going too far with the whole terrorism/drug smuggling thing.
fuck.
JDK has been unbanned by GunFox. So it's like some alternation or something
[QUOTE=Snuffy;26164966]Fuck you, TSA.
Breast cancer survivor. Cancer survivors are susceptible to a relapse. New scanners cause radiation. Radiation causes cancer.
Gee, I wonder why she refused the scanner?[/QUOTE]
I misread the article a bit, I thought she was a passenger.
[editline]20th November 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=GunFox;26165498]He was talking about the system like it applied to [b]him[/b]. You are right and it was a silly assumption, but the mistake is easily understood, given [b]his[/b] comment.[/QUOTE]
More assumptions (Gunfox is right though)
[QUOTE=ZekeTwo;26163624]
Obviously a terrorist and the freedom of the nation definitely requires victimizing fucking [b]breast cancer survivors.[/b][/QUOTE]
It's something that is [B]NOT NATURAL ON THE PERSONS BODY[/B].
If they didn't ask to see it they wouldn't be doing their job. I'd be afraid if they weren't checking everything.
Stop being so eager to be offended, for christ sake.
[QUOTE=Glaber;26172861]If you knew there were people with gun on them on the plane you were ridding, would you pull out a gun?[/QUOTE]
If I was a terrorist, sure.
The panic would probably lead to people shooting other people, and would only further serve my ends.
these are people willing to kill themselves for their cause, your "hurrf give everyone guns" typical gun arguments don't work.
The TSA will never go away anyway, neither will the terrorists. They attacked us for very specific reasons which a majority of people are unaware of, or just don't give a shit.
From one American to the rest of you, you deserve it. So hard.
p.s. GunFox: FINALLY.
this was an unreasonable search (or at least the 'show me your fake boob' part is), and is in violation of the fourth amendment.
[editline]20th November 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=Hallucinate;26175317]It's something that is [B]NOT NATURAL ON THE PERSONS BODY[/B].
If they didn't ask to see it they wouldn't be doing their job. I'd be afraid if they weren't checking everything.
Stop being so eager to be offended, for christ sake.[/QUOTE]
no one's saying they can't ask, but isn't "i'm a survivor of cancer and lost a breast, so this is my prothesis" not a reasonable explanation?
what if someone with metal plates in their leg or something goes through, they going to saw him open to check?
[QUOTE=GunFox;26173492]What way?[/QUOTE]
Points you ignored:
A: the USAPATRIOT
B: The fact you just flat out lied about the US
C: claimed the US has never done anything remotely unconstitutional in the name of security
D: You are an ignorant fuck
Pointless
All these increased security measures we had before the Underwear bomber and guess what? He still got on, his bomb just failed to go off. The Car Bomber in New York got through with ease, but his bomb also just failed to go off...
The only thing that prevented these attacks was incompetence and luck... nothing to do with security
[QUOTE=GunFox;26173492]What way?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Warhol;26164467]Points you ignored:
A: the USAPATRIOT
B: The fact you just flat out lied about the US
C: claimed the US has never done anything remotely unconstitutional in the name of security
D: You are an ignorant fuck
[highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("Perma'd again. I can't refute you." - GunFox))[/highlight][/QUOTE]
who cares if the bitch got cancer she ain't no better than the rest of us
[QUOTE=GunFox;26164325]A very small portion of the patriot act was problematic. The rest largely concerned first responders and how they would communicate between various agencies.
The really nasty portions of the act have since been removed save for a few.[/QUOTE]
On the contrary GunFox, the USA Patriot ACT was extended by the Obama Administration, which is quite a right-choice decision in my opinion and quite controversial considering that Obama is a Leftist-Democrat. But, along with that the USA Patriot ACT gives warrant to the FBI, CIA, bla bla bla, etc you get the point to wiretap any phone of anyone at any time if they claim them to be a "terrorist-deemed threat" or something along the lines of that. Most of our Constitutional Rights were really quite ignored in the Patriot ACT in my opinion but it's an agree to disagree subject and it all comes down to really... Safety vs Terrorism. At my point of the view the Terrorists won because they've managed to put fear into an entire country of over 300 million people and the world too.
[QUOTE=faze;26163893]What?[/QUOTE]
At a higher altitude you can absorb more radiation.
I think this is taking it a [b]little[/b] too far. TSA is a wonderful idea, but holy shit how they have turned into power hungry eco freaks is insane. They're almost as bad as the police!!
[QUOTE=Chilean;26163748]No one's blaming the agents so much as the system itself.[/QUOTE]
What is wrong with the system?
I fail to see how they were "victimizing her". I feel bad for her, yes, but the prosthesis really could have been hiding any number of objects. You fail to realize how clever people who traffic illegal items are in their methods.
Her co-workers should know her well enough to not look down on her for having a prosthetic breast (why one would do that in the first place is beyond me), and who cares about random people in the airport that she will never see again?
[QUOTE=IStanI;26177050]Points you ignored:
A: the USAPATRIOT
B: The fact you just flat out lied about the US
C: claimed the US has never done anything remotely unconstitutional in the name of security
D: You are an ignorant fuck[/QUOTE]
A: didn't ignore it. Discussed it for several posts.
B: Where
C: Nope.
D: Nope.
And that wasn't even what I was asking about.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.