Two New Teasers for Crysis 2 Show Off the Nanosuit 2 - Polidicks

Dont know why people always whine about Crysis's gameplay, ofcourse it had great graphics, but i also loved the story!

Looks cool, but "Nanosuit 2" sounds stupid. Better name, please.

Damn, Crysis gets such an unbelievable amount of shit, and for what reason I have no idea. Must be nerd rage from people pissed off it doesn't work on their ancient computers or something. The game was no more generic than 90% of the shooters out there, Hell I find Halo MORE generic than Crysis. Also everyone seems to say half life 1 was an amazing game, but the Crysis plot isn't worse and I could point to many areas in which Crysis does things much better. Also, I still haven't even seen an engine more technically advanced than Cryengine.

[QUOTE=Isotope;16870623]Also everyone seems to say half life 1 was an amazing game, but the Crysis plot isn't worse and I could point to many areas in which Crysis does things much better. Also, I still haven't even seen an engine more technically advanced than Cryengine.[/QUOTE] Way to go to compare Crysis with HL when they have a 9 year difference. The Crysis plot was generic because of that stupid army shit. Seriously, I'm tired of seeing stupid army shit. The only game that does stupid army shit right is the CoD series (except for the treyarch ones cuz they are even more generic stupid army shit).

i agree with u isotope, i don't get the shit, the game was hell of alot of fun, story was pretty damn good and somewhat original. the game is orgasimicly sexy. back on topic, i agree the old nano suit looked better than this one. what i would like to see is a new faceplate.

[QUOTE=LoLWaT?;16871011]You do realise that in that paragraph you were comparing an awesome game from 1998 to an awesome game from 2007. Things [b]HAVE[/b] come a long way since the 20th century...[/QUOTE] Of course I realize that, however honestly it is a first person shooter. Yes, HL1 was amazing at the time, I however do not see why Crysis should be judged 1000x more harshly because it was made years later. If you wanted some fantastical story that has never been seen before then fine, just don't complain about crysis because it covered a storyline closer to fun little action flick. [QUOTE=i_speel_good;16871029]Way to go to compare Crysis with HL when they have a 9 year difference. The Crysis plot was generic because of that stupid army shit. Seriously, I'm tired of seeing stupid army shit. The only game that does stupid army shit right is the CoD series (except for the treyarch ones cuz they are even more generic stupid army shit).[/QUOTE] Some people are bitching about the story, a storyline is timeless, it does not matter when the games were made. I don't see why Crysis must somehow have some groundbreaking innovative story just because it's newer than other games that people wet themselves over. They chose to do a game that got the closest to a movie cinematic experience in an FPS that I have ever seen. It was a nice little story, executed well. The game was beautifully finished right down to what I thought seemed like somewhat plausible aliens. (not that any alien is really that plausible) Something which I can't say applies to quite a few other recent big name games. The game isn't perfect, but neither is HL2, or Halo. Just really tired of seeing dumb shit comments about how you need a super computer to run it, or that it's somehow generic and shitty.

[QUOTE=DrBreen;16859497]Did you really play the game?[/QUOTE] Yes I did play the game. There was nothing really unique about it at all. Run in, shoot things, stealth, run away, run back in shooting. The plot didn't have enough depth to keep me interested in it and by the end I was having more fun trying to fine ways to exploit the game, rather than play it.

Article isn't showing up.