'Anonymous' delivers: releases over 10 GB of "confidential information that is sure to embarrass, di - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Dr_Funk;31577727]wonderful. fight back against the man by releasing addresses, informant info, social security numbers, etc, all because some of you got arrested. that'll really save the world. just kidding, fuck the lot of you. e: good people may die for this. i know if i was a serious criminal, i'd be looking through those snitch lists very carefully.[/QUOTE] Exactly this post, this is just fucking stupid. "Anon" is butthurt over nothing.

[QUOTE=Taepodong-2;31586318]Anonymous thinks they're so tough hiding behind computer screens in their mother's basements, but they know they're not going to last a second if the civil war or whatever the fuck they're trying to start happens.[/QUOTE] This is totally true, they'll be as useful as well, a fat kid who eats all the rations. They think they'll be leading the revolution when in fact they'll be the cannon fodder.

[QUOTE=Ermac20;31586590]ahh the us nothing like this happens in canada or maybe i just dont hear about it[/QUOTE] I want to see leaked emails from the police surrounding the G-whatever protests in Toronto, they handled that like buffoons and somebody still needs to lose their job over it.

remember when that group of [I]actual[/I] hackers owned lulzsec and released all their names and account info to the world for being all-around giant faggots? yeah, have fun with that antisec

[QUOTE=Carbon Knight;31585785]That is practically if not literally the definition of terrorism.[/QUOTE] That isn't the definition of terrorism, literally or otherwise. Not even close. I take international politics, and the field would be very different if that was the definition. Edit: Alright, Chryseus and ForgottenKane. Could either of you tell me why you disagreed with my first post in this thread? I don't mind, I'm just curious.

[QUOTE=Carbon Knight;31585785]That is practically if not literally the definition of terrorism.[/QUOTE] what the christ Being feared by law enforcement is not anything remotely close to a definition of terrorism. here's one: [I]the calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear[/I] In this instance, Anonymous is a terrorist group, as they want to attain ideological goals, and seek to do so through intimidation and fear. But certainly not by being feared by law enforcement. By that definition, internal affairs and oversight organizations are terrorist in nature.

[QUOTE=Contag;31588386] In this instance, Anonymous is a terrorist group, as they want to attain ideological goals, and seek to do so through intimidation and fear. [/QUOTE] Could you argue that it's against civilians, though? That's a huge component of the generally accepted definition of terrorism, and in this case it's aimed at police, who aren't classified in this instance as civilians.

So, anything any good in this shit?

Prepare yourselves for the internet police, fellow Americans. :rolleyes:

So much for a free internet. If these buffoons have their way we might be walking into a digital 3rd reich.

[QUOTE=devotchkade;31588518]Could you argue that it's against civilians, though? That's a huge component of the generally accepted definition of terrorism, and in this case it's aimed at police, who aren't classified in this instance as civilians.[/QUOTE] It's aimed at the government, so yes. As much as they don't want to admit it, law enforcement is predominately composed of civilians as well. It's a bit of an issue with where to draw the line. Is it justifiable to firebomb a infantry column in war? Is it justifiable to firebomb the factory which produces their weapons? Is it justifiable to firebomb the homes of the people who work in the factory? and so on.

the government should have better security, that's all I'm saying.

[QUOTE=Starpluck;31577654] We have no sympathy for any of the officers or informants who may be endangered by the release of their personal information. For too long they have been using and abusing our personal information, spying on us, arresting us, beating us, and thinking that they can get away with oppressing us in secrecy. Well it's retribution time: we want them to experience just a taste of the kind of misery and suffering they inflict upon us on an everyday basis. Let this serve as a warning to would-be snitches and pigs that your leaders can no longer protect you: give up and turn on your masters now before it's too late.[/QUOTE] Fuck You

[QUOTE=imawerewol;31577797]This actually makes me angry. Not only are they endangering plenty of good officers, but by doing so they are supporting much more dangerous criminals. For fucks sake, these people have no idea what they're doing.[/QUOTE] But you don't understand!!! All cops are really bad on my encounter with some and I know their bad due to my encounter and all the bad videos about the cops online!!!! Fuck the police! I don't need them, Anarchy whoop! Who cares if these snitches die even though they're probably helping the society! This will for sure help society be better! Not to mention that even those cops who put on the facade of being a good cop deserves to be punished the same!!! [spoiler] /satire This is fucking disgusting and I hate it all, and everyone who's whining about this sort of bullshit. [/spoiler]

the government should have better security, that's all I'm saying.

Though "anonymous" claim to fight for good causes, all they've done here is endanger a bunch of people who are trying their best to serve their country. Sure, some of them won't be perfect cops, but giving personal information of cops does nothing to further the causes anonymous claims to want to pursue... It just makes them pricks. And like someone said earlier, it really endangers the freedom of the internet in the future. In the UK, we've recently had the first case of internet providers being legally told to block certain websites. If idiots carry on with this kind of thing, then that kind of legislation with snowball into far bigger restrictions.

[QUOTE=Jund;31585923]Giving out information the public wants to know = lose support Giving out information that gets innocents killed = gain support ?[/QUOTE] That is not even what I was saying a little bit...I was saying people would be more concerned if Anonymous released files from the worlds largest Clandestine Agency, I am not saying that local law enforcement are lesser by any means.

yeah man fuck the police! because um

I find it so stupid how they try fighting police corruption by putting innocent people's lives in danger.

[QUOTE=mookman22;31596334]I find it so stupid how they try fighting police corruption by putting innocent people's lives in danger.[/QUOTE]The best part is I bet that most of anon would snitch in exchange for a reduced sentence at the drop of a hat.

[QUOTE=Mingebox;31596752]The best part is I bet that most of anon would snitch in exchange for a reduced sentence at the drop of a hat.[/QUOTE] Isn't that how they got most of Anti-sec?

is asking for that LOIC program here going to get me banned?

If they used the time they used on this to work out, more moms would have a free basement, and more guys would have a girlfriend.

It's just like that one guy "Fuck da police"

training files, hurray, now i can learn to snipe better

Everyone is human, and I would rather have a cop around when shit goes down than I would some tough guy eating a bowl of chicken and sipping purple drank.

Are you serious... These people are endangering lives, I hope these people burn in hell.

Seriously awful. Can't wait till the black hats and white hats team up again to obliterate these kiddies.

[QUOTE=RichyZ;31615974]the blackhats only attacked lsec because they were acting like they were the shit and thought they were helping the public[/QUOTE] Isn't AntiSec starting to head down that road too?

[QUOTE=Ermac20;31586590]ahh the us nothing like this happens in canada or maybe i just dont hear about it[/QUOTE] Atleast we don't throw tantrums when we loose a hockey cup.